Publication Search

This qualitative literature review synthesizes contemporary research on how dual-class share structures shape agency costs, voting divergence, and corporate governance outcomes. The review finds that disproportionate voting rights increase managerial entrenchment risks and weaken shareholder oversight, thereby amplifying agency costs across diverse institutional settings. However, governance safeguards particularly time bound and event-based sunset clauses emerge as effective mechanisms for moderating the long-term risks of control disproportionality. While dual class firms may benefit from strategic insulation that fosters innovation and long-term value creation, the absence of sunset provisions is consistently associated with reduced firm valuation, diminished accountability, and persistent divergence between control and ownership. Overall, this synthesis highlights that dual-class structures are not universally harmful, but their sustainability depends on the presence of robust governance constraints designed to restore alignment over time.

Tax avoidance presents a unique challenge, as it is morally acceptable and does not violate the law, yet it is detrimental to the government. There are loopholes (grey areas) in the tax code that are exploited. To further examine the influence of factors including institutional ownership, audit committees, firm age, and debt (leverage) on tax avoidance, this study aims to gather data. The analysis uses multiple regression at a 5% significance level on data obtained from 177 of 59 consumer goods sector companies listed on the IDX for the 2022–2024 period. A partial and statistically significant relationship was found between fiscal policy and factors such as firm age, institutional ownership, audit committees, and leverage. Penghindaran pajak menghadirkan tantangan khusus, karena secara moral dapat diterima serta tidak pemerintah tidak melanggar hukum, namun merugikan pemerintah. Ada celah (grey area) dalam kode pajak yang dimanfaatkan. Guna mempelajari lebih lanjut berkaitan dengan berpengaruhnya faktor termasuk kepemilikan institusional, komite audit, firm age, serta utang (leverage) atas penghindaran pajak, penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mengumpulkan fakta. Analisis menggunakan regresi berganda pada tingkat signifikansi 5% pada data yang diperoleh sebanyak 177 dari 59 perusahaan sektor barang konsumsi terdaftar di BEI periodisasi 2022-2024. Ditemukan hubungan parsial serta sinifikan secara statistik kebijakan fiskal serta faktor seperti umur perusahaan, kepemilikan institusional, komite audit, serta leverage.

Land rights disputes arising from overlapping land certificates remain a complex agrarian law issue frequently encountered in Indonesia. This phenomenon reflects weaknesses in the land administration system, particularly in data collection, land measurement, and certificate issuance. Such disputes create conflicts, legal uncertainty, and reduced public trust in the land registration system. In practice, these disputes are generally resolved through civil litigation procedures in the District Court. This study aims to comprehensively analyze civil procedural law in resolving land rights disputes involving overlapping certificates and to examine the evidentiary strength of land certificates in judicial proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The findings indicate that dispute resolution begins with the filing of a lawsuit, followed by mediation, court examination, and the evidentiary process as the most crucial stage in determining lawful ownership. Land certificates serve as strong evidence; however, they are not absolute, as they may be challenged if administrative or substantive legal defects are identified. Judges play a central role in assessing certificate validity by considering land history, physical possession, good faith, and compliance with legal procedures. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of dispute resolution still requires improvement through better land administration, enhanced data accuracy, and stronger institutional integration.

This study aims to examine the influence of board characteristics (educational background, tenure diversity, age diversity, and board size) and ownership structure (institutional ownership and foreign ownership) on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. The theoretical basis for explaining the research findings is stakeholder theory and upper echelon theory. The data sample for this study is consumer sector companies, namely cyclical consumers and non-cyclical consumers listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2021-2024 period, with a total of 368 observations. The sample determination used nonprobability sampling techniques and purposive sampling methods. Data analysis in this study was conducted using multiple linear regression methods with the assistance of the EViews 13 software. The results show that educational background and foreign ownership have no effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, tenure diversity, age diversity, board size, and institutional ownership have a positive and significant effect on CSR disclosure. These findings support stakeholder theory, which emphasizes that companies are required to fulfill stakeholders’ information needs through transparent CSR disclosure. Furthermore, the research results also support the upper echelon theory which explains that the characteristics of the board of directors influence the company's strategic decision-making, including decisions related to CSR disclosure.

This study investigates the effects of institutional ownership (IO) and foreign ownership (FO) on the performance of non-financial firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2021 to 2025. Grounded in agency theory and the resource-based view, the study employs fixed-effects multiple regression with year and industry controls across the full sample (n = 3,621) and phase-partitioned subsamples representing the COVID-19 and post-pandemic periods. Additional threshold analyses are conducted to detect nonlinear ownership effects. The results reveal that institutional ownership exerts a negative effect on ROA, consistent with the entrenchment effect and the principal-principal conflict prevalent in Indonesia’s concentrated ownership environment. Conversely, foreign ownership demonstrates a positive and significant performance effect, supporting the hypotheses of governance and resource transfer. Both effects are concentrated in the post-pandemic period and are insignificant during the pandemic phase. Threshold analyses further establish that these relationships are nonlinear: the negative institutional ownership effect manifests at low-to-moderate concentration levels (10%–40%) and reverses to positive only beyond the 90% threshold, whereas the positive foreign ownership effect emerges only after crossing a critical mass of approximately 60%–70%. These findings contribute to the literature by demonstrating that the performance implications of block ownership are contingent on investor origin and ownership scale, with important implications for minority investor protection policy in emerging markets.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), financial performance, and Earning Per Share (EPS) on firm value. The object of this research consists of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2021–2024. This study employs a quantitative approach using secondary data in the form of annual financial statements as the primary source. The sample was selected using purposive sampling based on predetermined criteria, ensuring that only companies with complete data and consistent reporting were included in the analysis. The independent variables analyzed include the audit committee, independent commissioners, institutional ownership, Return on Assets (ROA), and Earning Per Share (EPS). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to process the data in this study, allowing the researchers to examine the simultaneous and partial effects of the variables on firm value. The findings indicate that firm value is significantly influenced by financial performance, particularly ROA, highlighting the importance of operational efficiency and profitability in enhancing shareholder wealth. While certain GCG variables such as institutional ownership showed positive influence, other elements like audit committees and independent commissioners produced mixed results, suggesting that governance mechanisms may have varying effects depending on organizational context. Meanwhile, EPS demonstrated inconsistent results in relation to firm value, implying that market perceptions of earnings may not fully capture the impact on overall firm valuation. This study provides insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers on the relative importance of governance and financial indicators in value creation for state-owned enterprises.

This study aims to analyze the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Firm Size, and Sales Growth on Financial Performance at PT Ace Hardware Indonesia Tbk listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2015–2024 period. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in this study is proxied by institutional ownership, financial performance is measured using Return on Assets (ROA), firm size is measured by the natural logarithm of total assets, and sales growth is measured using the sales growth ratio. This study employed a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The data used were secondary data in the form of annual financial statements obtained from the official websites of the IDX and the company. Data analysis techniques included descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple and simple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing consisting of t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination with the assistance of SPSS version 27 software. The results of the study indicate that partially, the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) variable has a t-value of -1.526 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. The firm size variable has a t-value of -2.857 > t-table 2.447, indicating a significant negative effect on the company’s financial performance. The sales growth variable has a t-value of 1.593 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. Simultaneously, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), firm size, and sales growth have a significant effect on financial performance, with an F-value of 13.023 > F-table 4.76 and a significance value of 0.005 < 0.05. This study is expected to provide consideration for management and investors in decision-making and serve as a reference for future research in related fields.

This study analyzes the effect of Integrated Reporting (IR) on the Cost of Equity (COE) by examining the moderating role of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020-2024 period. Governance quality is operationalized through two key mechanisms: institutional ownership and the proportion of independent board of commissioners. Employing Process Hayes Model 2 with bootstrap iterations of 5,000, and a final sample of 323 company-year observations after outlier removal, the study finds that Integrated Reporting does not exert a significant direct influence on Cost of Equity. However, the proportion of independent board of commissioners significantly moderates the negative relationship between Integrated Reporting and Cost of Equity, while institutional ownership fails to produce a significant moderating effect. Notably, under conditions of high institutional ownership paired with a low proportion of independent commissioners, Integrated Reporting paradoxically increases the Cost of Equity, underscoring the critical role of internal governance mechanisms in establishing the credibility of disclosed information. These findings confirm that the effectiveness of Integrated Reporting in reducing Cost of Equity is contingent upon the quality of the governance environment- particularly board independence. The study contributes to both theory and practice by demonstrating that the economic benefits of Integrated Reporting are realized only when accompanied by robust independent oversight structures.

The management of nonformal education programs increasingly demands socially grounded approaches capable of fostering inclusivity, sustainability, and community empowerment. This study aims to analyze the concept and implementation of social-based management within nonformal education systems, emphasizing participatory governance, social capital, and collaborative learning as strategic components of effective program administration. Employing a qualitative narrative review methodology, this research synthesizes empirical and conceptual findings from peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2025 to identify dominant themes, theoretical orientations, and emerging innovations in the field. The results reveal that social-based management strengthens institutional accountability,enhances program sustainability, and promotes shared ownership among community stakeholders. The integration of participatory management and social capital theories provides a conceptual foundation for improving nonformal education governance through collaboration, trust networks, and local knowledge mobilization. The study contributes theoretically by refining the framework of participatory educational management, and practically by offering guidance for policymakers and practitioners in designing community-driven education programs. These findings underscore the importance of socially embedded governance as a pathway toward inclusive, adaptive, and transformative nonformal education.

This study focuses on the elements of gharar (uncertainty), tadlis (fraud), and breach of contract in examining multiple transactions of a single land object from the standpoint of Islamic economic law. The rising frequency of disagreements over land purchases and sales brought on by the same seller engaging in overlapping transactions, unclear ownership status, and a lack of transparency has prompted this research. This study aims to investigate the effects of these activities on Indonesian positive law and Islamic economic law. This case study employed an empirical legal approach and was carried out in Grogol Village, Tulangan District, Sidoarjo Regency. Data was gathered through observation, interviews, and documentation by the buyer, seller, and local authorities. The findings indicate that due to unclear land boundaries and ownership status, the transaction contained significant elements of gharar and tadlis because the seller concealed important information about the previous transaction. Furthermore, the seller's failure to fulfill obligations stipulated in the contract constitutes a breach of contract under positive law. This study demonstrates that these practices not only violate legal regulations but also contradict the principles of Islamic economic law such as justice, transparency, and good faith. According to this study, legal awareness, administrative accuracy, and institutional oversight are vital to prevent such issues in the future.

This study explores how the integrated Resource-Based View (iRBV) and Dynamic Capabilities (DC) explain the early stage of SME internationalization in Indonesia. An exploratory single-case study design is employed on a koi-breeding SME that has engaged in export activities, using a Likert-scale questionnaire to identify VRIN resources, dynamic capabilities, export performance, and internationalization barriers. The findings indicate that the SME possesses relatively strong export market knowledge, network competence, and quality reputation, but remains weak in global certifications, administrative support, and logistical capacity. From a DC perspective, sensing and seizing capabilities are already developed, whereas transforming capability is still limited in terms of reconfiguring the business model, strengthening human resources, and institutionalizing export routines. Overall, the results underscore that the success of SME internationalization is determined not only by the ownership of internal resources, but also by the firm’s ability to reconfigure those resources in the presence of environmental and institutional constraint.

This study analyzes the influence of Green Accounting, Environmental Performance, and Corporate Governance on the Quality of Sustainability Reports in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Report quality is measured by the completeness and transparency of disclosures based on GRI Standards. A quantitative method is employed, using a purposive sample of manufacturing firms from the 2020- 2023 period. Data is analyzed using multiple regression analysis. Green Accounting is proxied by environmental costs, Environmental Performance by PROPER ratings, Corporate Governance by the proportion of independent commissioners and institutional ownership, while report quality is measured through content analysis. The hypothesized results indicate that all three independent variables are expected to have a significant positive effect on Sustainability Report Quality. The implementation of green accounting, good environmental performance, and strong governance are predicted to enhance the quality of sustainability disclosures. This research contributes to environmental accounting literature and offers practical implications for regulators, investors, and corporate management in the context of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting.

The study investigates the impact of governance on firm value, along with the moderating role of institutional ownership, among companies operating in the consumer cyclicals and consumer non-cyclicals sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the 2021-2023 period. Drawing on a sample of 42 companies and 126 observations, a quantitative panel data approach was adopted, with data gathered through purposive sampling. The Bloomberg Governance Score was used to measure governance, Tobin's Q served as a proxy for firm value, institutional ownership was the moderating variable, and firm size, leverage, and profitability were included as control variables. Model selection was conducted using the Chow and Hausman Tests in EViews 14, which indicated that the Random Effects Model (REM) was the most suitable estimation approach. The findings reveal that governance does not exert a significant influence on firm value. Furthermore, institutional ownership is unable to strengthen the relationship between governance and firm value. These results suggest that ESG-based governance signals have not yet been optimally absorbed by investors in the Indonesian capital market; hence, reinforcing governance reporting standards and enhancing investor ESG literacy are considered essential steps toward integrating non-financial information into investment decision-making.

Based on Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh, the Government of Aceh has been granted special authority to manage and regulate various governmental affairs, including land administration. This authority is specifically outlined in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter k, which empowers the Government of Aceh to handle land affairs that span across regencies and municipalities. This power is further reinforced by Presidential Regulation Number 23 of 2015, which transformed the Regional Office of the National Land Agency of Aceh into the Aceh Land Agency, and Qanun Aceh Number 13 of 2019 regarding the Establishment and Organizational Structure of Aceh Regional Apparatus, which laid the foundation for the establishment of the Aceh Land Office. This office is responsible for managing and certifying the Aceh Government’s land assets. This study aims to assess the implementation of the Aceh Land Office’s authority in certifying government land assets, the institutional synergy with the National Land Agency, and the challenges faced in ensuring legal certainty over these assets. The research employs an empirical juridical method with a sociological approach. Data were gathered from interviews with officials from the Aceh Land Office, the Aceh Financial Management Agency, and the National Land Agency, as well as secondary data from legal documents, books, and academic resources. The study found that while the certification process is legally supported, challenges such as incomplete ownership documents and limited resources hinder effective implementation. Measures, such as re-tracing and remapping land assets, are being taken to address these challenges.

This study explores the integration of community driven learning practices in the adoption of educational technology and its impact on sustainability. With the rapid advancement of digital tools and platforms, higher education institutions have increasingly adopted online and hybrid learning models to enhance teaching and learning. However, despite the potential benefits, aligning institutional goals with community needs remains a significant challenge. This research utilizes a mixed methods approach, combining stakeholder surveys, policy analysis, and comparative case studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both top down and community aligned adoption models. The findings reveal that community driven models, which involve local stakeholders in the decision making process, lead to higher engagement, better adoption rates, and greater long term sustainability compared to top down approaches. Stakeholders, including educators, students, and administrators, reported that participatory decision making fostered a sense of ownership and ensured the relevance of adopted technologies. The study also identifies key sustainability factors, including participatory decision making, long term community engagement, and contextual relevance, which are crucial for ensuring that educational technologies remain effective and beneficial over time. However, challenges such as resistance to change, lack of resources, and unequal access to technology were found to hinder the successful implementation of sustainable models. The research concludes with practical recommendations for educational institutions and policymakers to adopt community aligned models and ensure equitable access to technology. Future research directions are suggested to further explore the balance between institutional innovation and community driven learning, with a focus on long term outcomes and the adaptability of these models across different educational contexts.

This study aims to examine the effect of leverage and institutional ownership on tax avoidance, with profitability as a moderating variable, in plantation sector and mining sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2020–2024 period. This study employs a quantitative research method. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique, resulting in 16 companies as the research sample, with a total of 80 observations. Data analysis is conducted using multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis (MRA). The results indicate that leverage and institutional ownership do not have a significant effect on tax avoidance. Furthermore, profitability is unable to moderate the relationship between leverage and tax avoidance as well as between institutional ownership and tax avoidance. This study has limitations related to the relatively small sample size, as many companies experienced losses during the observation period and therefore did not meet the sample selection criteria.

An essential stage in road infrastructure development is land acquisition, which frequently causes project delays due to its complex legal, social, and economic challenges. This study aims to identify the factors that hinder the land acquisition process in the Manado Outer Ring Road (MORR) 3 Phase 4 Construction Project and to assess how these constraints affect the progress of construction activities. The research was conducted using a qualitative case study approach, with data collected through field observations, document reviews, and interviews. The findings indicate that delays in land acquisition are caused by discrepancies in legal status and land ownership, differing perceptions of compensation value, insufficient public socialization, and weak institutional coordination. These issues lead to disruptions in the construction schedule and potential increases in project costs. The study demonstrates that land acquisition necessitates a more cohesive strategy, facilitated by enhanced communication and community engagement, fortified land acquisition management frameworks, and precise verification of ownership data. The results indicate that there must be broader mitigation strategies to prevent similar challenges in future infrastructure projects.

This research aims to investigate the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which are measured by 3 indicators; institutional ownership, managerial ownership, board indeoendence, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Tax Avoidance in Multinational Companies on Indonesia. The study used multiple linear regression with periods start from 2022 until 2024. The sample of this study is a multinational companies in Indonesia with the total of 47 samples for 3 years, the criteria of the company can be said multinational companies is if the companies had a entities in more than one country. Tax avoidance is measured using the Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR), while GCG variables and CSR disclosure are measured based on relevant ownership structures, board composition, and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) index. The result shows that Institutional ownership had a significantly negative effect of tax avoidance, while the other three independent variables had no significant power in Tax Avoidance. This study concludes that tax avoidance in multinational companies is a complex phenomenon influenced by various internal and external factors beyond the scope of this research. The findings provide practical implications for regulators and investors and suggest that future research should consider additional variables, longer observation periods, and alternative tax avoidance proxies.

This study investigates the determinants of dividend payout policy in energy sector firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2020–2024 period. Dividend policy is a critical issue in emerging markets, especially in capital-intensive industries with high investment needs and earnings volatility. The research examines whether profitability and ownership structure—specifically institutional and managerial ownership—significantly influence dividend payout decisions, considering firm characteristics. The study analyzes the effect of profitability, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership on the dividend payout ratio, while controlling for firm size and leverage. A quantitative approach is used, employing pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression on 245 firm-year observations. Dividend payout ratio is measured as dividend per share divided by earnings per share, profitability is proxied by return on equity, and ownership variables are expressed as shareholding proportions. Descriptive analysis and classical assumption tests precede hypothesis testing. The results show that profitability positively and significantly affects dividend payout, suggesting that firms with better financial performance tend to distribute higher dividends. Firm size also positively influences dividend policy, while leverage negatively impacts it, reflecting the role of financial capacity and capital structure. However, institutional and managerial ownership do not show significant effects on dividend payout decisions. The findings indicate that dividend policy in Indonesian energy firms is primarily driven by financial performance and structural characteristics rather than ownership-based governance mechanisms. This study offers sector-specific evidence that refines agency and signaling perspectives on dividend policy in emerging markets, with practical implications for managers, investors, and regulators.

This study try to examine the impact of institutional, managerial, and public kepemilikan structures on the level of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX between 2020 and 2024. This study's findings are supported by increasing transparency and business continuity, also in guiding ESG practices. The research method that is used is quantitative analysis using panel regression analysis. The study's sample consists of 27 manufacturing companies selected using the purposive sampling method, yielding a total of 135 observations over of a few years. The analysis's findings indicate that all the ownership do not significantly affect ESG. Conversely, company size and employee productivity as control variables have a positive impact on the ESG threshold. This shows the structure of kepemilikan is not the most important factor in determining ESG transparency for Indonesian manufacturing companies, which are primarily focused on the importance of jangka pendek. Implicitasi penelitian ini mengindikasi bahwa pengungkapan ESG is more negatively impacted by internal company capacity than by stock composition, therefore external regulations and technical assistance are crucial factors in guiding business operations.