Publication Search

Poverty in Indonesia remains an unresolved social problem and poses a structural challenge to the government. Improving the quality of life of vulnerable communities requires deeper intervention. Therefore, to assist and improve the quality of life of vulnerable communities, the government has launched various assistance programs, one of which is the Family Hope Program (PKH). The Family Hope Program (PKH) is present not only to support the community's economy but also encourages behavioral changes in PKH beneficiaries, particularly in the context of children's education, maternal and toddler health, and protection for vulnerable groups. This program is implemented in various areas of Surabaya City, one of which is the Sidotopo Village, Semampir. In this area, there are still underprivileged groups. The PKH program has significantly assisted beneficiaries in the Sidotopo area in improving their socio-economic welfare. The purpose of this evaluation is to describe the implementation of PKH in terms of effectiveness, equity, targeting accuracy, and the impact of program implementation on beneficiaries in the Sidotopo area. This evaluation uses data collection techniques based on observations and interviews with PKH mentors and PKH beneficiaries in the Sidotopo Village, as well as documentation studies. Based on the research results, it is clear that the implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Sidotopo has been effective, equitable, and well-targeted in improving the welfare of its residents. This is evident in the decline in poverty rates and increased access to education and healthcare.

The Family Hope Program (PKH) is one of the main instruments of social protection policies in Indonesia that aims to reduce poverty through conditional social assistance. However, in its implementation, this program still faces various problems related to the accuracy of the aid distribution targets, especially in urban areas such as Jagakarsa District, South Jakarta. This study aims to analyze various problems in the distribution of PKH social assistance, assess their impact on the effectiveness of poverty alleviation, and identify strategies that can ensure targeted assistance. The approach used is qualitative descriptive with a case study method, through data collection techniques in the form of in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and documentation of PKH companions, Beneficiary Families (KPM), and village officials in Jagakarsa District. The results of the study show that although PKH has provided real benefits for most KPMs, its implementation is still constrained by inaccurate data, limited capacity of companions, low digital literacy, and weak coordination between agencies. On the other hand, targeted distribution of assistance has been proven to increase access to education and health, improve household economic conditions, and encourage behavioral changes towards independence. Therefore, an integrated strategy is needed including strengthening the capacity of social companions, digitizing the distribution system, active community participation, and local culture-based empowerment education to ensure the long-term effectiveness of PKH in reducing poverty rates.

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in alleviating poverty, with a case study focus on Sei Jang Village, Tanjungpinang City. PKH is a social assistance program initiated by the government to improve the welfare of the poor through conditional cash assistance. The reason the researcher chose this title was to determine the extent to which PKH is effective in reducing poverty, especially since data shows a decline in the number of PKH recipients in Sei Jang Village in 2023. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method, where data is obtained through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation studies. To measure the level of effectiveness, the theory from (Makmur, 2015) was used, which states that the elements of effectiveness include accuracy in timing, accuracy in calculation, accuracy in measurement, accuracy in decision making, accuracy in thinking, accuracy in carrying out orders, accuracy in determining goals, and accuracy in targeting. The results of the study show that PKH has had a positive impact on reducing the economic burden on poor families, particularly in meeting the educational and health needs of children. However, the effectiveness of this program is still hampered by several factors, such as delays in fund disbursement, participants' lack of understanding of the program's terms and conditions, and minimal assistance from relevant officials. In addition, another challenge in the form of inaccuracy in targeting beneficiaries also affects the overall achievement of the program. These findings indicate that better management and supervision are urgently needed. This study concludes that although PKH contributes significantly to poverty alleviation, improvements in management and supervision are needed to maximize the program's objectives. The proposed recommendations include increasing the capacity of social workers, improving the beneficiary selection mechanism, and strengthening coordination among stakeholders at the local level.