Publication Search

Using Non Performing Financing (NPF) as a moderating variable, this study looks at how profit sharing and profit margin financing affect the effectiveness and stability of Islamic banks in Indonesia. The primary topic discussed is how various Islamic financing arrangements affect the operational effectiveness and financial stability of banks, as well as whether credit risk enhances or diminishes these connections. This study aims to examine the direct impacts of financing modalities as well as the moderating influence of NPF on the performance of Islamic banks. Based on secondary data from eight Islamic banks in Indonesia between 2018-2024, this study employs a quantitative methodology using panel data regression and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The findings indicate that while profit margin financing has no discernible impact on efficiency, profit sharing financing has a favorable and considerable impact. Profit margin financing has a negative and negligible impact on stability, whereas profit sharing financing has a positive but negligible impact. Additionally, by changing the direction of influence, NPF significantly moderates the association between profit sharing financing and both efficiency and stability. However, it does not significantly moderate the effect of profit margin financing on efficiency, but it does on stability. In summary, the effectiveness of Islamic financing is heavily reliant on risk management, especially credit risk control, where NPF is a key factor in evaluating whether financing can improve stability and efficiency in Islamic banks.

This study analyzes the implementation of the murabahah contract in resolving Non-Performing Financing (NPF) for micro-enterprises through collateral auction at the Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI) Ahmad Yani Branch Office, Area Bandung Raya. The primary objective is to analyze the conformity of the auction process with comprehensive Sharia principles (fiqih muamalah), particularly focusing on the final stage of debt resolution. Employing a qualitative-descriptive method, data was gathered through literature review and direct interviews with personnel from the bank's collection and recovery department. The findings indicate that the NPF resolution procedure is conducted systematically and ethically, beginning with warnings, mediation, and intensive restructuring efforts, such as rescheduling and reconditioning, in line with the spirit of ta'awun and Fatwa DSN MUI No. 48/2005. The auction is only performed as a final, likuidatif resort when the customer is non-cooperative or entirely unable to pay after all 3R attempts have failed. Crucially, the process generally aligns with positive regulations and Sharia provisions, including the transparent process of Muzayyadah through KPKNL. Key aspects of Sharia compliance include the bank's commitment to returning any surplus funds from the collateral sale directly to the customer, thereby avoiding ghulul (fraudulent gain), and the provision of the option to waive the remaining debt for customers deemed genuinely unable to fulfill their obligations, in line with Fatwa DSN MUI No 47/DSN-MUI/II/2005. This research provides practical insights for Islamic financial institutions on balancing effectiveness in debt resolution with the imperative of comprehensive Sharia compliance and ethical transactional justice.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of financial ratios on financial distress in Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. This study uses determinants financial distress that isDebt Ratio (DR), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return On Equity (ROE), and Operating Expenses Operating Income (BOPO). The population of this study is all Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The sample taken is the quarterly financial reports of Islamic commercial banks for 9 periods, namely the 2016-2024 period using the purposive sampling and using panel data binary logistic regression testing techniques. Based on the research conducted, the results show that Debt Ratio (DR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return On Equity (ROE), and Operational Expenses Operating Income (BOPO) have an effect on financial distress. Whereas Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) has no effect on financial distress.

This research aims to determine the influence of Islamic banking financial ratios in the form of Return on Assets (ROA) Ratio, Non Performing Financing (NPF) Ratio, Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) and Total Asset Turnover (TATO) on the Operational Cost-Operational Income Ratio (BOPO) at Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia.  This research uses a quantitative approach with sample data totaling 7 (seven) sharia commercial banks out of 13 (thirteen) sharia commercial bank populations registered with the Financial Services Authority. Research data uses secondary data for the annual period in the period 2010 - 2023. By using the ARDL (Autoreggressive Distributed Lag) panel model using the PMG (Pooled Mean Group) method, the research results show that in the panel, it turns out that the Leading Indicator is the effectiveness of the variable in controlling the BOPO Ratio at Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia is Return on Assets (ROA), where ROA significantly influences the BOPO Ratio at Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Bank Aceh Syariah, Bank Riau Kepri Syariah, Bank Jabar Banten Syariah, Bank Mega Syariah, and Bank NTB Syariah, with stable positions in the short and long term. Of the 7 (seven) Sharia Commercial Banks that are the objects of research, there are 4 (four) banks that are leading indicators of the effectiveness of sharia banking in influencing the stability of the BOPO ratio, namely: Bank Aceh Syariah, Bank Riau Kepri Syariah, Bank Jabar Banten Syariah, and Bank Mega Syariah through ROA, NPF, FDR, and TATO.  Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) is also capable of being a Leading Indicator of variable effectiveness to influence the BOPO Ratio at Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Bank Aceh Syariah, Bank Riau Kepri Syariah, Bank BCA Syariah, Bank Jabar Banten Syariah, Bank Mega Syariah, and Bank NTB Syariah, However, its position is unstable in the short and long term.

The purpose of this study is to know and analyze the influence of intellectual capital and musyarakh financing on the financial performance of Sharia Commercial Banks for the 2017-2022 period. This research is a quantitative research that uses secondary data. The population in this study amounted to 13 Sharia Commercial Banks. Samples are selected using the Purposive Sampling method. In this study produced a sample of 48 observational data (8 BUS in 6 years). The results showed that Intellectual Capital partially affected the financial performance of Sharia Commercial Banks for the 2017-2022 period. Meanwhile, Musyarakah Financing does not significantly affect the financial performance of Sharia Commercial Banks for the 2017-2022 period.

Credit risk is a risk that occurs due to the failure of customers or other parties to fulfill their obligations to the bank. Credit risk is the risk of possible losses as a result of non-repayment of credit provided by the bank to debtors (Natasia 2014). The higher the credit risk of a bank, the greater the number of problem loans. Credit risk can be measured by the Non Performing Financing (NPF) ratio. Nugraha 2018) Non Performing Financing or commonly abbreviated as NPF is the ratio between problematic financing and total financing disbursed by sharia banks. Nuha (2016) Non Performing Financing (NPF) is a comparison of problematic credit/financing with the total credit/financing provided. The higher the NPF ratio indicates a bank's inability to manage its problematic credit/financing, this will reduce the level of confidence of a bank in carrying out business activities. Problematic financing consists of substandard, doubtful and non-performing financing.

This study aims to examine the effect of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) and Third Party Funds (DPK) on Musyarakah Financing at Islamic Commercial Banks with Non-performing financing (NPF) as a moderating variable. A quantitative approach is used by utilizing documentary studies using secondary data from the annual financial statements of each Islamic Bank in Indonesia from 2018 to 2022. Sampling was done purposively by selecting 11 banks as samples. The data analysis method used is moderated regression analysis (MRA). The hypotheses in this study are: (1) FDR affects the distribution of Musyarakah financing in Islamic commercial banks, (2) DPK affects the distribution of Musyarakah financing in Islamic commercial banks, (3) NPF moderates the effect of FDR on the distribution of Musyarakah financing, and (4) NPF moderates DPK on the distribution of Musyarakah financing. The results showed that: (1) FDR has a negative and significant effect on Musyarakah Financing in Islamic commercial banks, (2) DPK has a positive and significant effect on profitability in Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia, (3) NPF does not moderate the effect of FDR on Musyarakah Financing, and (4) NPF moderates the effect of DPK on Musyarakah Financing in Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia.