Publication Search

This research aims to deeply understand the legal differences between zakat and waqf from the perspective of contemporary fiqh, as well as to analyze their relevance and application in the context of modern social, economic, and technological settings. This research uses a comparative analysis method with a descriptive qualitative approach based on literature study. The sources examined include classical fiqh literature from the four schools of thought, contemporary scholars' views, as well as modern regulations and fatwas related to zakat and waqf in Indonesia. The research findings indicate that although zakat and waqf have fundamental differences in legal status, form, and purpose of utilization, both share a common spirit of wealth distribution and community empowerment. Moreover, contemporary issues such as professional zakat, corporate zakat, stock zakat, cash waqf, productive waqf, and digitalization highlight the need for institutional renewal and strengthening to ensure that the laws of zakat and waqf remain relevant and effective in the modern era. This research concludes that understanding and managing zakat and waqf in an adaptive manner to the times is very important in realizing sustainable community welfare.

Marriage in Islamic law is governed by various provisions related to mahram, one of which is the prohibition of marrying a wife’s child from a previous marriage, known as "rabaib." This study aims to analyze the views of the four Sunni schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali) regarding the prohibition of marrying rabaib in Islamic family law. Using a comparative approach, this research examines the legal basis, evidence, and implications of the prohibition according to each school. The findings show that all four schools agree that a husband cannot marry the child of his wife from a previous marriage (rabaib), as long as the child is unmarried or has not been divorced. This view is based on the mahram principle as outlined in the Qur'an, which prohibits marrying a stepchild due to the marital relationship with their mother. However, there are differences in the rules regarding the maintenance and care of the wife’s child in some schools of thought. This study concludes that the prohibition of marrying rabaib in the four schools is based on the principle of protecting family rights, as well as maintaining honor and justice in family relationships, while prioritizing the application of law based on principles of fairness and welfare for all parties involved.  

Tahlil marriage is a marriage carried out with the aim that a woman who has been divorced three times by her husband can remarry her first husband after marrying and divorcing her second husband. This is a matter of debate in Islamic law, especially from the perspective of the four main schools of thought: Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hambali. This research aims to analyze tahlil marriage law according to the views of the four schools of thought using a normative approach. The research method used is library research by examining classical and contemporary jurisprudence books as well as the opinions of ulama.The results of the research show that the majority of ulama from four schools of thought agree that if a tahlil marriage is carried out with conditions and an initial agreement to divorce after the contract, then the marriage is considered void or haram because it violates the principles of marriage in Islam. However, if the marriage occurs without a prior agreement to divorce, then the law is valid. The conclusion of this research confirms that the deliberate and planned practice of tahlil marriage is contrary to the principle of the validity of marriage in Islam. Therefore, it is important for Muslims to understand marriage laws in accordance with Islamic teachings so as not to be trapped in practices that are not valid according to sharia.

This study aims to determine the concept of haul in the perspective of four schools of thought. This research is a type of qualitative research with library research methods. This study uses a normative language and juridical approach. The data are sourced from various literature explorers whose sources are journals, books and proceedings. Data analysis is used by tracing various literatures from articles, books, proceedings and other relevant, analyzing and drawing conclusions. The results of the study are that First, according to the agreement of the scholars, among them according to the four schools of thought that haul is not required for agricultural and fruit zakat. Second, the concept of expediting the payment of zakat before the haul during the pandemic, there is no difference among the four schools of thought, in fact what is wrong is the paradigm of society, the way of thinking, the way of understanding their knowledge is wrong, therefore there must be an effort to reshuffle the paradigm through reformulation of the zakat haul in the future. pandemic, namely the adjustment of the zakat haul during the pandemic.