Publication Search

This study explores the application and violation of Grice's conversational maxims in the animated films "Finding Nemo" (2003) and "Finding Dory" (2016). Grice's maximsquantity, quality, relation, and manner are key to effective communication in pragmatics. The research analyzes how these maxims are followed or flouted by the characters, affecting humor, tension, and narrative flow. Through a qualitative approach, the study identifies specific instances of adherence and violation, examining their impact on character development and audience engagement. The findings indicate that flouting the maxim of quantity often creates humor, while manipulating the maxim of relation generates suspense. This analysis demonstrates the role of conversational maxims in enhancing storytelling and character interactions in animated films, contributing to their narrative and entertainment value.

In communication, people should be cooperative to avoid misunderstanding. Meanwhile, from the non-cooperation of Grice's theory of cooperative principle. Violating maxim means the speaker does not observe the maxim not in purpose. The flouting maxim implies that the speaker does not observe the maxim purposefully. This research analyzes the non-cooperative principle used by Podcast Dedy Corbuzier Scene Widi Viera-Cinta Laura. The researcher chooses this podcast because it can involves a conversation between a host and a guest star that discuss about a certain topic, the speaker might break the maxim of cooperative principle in delivering the message and providing information to the listener. This research was conducted by using descriptive qualitative. The present study aims 1) To find out flouting and violation maxim are used in Dedy Corbuzier’s YouTube Channel, and 2) To describe the reason why flouted and violation maxims occur in Podcast Dedy Corbuzier scene Widi Viera – Cinta Laura. The results that the researcher found are that out of 36 data, 14 were flouting a maxims, 22 were violation a maxims. From the result above, violation maxim was the most similar. Violating maxim means the speaker does not observe the maxim not in purpose , maxim quantity that cause speakers not to give enough information to a listener. Whereas in Flouting maxim happened because the speakers failed to obey maxim on purpose. Based on the data of flouting maxim of realtion most dominantly used that causes speakers want to change the topic and reveal the hidden meaning behind the utterances.    

Flouting maxim is one of flout language kinds that usually happened in social community. The aim of this research is to find out the kinds of flouting maxim usage in komedi moderen gokil. This research uses qualitative method due to analyze data does not statistic but words description. In data collection, researcher uses primary and secondary data. Researcher uses observation method. According to Sudaryanto (1998:33) observation method is the same as simak method. The technique used is simak bebas libat cakap. In analyzing data, the researcher uses padan technique. The researcher found 20 data that are classified into four kinds of flouting maxim in comedi moderen gokil movie. They are flouting maxim quality, flouting maxim quantity, flouting maxim relevant and flouting maxim manner. Researcher found that the most flouting maxim used is flouting maxim of relevant and the most rarely used is flouting maxim of manner. Beside, the researcher found the domain language of flouting maxim in comedi moderen gokil movie namely domain working, domain family, domain holiday and domain dance place.