Publication Search

This research aims to investigate the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which are measured by 3 indicators; institutional ownership, managerial ownership, board indeoendence, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Tax Avoidance in Multinational Companies on Indonesia. The study used multiple linear regression with periods start from 2022 until 2024. The sample of this study is a multinational companies in Indonesia with the total of 47 samples for 3 years, the criteria of the company can be said multinational companies is if the companies had a entities in more than one country. Tax avoidance is measured using the Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR), while GCG variables and CSR disclosure are measured based on relevant ownership structures, board composition, and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) index. The result shows that Institutional ownership had a significantly negative effect of tax avoidance, while the other three independent variables had no significant power in Tax Avoidance. This study concludes that tax avoidance in multinational companies is a complex phenomenon influenced by various internal and external factors beyond the scope of this research. The findings provide practical implications for regulators and investors and suggest that future research should consider additional variables, longer observation periods, and alternative tax avoidance proxies.

This study investigates the determinants of dividend payout policy in energy sector firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2020–2024 period. Dividend policy is a critical issue in emerging markets, especially in capital-intensive industries with high investment needs and earnings volatility. The research examines whether profitability and ownership structure—specifically institutional and managerial ownership—significantly influence dividend payout decisions, considering firm characteristics. The study analyzes the effect of profitability, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership on the dividend payout ratio, while controlling for firm size and leverage. A quantitative approach is used, employing pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression on 245 firm-year observations. Dividend payout ratio is measured as dividend per share divided by earnings per share, profitability is proxied by return on equity, and ownership variables are expressed as shareholding proportions. Descriptive analysis and classical assumption tests precede hypothesis testing. The results show that profitability positively and significantly affects dividend payout, suggesting that firms with better financial performance tend to distribute higher dividends. Firm size also positively influences dividend policy, while leverage negatively impacts it, reflecting the role of financial capacity and capital structure. However, institutional and managerial ownership do not show significant effects on dividend payout decisions. The findings indicate that dividend policy in Indonesian energy firms is primarily driven by financial performance and structural characteristics rather than ownership-based governance mechanisms. This study offers sector-specific evidence that refines agency and signaling perspectives on dividend policy in emerging markets, with practical implications for managers, investors, and regulators.

This study empirically examines the effects of ownership structure, including managerial, institutional, and public ownership, on tax avoidance practices, using profitability as a moderating variable. The population in this study consists of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), from which a sample was selected using purposive sampling. A total of 330 observations were collected from 110 manufacturing companies for the period 2022–2024. The variables were tested using multiple linear regression in EViews 12. This study expands on previous research by using profitability as a moderating variable that can influence the relationship between ownership structure and tax avoidance. The results show that institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on tax avoidance practices. An increase in institutional share ownership can reduce tax avoidance practices. Meanwhile, managerial and public ownership do not affect tax avoidance practices. In the moderation test, profitability strengthened the effect of managerial and institutional ownership on tax avoidance. Still, it did not moderate the impact between public ownership and tax avoidance.

This study aims to analyze the relationship between managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, and research and development (R&D) expenses on Intellectual Capital Disclosure (ICD) in healthcare sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2020–2024 period. Intellectual Capital Disclosure is essential as it reflects a company’s ability to manage knowledge, innovation, and human resources that serve as its competitive advantage. This research employs a quantitative approach using the total sampling method, where all healthcare sector companies that meet the criteria are included as samples. Secondary data were obtained from annual reports and analyzed using panel data regression with the assistance of Stata 19 software. Model selection was conducted through Chow, Hausman, and Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests, with the results indicating that the Random Effect Model (REM) was the most appropriate model to use. The results show that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and audit committee have negative and insignificant relationships with Intellectual Capital Disclosure. In contrast, research and development activities have a positive and significant relationship with Intellectual Capital Disclosure.

This study aims to analyze the effect of institutional ownership and firm size on auditdelay with audit quality as a moderating variable in 54 mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2021–2024 period. Using a quantitative approach with panel regression analysis, The audit delay is calculated using the number of days between the end of the financial year and issuance date of the audited financial statements; Institutionelles Eigentum is calculated by percentage institutional shareholding; firm size by the natural logarithm of total assets; and audit quality is proxied by the reputation of the Public Accounting Firm (Big Four and Non-Big Four). The results show that institutional ownership has no effect on audit delay, firm size has a negative effect on audit delay, and audit quality weakens the negative effect of both institutional ownership and firm size on audit delay. These findings highlight the need for companies and auditors to reconsider the effectiveness of monitoring mechanisms and audit quality to achieve more optimal audit completion.

This study aims to analyze the influence of multinationality and tax haven utilization on transfer pricing activities, with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The research focuses on energy sector companies in Indonesia, using 70 data samples obtained from company reports and financial statements. Regression analysis with moderation was employed to test the hypotheses. The findings reveal that both multinationality and tax haven practices significantly influence transfer pricing activities. However, institutional ownership does not moderate the relationship between multinationality and transfer pricing but does moderate the relationship between tax haven and transfer pricing. These findings indicate that multinational expansion and the use of tax havens play an essential role in determining corporate transfer pricing behavior. Furthermore, the presence of institutional ownership strengthens the influence of tax haven utilization on transfer pricing practices, showing that ownership structure affects how companies manage their tax-related strategies. This research contributes to a better understanding of the determinants of transfer pricing in multinational enterprises and offers practical implications for policymakers in designing effective tax regulations and governance standards related to corporate taxation.

Environmental sustainability has become an essential approach for companies to enhance their competitive advantage and reputation. This study examines the effect of ownership structure on sustainability performance and firm value. This study uses data from state-owned enterprises listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Ownership structure is proxied by institutional ownership, management ownership, and public ownership; sustainability performance is proxied by the total economic score, environmental score, and social score; and firm value is proxied by Tobin's Q. Our results reveal that ownership structure (management ownership, institutional ownership, and public ownership) have a direct effect on firm value, but indirectly do not have an indirect effect on firm value through CSR does not mediate the relationship between management ownership and institutional ownership with firm value. The unique findings of this study indicate that CSR mediates the relationship between public ownership and firm value. Public ownership partially mediates the relationship between firm type and firm value. The implications of this study will be significant for policymakers, corporate management, academics, and investors in considering the adoption and importance of corporate environmental practices.

Financial stability in manufacturing companies is an important issue, especially when facing national and global economic uncertainty. Good corporate governance is considered a framework that can drive technological innovation to enhance corporate excellence and achieve sustainable financial stability. This study aims to analyze the influence of the size of independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership on financial stability, with technological innovation as a mediating variable. The research data for this study were obtained from the annual financial reports of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2020 to 2023. Data analysis was performed using panel data regression and mediation testing using the Sobel test approach. The research findings indicate that the size of the independent board of commissioners has a positive effect on technological innovation, while managerial ownership has a negative effect and institutional ownership has no significant effect on technological innovation. However, the size of the independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and technological innovation all have a significant effect on financial stability. The technology innovation variable also proved to mediate the influence of the size of the independent board of commissioners on financial stability. This finding emphasizes the importance of good corporate governance and technological innovation in maintaining the financial stability of manufacturing companies.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Accounting Conservatism, Corporate Governance, and Financial Distress on Tax Aggressiveness in non-cyclical consumer sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2019 to 2023. This study uses a quantitative approach with secondary data in the form of annual financial reports of sample companies. Sampling was carried out using a purposive sampling technique, resulting in 14 companies that met the research criteria with a total of 70 observations over five years. The analysis method used is panel data regression, and testing was conducted using E-Views 12 software. The main objective of this study is to determine the extent to which conservatism practices in financial reporting, corporate governance, and the company's financial condition (in the context of financial distress) can influence the company's tendency to engage in tax aggressiveness, namely efforts to minimize the tax burden legally but aggressively. The results of the study indicate that simultaneously, the three independent variables—accounting conservatism, corporate governance, and financial distress—have a significant influence on tax aggressiveness. However, only corporate governance (as proxied by institutional ownership) and financial distress were found to have a significant influence on tax aggressiveness. In contrast, accounting conservatism and corporate governance, as proxied by managerial ownership, did not show a significant influence. These findings suggest that companies with high institutional ownership tend to be better able to control aggressive tax management practices, while financial distress encourages management to seek tax efficiency measures as a survival strategy. This research contributes to the interests of regulators and stakeholders in understanding the factors influencing tax aggressiveness in vital industrial sectors such as non-cyclical consumer goods.

Data from the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) indicate that the impact of COVID-19 in 2020, 2021, and peaking in 2022 led to a significant increase in merger and acquisition (M&A) activities. This trend suggests that M&A actions have become an essential strategy for sustaining and enhancing business performance. However, not all M&A activities result in success, making it crucial to understand the factors influencing their outcomes. This study aims to examine and provide empirical evidence on the effect of board size, institutional ownership, and firm size on merger and acquisition performance. Agency theory and signaling theory are employed as the theoretical frameworks to explain the relationships between the independent and dependent variables. The population of this study consists of publicly listed companies that conducted mergers and acquisitions between 2019 and 2023. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, resulting in a total of 150 samples. Data were collected through non-participant observation, and the data analysis technique applied was multiple linear regression. The results show that institutional ownership has a positive effect on merger and acquisition performance. In contrast, board size and firm size do not significantly influence M&A performance. These findings indicate that monitoring by institutional shareholders can enhance the effectiveness of strategic decision-making, while a larger organizational structure and firm size do not necessarily support post-merger integration success.

Carbon emissions in Indonesia continue to increase in line with the growing energy consumption needed to meet public demands. Energy sector companies, which contribute significantly to carbon emissions, are expected to take responsibility for their operational activities. One form of accountability is through carbon emission disclosure as a means of transparency to stakeholders. This study aims to examine the impact of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and foreign ownership on carbon emission disclosure. The research objects are energy sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2021–2023 period. The study utilizes secondary data derived from annual reports, with a sample of 35 companies and 95 observations in total. Hypothesis testing was conducted using the t-test. The results indicate that institutional ownership and foreign ownership have a positive effect on carbon emission disclosure, while managerial ownership has a negative effect on carbon emission disclosure.

This research aims to examine the influence of institutional ownership and profitability variables on company value. The population in this study are Fast Moving Consumer Goods companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2021. The sampling technique for this research uses the Purposive Sampling Technique where the sample is selected using certain criteria so that in this research 15 companies were obtained over 3 years so that a total of 45 research data were obtained. The data analysis technique used in this research uses statistical analysis which includes multiple correlation, multiple regression, determination tests and hypothesis tests. The results of this research institutional ownership variable obtained a significance value of 0.546>0.05. So it can be concluded that institutional ownership has no effect on company value. Return On Assets variable obtained a significant value of 0.112>0.05. So it can be concluded that Return On Assets has no effect on company value.

This study was conducted on banks sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2018-2022 with the aim of testing and determining the effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanisms (board of commissioners, board of directors, audit committee, institutional ownership) and Company Size on Financial Performance. The sampling technique used is the purposive sampling method where there are 26 companies x 5 years = 130. The analysis method used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Then the determination coefficient analysis is also used to see the magnitude of the variable contribution. Based on the results of the determination coefficient research in this study, it shows that the board of commissioners obtained a value of 0.046 <0.05, the board of directors 0.000 <0.05, institutional ownership 0.000 <0.05, and company size 0.003 <0.05, this shows that the board of commissioners, board of directors, institutional ownership and company size have an effect on financial performance. While the audit committee does not affect financial performance because its value is 0.942> 0.05.

This study aims to analyze how internal control and ownership structure influence the quality of consolidated financial statements in public companies in Indonesia. The research adopts a literature review approach to analyze the impact of internal control and ownership structure on the quality of consolidated financial statements in public companies. Data was obtained through relevant secondary literature, such as academic papers, books, and research reports related to the impact of ownership structure changes on the consolidated financial statements of companies in Indonesia. The researcher conducted a literature search through online databases, such as Google Scholar, using relevant keywords and only considering trustworthy and relevant findings. The researcher also expanded the review by considering various perspectives to gain a more comprehensive understanding. The results of the study are divided into several main sections, including the quality of financial statements, consolidated financial statements, and the impact of internal control and ownership structure on public companies. The study concludes that strong internal control has a significant positive impact on the quality of consolidated financial statements, acting as a mechanism to prevent fraud and maintain the integrity of financial data. Strict controls improve compliance with accounting standards, making the reports more transparent and reliable. In addition, institutional ownership has been proven to have a significant positive impact on the quality of financial statements, as it encourages transparency and external oversight. However, managerial ownership does not show a significant impact, indicating that the incentives from managerial stock ownership are not strong enough to influence the improvement of financial statement quality.    

This study aims to find out and prove the influence of Good Corporate Governance, Gender Diversity, and Age diversity on financial performance in infrastructure sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020-2023 period. The companies that became the population in this study were 69 companies by eliminating as many as 23 companies. The analysis methods used in this study are classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing using SPSSV26 For Windows software as a tool. The results of this study stated that the audit committee, institutional ownership, gender diversity of the board of commissioners, age diversity of the board of commissioners had no effect on financial performance. Gender diversity of the board of directors and gender diversity of the board of directors have an impact on financial performance.

This research aims to analyze the influence of inventory intensity, institutional ownership and capital intensity on tax aggressiveness with independent commissioners as a moderating variable in basic industrial and chemical companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2023. The research sample consisted of 24 companies with a total of 120 sample data. This research uses secondary data in the form of company financial reports. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling technique with certain criteria. The data analysis method uses panel data regression using Eviews 12th. The research results show that inventory intensity and institutional ownership have no influence on tax aggressiveness. Meanwhile, capital intensity has a positive effect on tax aggressiveness. Apart from that, independent commissioners are unable to moderate the influence of inventory intensity and institutional ownership on tax aggressiveness. However, independent commissioners are able to weaken the influence of capital intensity on tax aggressiveness.

This research aims to determine good corporate governance and ineffective monitoring of the condition of financial reports. This research uses a quantitative approach with a sample of 33 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2020 - 2022. This research investigates the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable by analyzing data from energy sector companies. This method uses multiple linear analysis techniques. The research results show that managerial ownership has a significant impact on the condition of financial statements. In line with the fraud triangle theory, which states that high management ownership can increase pressure to achieve financial goals and provide an opportunity to do so. Financial statement fraud is not influenced by institutional ownership and ineffective monitoring. These findings suggest that the effects of institutional ownership and ineffective monitoring may not be easy to predict. Further research is needed to understand the complexity of the components that contribute to the condition of financial statements.

This study aims to evaluate whether the mechanism of corporate governance, which involves institutional ownership, management ownership, independent commissioners and audit committee variables, has a significant impact on the integrity of the financial reports of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2019-2022. The sampling method uses techniques of non-probability sampling with approach purposive sampling. Based on the research results, it shows that 1) Institutional Ownership has a positive and significant effect on the integrity of financial reports. 2) Managerial ownership has no effect on the integrity of financial reports. 3) Independent Commissioners have a positive and significant influence on the integrity of financial reports. 4) The audit committee has a positive and significant effect on the integrity of financial reports. It is hoped that this research can provide additional strength to integrity in the presentation of financial reports, so that it can support the company's survival.

This research aims to examine the effect of financial distress and good corporate governance on earnings management in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). This type of research is quantitative research. The sampling method used was a purposive sampling method based on predetermined criteria. The samples used in this research were 60 samples from companies that met the criteria. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis and is assisted by the SPSS 22.0 statistical program. The results of this research show that the variables financial distress, institutional ownership, and audit committee have no effect on earnings management. Meanwhile, managerial ownership has a negative effect on earnings management.

The aim of this research is to determine the influence of ownership structure on financial performance and the effect of ESG scores moderates the relationship between ownership structure and financial performance. The population in this study was companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020-2022 period, resulting in a sample of 183. This study used Eviews 12.0 as an analysis tool. The analytical method used is Multiple Linear Regression with the Fixed Effect Model (FEM) panel data type. The results obtained in this research are that foreign ownership has a significant effect on financial performance and ESG scores can significantly moderates the relationship between foreign ownership and financial performance. Meanwhile institutional ownership, ESG scores does not had a significant affect on financial performance, and ESG scores cannot moderates the relationship between institutional ownership and financial performance.