Publication Search

Financial distress has become a critical issue for companies operating in highly competitive and capital-intensive industries, making effective corporate governance and the efficient utilization of intangible resources increasingly important for ensuring long-term financial sustainability. This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Distress and to investigate the mediating role of Intellectual Capital in this relationship. The research employs a quantitative explanatory approach using panel data from 23 energy and mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2021–2024 period, resulting in 92 firm-year observations. Secondary data obtained from annual reports and financial statements were analyzed using descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, panel regression analysis, and mediation analysis. The findings indicate that Good Corporate Governance has a significant negative effect on Financial Distress, suggesting that stronger governance practices improve financial stability and reduce the likelihood of financial difficulties. Intellectual Capital also demonstrates a significant negative effect on Financial Distress and partially mediates the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and Financial Distress. These findings imply that effective governance combined with the strategic management of intellectual resources enhances organizational resilience and supports sustainable corporate performance. The study contributes to the literature by integrating governance quality and intellectual capital into a single framework for explaining financial distress and provides practical insights for managers, investors, and policymakers in strengthening corporate sustainability.

Firm value reflects investors’ assessment of a company’s performance and future prospects, making it an important indicator in the capital market. In the food and beverage sector, firm value is influenced by various internal factors, including the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), earnings management practices, and profitability. Previous studies examining the relationships among these variables have produced inconsistent findings, creating a need for further investigation. This research examines the influence of Good Corporate Governance and earnings management on firm value through profitability as an intervening variable in food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2020–2024 period. The study employed a quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from annual financial reports. A purposive sampling technique was applied, resulting in 30 companies with 150 observations. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and path analysis. The findings indicate that Good Corporate Governance and earnings management do not significantly affect profitability. Good Corporate Governance has a significant effect on firm value, while earnings management does not significantly influence firm value. Profitability demonstrates a positive and significant effect on firm value. Furthermore, profitability is unable to mediate the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and firm value but is able to mediate the relationship between earnings management and firm value. These findings highlight the importance of profitability as a determinant of firm value and provide implications for investors in evaluating corporate performance.

Stock prices are an important indicator influencing investment decision-making. High stock prices reflect positive market perceptions of company performance and increase investor interest in investing. This study aims to analyze the influence of Return on Equity (ROE), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on stock prices of cosmetic and household goods companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2019–2023. The sampling method used purposive sampling with a total of 6 companies or n = 36. The data used are secondary data in the form of annual financial statements and stock prices. The analytical method applied is multiple linear regression using IBM SPSS version 29. The results show that partially ROE and GCG have no significant effect on stock prices, DER has a significant negative effect, while CSR has a significant positive effect on stock prices. Simultaneously, ROE, DER, CSR, and GCG significantly affect stock prices. These findings highlight that leverage and corporate social responsibility play an important role in determining the market value of companies in the cosmetics and household goods industry.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), financial performance, and Earning Per Share (EPS) on firm value. The object of this research consists of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2021–2024. This study employs a quantitative approach using secondary data in the form of annual financial statements as the primary source. The sample was selected using purposive sampling based on predetermined criteria, ensuring that only companies with complete data and consistent reporting were included in the analysis. The independent variables analyzed include the audit committee, independent commissioners, institutional ownership, Return on Assets (ROA), and Earning Per Share (EPS). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to process the data in this study, allowing the researchers to examine the simultaneous and partial effects of the variables on firm value. The findings indicate that firm value is significantly influenced by financial performance, particularly ROA, highlighting the importance of operational efficiency and profitability in enhancing shareholder wealth. While certain GCG variables such as institutional ownership showed positive influence, other elements like audit committees and independent commissioners produced mixed results, suggesting that governance mechanisms may have varying effects depending on organizational context. Meanwhile, EPS demonstrated inconsistent results in relation to firm value, implying that market perceptions of earnings may not fully capture the impact on overall firm valuation. This study provides insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers on the relative importance of governance and financial indicators in value creation for state-owned enterprises.

This study aims to analyze the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Firm Size, and Sales Growth on Financial Performance at PT Ace Hardware Indonesia Tbk listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2015–2024 period. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in this study is proxied by institutional ownership, financial performance is measured using Return on Assets (ROA), firm size is measured by the natural logarithm of total assets, and sales growth is measured using the sales growth ratio. This study employed a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The data used were secondary data in the form of annual financial statements obtained from the official websites of the IDX and the company. Data analysis techniques included descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple and simple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing consisting of t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination with the assistance of SPSS version 27 software. The results of the study indicate that partially, the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) variable has a t-value of -1.526 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. The firm size variable has a t-value of -2.857 > t-table 2.447, indicating a significant negative effect on the company’s financial performance. The sales growth variable has a t-value of 1.593 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. Simultaneously, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), firm size, and sales growth have a significant effect on financial performance, with an F-value of 13.023 > F-table 4.76 and a significance value of 0.005 < 0.05. This study is expected to provide consideration for management and investors in decision-making and serve as a reference for future research in related fields.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms, proxied by the Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee, as well as Environmental Performance on Financial Performance in food and beverage manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020-2023 period. The research method used is quantitative, with a purposive sampling technique that resulted in 22 companies as samples, totaling 88 observations over the four-year study period. The research data is secondary data obtained through financial statements and annual reports from the official IDX website. Literature reviews indicate inconsistencies in previous studies; however, the hypothesis of this research suggests that the Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, and Environmental Performance have a positive and significant effect on the company's financial performance. The board of commissioners and audit committee play a role in strengthening the oversight function to minimize agency costs and improve efficiency. Meanwhile, good environmental performance, measured through PROPER ratings, is expected to enhance the company's positive image in the eyes of investors and stakeholders. 

This study aims to analyze the influence of sustainability reporting, good corporate governance (GCG), and company size on the value of companies with financial performance as a mediating variable in energy sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research approach uses quantitative methods with causality design, as well as secondary data in the form of financial statements and sustainability reports. The research sample consisted of 60 observations obtained through purposive sampling techniques. The analysis was carried out by descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, and mediation tests using the Sobel Test. The results of the study show that sustainability reporting, GCG, and company size have a positive and significant effect on financial performance. Furthermore, financial performance has been proven to have a positive effect on the company's value. In the full model, all independent variables together with financial performance have a significant effect on the company's value. The mediation test confirmed that financial performance partially mediated the relationship between sustainability reporting, GCG, and company size to the company's value. These findings confirm that improving the quality of sustainability reporting, implementing good governance, and optimizing company size can increase company value both directly and through financial performance. The implication of this research is the need for energy sector companies to strengthen transparency, governance, and efficiency of asset management to increase attractiveness in the eyes of investors.

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Accounting, Intellectual Capital, and Firm Size on Financial Performance with Good Corporate Governance as a moderating variable. This study was conducted on mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for a five-year period, namely 2020–2024. The study population consisted of 34 mining companies, with the sampling method using purposive sampling, resulting in 33 companies as research samples. The information used was derived from secondary sources, namely annual reports and sustainability reports.  Multiple linear regression and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) were used to analyze the data, with the assistance of EViews software. The results showed that Corporate Social Responsibility had a positive and significant effect on Financial Performance. Green Accounting and Intellectual Capital also had a positive and significant effect on Corporate Social Responsibility. Meanwhile, Firm Size had a positive but insignificant effect on Financial Performance. The results of the moderation test indicate that Good Corporate Governance is unable to moderate the influence of CSR, Green Accounting, Intellectual Capital, or Firm Size on Financial Performance. This finding suggests that increasing social responsibility, implementing green accounting, and managing intellectual capital can improve the financial performance of mining companies, but their effectiveness has not been strengthened by corporate governance mechanisms.

This study examines the factors that cause fraud in financial reporting. The study analyzed 195 data points from 39 financial institutions listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2019 to 2023 using a purposive sampling technique. The research applied multiple linear regression analysis to analyze the impact of governance independence and performance variables on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. The independent variables include financial targets assessed by profitability (return on assets [ROA]), financial stability measured by changes in assets, external pressure measured by the debt-to-equity ratio (DER), and the proportion of independent commissioners as a measure of good corporate governance. The study proves that financial targets affect fraudulent financial reporting, while financial stability, external pressure, and independent commissioners do not influence fraudulent financial reporting. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for regulators, investors, and management to enhance oversight and reduce the risk of fraud in the banking sector.

This study aims to analyze and evaluate the health level of PT Bank Mega Tbk during the 2016–2023 period using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RGEC) method. This research employs a quantitative descriptive approach with an evaluative design. The data used are secondary data obtained from audited annual financial statements published by PT Bank Mega Tbk and the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The analytical method refers to regulatory provisions by Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority, covering four assessment factors: Risk Profile (measured by Non-Performing Loan and Loan to Deposit Ratio), Good Corporate Governance (based on self-assessment reports), Earnings (measured by Return on Assets, Return on Equity, BOPO, and Net Interest Margin), and Capital (measured by Capital Adequacy Ratio). Each indicator is assessed according to regulatory criteria and integrated to determine the Composite Rating (PK). The results show that PT Bank Mega Tbk consistently achieved Composite Rating 1 (PK-1), categorized as “Very Healthy,” throughout the observation period. The Risk Profile, Capital, and most Earnings indicators demonstrate strong and stable performance, while Good Corporate Governance remains consistently in the “Healthy” category. However, the Return on Equity indicator shows relatively lower performance compared to other profitability ratios, indicating the need for more optimal utilization of equity. Overall, the findings confirm the bank’s strong financial resilience while highlighting managerial implications related to capital efficiency.

This research aimed to examine the effect of environmental accounting disclosure and good corporate governance mechanisms on the financial performance of basic industry and chemical manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2021-2023. This research used a quantitative causal approach with multiple linear regression data analysis to examine the relationship between environmental accounting disclosure and good corporate governance mechanisms (managerial ownership, institutional ownership, independent board of commissioners, and audit committee) on financial performance. The research data was obtained from secondary data in the form of financial reports and annual reports of the companies included in the sample. The results of this research indicated that, partially, environmental accounting disclosure did not have a significant effect on financial performance. Good corporate governance mechanisms, namely managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and independent boards of commissioners, did not have a significant effect on financial performance. Meanwhile, audit committees did not have a significant effect on financial performance. Simultaneously, environmental accounting disclosure and good corporate governance mechanisms had a significant effect on financial performance.

This study aims to evaluate the financial condition of four private banks, namely Bank Mega, Bank JTrust, Bank Danamon, and Bank Panin listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2015 to 2024. The analysis uses the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) approach with a quantitative method, where the data source is derived from published annual financial statements. The sampling technique was carried out by purposive sampling with the criteria of financial statements available for the last 10 years and the fluctuations in profits in the last three years. The bank's health assessment is carried out through four main aspects. First, the risk profile is measured using non-performing loan (NPL) ratios and liquidity levels through the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR). Second, Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is evaluated based on regulatory compliance and transparency reporting. Third, profitability which includes the return on asset ratio (ROA) and net interest margin (Net Interest Margin / NIM). Fourth, the capital aspect is analyzed through the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of the study show that in general, the four banks are in a healthy condition, especially in terms of capital and governance, which reflects the bank's ability to meet the minimum capital requirements and maintain management practices in accordance with banking industry standards. However, significant differences were found in the risk and profitability aspects. Banks that have less than optimal risk management tend to experience an increase in NPLs, while banks that are more efficient in managing operational costs are able to maintain ROA and NIM at a more stable level. In addition, external factors such as global economic conditions, monetary policy, interest rates, and interbank competition also affect financial performance.

This study aims to analyze the influence of board size and profitability on the financial performance of industrial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2021-2024 period. Board size is measured by the number of board members, while profitability is proxied by Return on Assets (ROA). Financial performance is assessed using Return on Equity (ROE), a common metric for evaluating the effectiveness of a company’s operations. The study population includes all industrial companies listed on the IDX during the specified period. The sampling technique employed is purposive sampling, which selects a representative sample based on specific criteria relevant to the study. Data for the analysis were sourced from the annual financial reports published by the companies. Panel data regression analysis was used for data analysis, supported by statistical software, to explore the relationship between the independent variables (board size and profitability) and the dependent variable (financial performance). The study finds that board size and profitability are crucial factors that can influence the financial performance of industrial companies. Larger boards may contribute to better decision-making and governance, while higher profitability can indicate efficient use of resources and positively affect financial outcomes. The results of this study are expected to provide empirical evidence on the role of corporate governance, particularly regarding board size and profitability, in shaping the financial performance of industrial companies in Indonesia. By understanding these relationships, the study aims to contribute to the broader discussion on improving corporate governance and financial performance in emerging markets.

Good Corporate Governance (GCG) refers to the practices and processes that guide a company's operations and decision-making, significantly influencing its financial performance. This study employs secondary and quantitative data, utilizing the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, with sources obtained from the Google Scholar website. The research focuses on the impact of the Independent Board of Commissioners, the Audit Committee, and Managerial Ownership on financial performance. The findings indicate that effective corporate governance, particularly the presence of an independent Board of Commissioners, positively influences financial performance as assessed by Return on Assets (ROA). Additionally, the Audit Committee is shown to have a significant and positive effect on financial performance. In contrast, while Managerial Ownership does not appear to impact financial performance when evaluated through ROA, it does exhibit a positive correlation when assessed using Tobin's Q. This suggests that higher managerial ownership can enhance market perceptions of the company's long-term value and stability. The study concludes that the successful implementation of Good Corporate Governance practices can lead to improved financial performance for companies. Conversely, inadequate execution of these governance principles may result in diminished financial performance and overall company value. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to prioritize and effectively implement GCG to foster better financial outcomes and enhance their market standing. This research underscores the importance of governance structures in shaping financial results and highlights the need for companies to focus on governance practices to achieve sustainable growth and value creation. Ultimately, the study emphasizes that a strong commitment to GCG can lead to increased investor confidence and long-term success in the competitive business landscape.

The capital market is crucial for fostering a nation's economic growth, serving as both a financing source for enterprises and an investment avenue for the public. Stock prices serve as a vital sign of investors' thoughts about a company's future potential. Stock price volatility is significantly affected by several variables, including Good Corporate Governance (GCG), capital structure, and financial performance. This research seeks to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), capital structure, and financial performance on the stock prices of financial sector firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2024. The used research methodology is a quantitative approach using multiple linear regression analysis tools.    The study's findings indicate that the three independent factors significantly influence stock prices, both individually and together. The Adjusted R² value of 0.256 indicates that the three variables account for 25.6% of the variations in stock prices, whereas the remaining variance is affected by external factors not examined in this research. These results provide theoretical and practical advantages, particularly for investors in decision-making, for enterprises in financial management and governance, and for future researchers as a foundation for further research endeavours.

This study aims to analyze the effect of Good Corporate Governance mechanisms on financial performance in infrastructure sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2019-2023 period. The GCG mechanism in question includes institutional ownership, board of directors, board of commissioners, and audit committee. The company's financial performance is measured using the Return on Assets (ROA) indicator. This research approach uses quantitative methods with panel data regression analysis techniques. The population in this study consisted of all infrastructure companies listed on the IDX during the observation period, and purposive sampling technique was used to determine the sample in accordance with certain criteria. The test results show that partially, only the audit committee variable has a positive and significant effect on financial performance. Meanwhile, the variables of institutional ownership, board of directors, and board of commissioners did not show a significant effect. These findings reinforce the importance of the audit committee's role in overseeing and ensuring effective governance to support the improvement of the company's financial performance.

This research aims to obtain empirical evidence on the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on financial performance. CSR and GCG are measured using data from the 2020–2022 period, while financial performance, proxied by Return on Assets (ROA), is analyzed for the 2021–2023 period. The object of this research is mining sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The sample was selected using purposive sampling, resulting in 17 companies with a total of 51 observational data points over three years. The data analysis technique used in this research is multiple linear regression analysis. The results show that CSR and GCG have a positive effect on the financial performance of the companies. These findings indicate that effective implementation of CSR and GCG can enhance a company's legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders, thereby contributing to improved financial performance in the subsequent period.

This study aims to analyze the influence of working capital management, leverage, and institutional ownership on the profitability of consumer goods companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2019–2023 period, while also examining company size as a moderating variable. The consumer goods sector, which has a large market potential in Indonesia, makes it essential to understand how these financial aspects affect company performance. Working capital management plays a crucial role in maintaining liquidity and operational efficiency, leverage determines the extent to which companies rely on debt financing, and institutional ownership reflects external monitoring that can drive managerial discipline. Company size is considered a moderating factor that could strengthen or weaken these relationships, especially in influencing profitability levels. Using a quantitative approach, the research findings reveal that each of the main variables—working capital management, leverage, and institutional ownership—partially and significantly affects profitability. More specifically, company size is found to moderate the effect of leverage on profitability, indicating that larger firms may be better positioned to optimize debt usage compared to smaller firms. This study not only provides empirical evidence regarding financial determinants of profitability but also enriches the discussion on how moderating factors such as firm size can influence the dynamics of corporate financial performance. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights for stakeholders, including managers seeking to optimize financial policies, investors evaluating company performance, and academics or researchers interested in exploring further implications for corporate governance and financial strategy in emerging markets like Indonesia. In conclusion, the study highlights the importance of managing financial variables strategically to sustain profitability in the highly competitive consumer goods industry.

This research aims to test and analyze the influence of good corporate governance on company financial performance. Good corporate governance in this research is proxied by the percentage of institutional ownership, composition of the board of directors and composition of independent commissioners. The financial performance of banking companies is measured by Return on Equity (ROE). The population used in this research was the Influence of the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Performance (Studies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2017-2020) totaling 626. The sample selection technique used purposive sampling so that 52 companies were obtained. The type of data used is secondary data. The data analysis technique in this research uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this research partially show that the percentage of institutional ownership, composition of the board of directors, and composition of independent commissioners do not have a significant effect with a negative coefficient on ROE. Meanwhile, simultaneously the percentage of institutional ownership, composition of the board of directors and composition of independent commissioners have a significant effect on ROE with a positive coefficient.

This study aims to examine the effect of the implementation of good corporate governance and the competence of the board of directors in banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2023. This study is a type of quantitative research using secondary data from the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the official website of each company. The sampling method used purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 12 companies with an observation period of 5 years so that the number of research samples was 57 data. The data analysis technique used was multiple linear regression using SPSS 27 software. Based on the results of the study, it was found that managerial ownership had an effect on financial performance. However, this study did not find any influence between the board it-related background variables and institutional ownership on financial performance.