Publication Search

This study evaluates the implementation of Government Regulation Number 94 of 2021 concerning Civil Servant Discipline, assessing its impact on enhancing the effectiveness and accountability of public administration within Sidoarjo Regency. Civil servant discipline constitutes a critical instrument in bureaucratic reform oriented towards good governance and high-quality public services. This research employs a qualitative approach utilising William Dunn's policy evaluation model, which encompasses the dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, responsiveness, and appropriateness. Data were collected through documentary analysis of prevailing legislation, local government performance reports, SAKIP (Government Agency Performance Accountability System) reports, SPIP (Government Internal Control System) reports, and digital human resource management system documents. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively, employing source triangulation to ensure the validity of the findings. The evaluation results indicate that Government Regulation 94/2021 is effective in reducing work procedure deviations, enhancing public service consistency, and strengthening accountability through clear audit trails. Integration with the 'Smart ASN' (State Civil Apparatus) and 'e-Kinerja' (e-Performance) systems reinforces the objectivity of performance assessments and minimises subjectivity. However, challenges persist regarding aspects of organisational culture, supervisory capacity, and the quality of infraction documentation. This study concludes that consistent disciplinary enforcement, when integrated with performance management systems, serves as a driving force for bureaucratic effectiveness and accountability. It further accelerates the consolidation of regional bureaucratic reform, fostering a bureaucracy that is professional, maintains high integrity, and is responsive to societal needs.

This study aims to analyze the impact of the implementation of the Government Internal Control Sistem (SPIP) on financial performance at the Regional Revenue Agency (Bapenda) of Malang City from 2022 to 2024. SPIP consists of five key components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Financial performance is measured using indicators from the Government Institution Performance Accountability Sistem (SAKIP), which reflects how well the government institution achieves its financial goals and objectives. This study uses a quantitative approach with an explanatory method, where data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to 34 Bapenda employees in Malang City. The collected data was then analyzed using SPSS version 25 to examine the relationship between SPIP implementation and financial performance. The results indicate that four of the five SPIP components, namely risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring, have a positive and significant impact on financial performance. This means that the better the implementation of these components, the better the financial performance achieved by Bapenda Malang City. However, the control environment component does not significantly affect financial performance. This suggests that while the control environment is important, other factors such as operational control and communication play a more dominant role in supporting financial performance. Based on these findings, several recommendations for Bapenda Malang City include strengthening SPIP implementation by conducting regular coaching and outreach programs. Additionally, it is recommended to hold workshops with all work units, provide technical training to develop dashboards, and establish clear Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and flowcharts. Setting up a schedule for SOP publication and routine briefings, as well as developing performance indicators and quarterly evaluation checklists, is expected to enhance SPIP implementation and strengthen financial accountability at Bapenda Malang City.

This study aims to analyze the effect of the implementation of the Government Agency Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) on the performance of the Sikka Regency DPRD Secretariat in 2023. The approach to this study is descriptive qualitative using primary and secondary data. Data were collected through interviews, observations and documentation of SAKIP reports. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of SAKIP has not been fully optimal, especially in terms of collecting performance data and following up on evaluation results as a basis for providing rewards and punishments. This study recommends the development of SOPs for performance measurement and utilization of evaluation results as strategic steps to improve agency accountability and performance.

The performance accountability evaluation (SAKIP) is crucial for assessing the success and shortcomings of government institutions in fulfilling their tasks and functions. This study evaluates the SAKIP implementation in the Regional Public Hospital (RSUD) Dr. Mohamad Soewandhie in Surabaya City. Through qualitative research methods, the study examines the planning, measurement, reporting, and internal performance accountability evaluation. The findings reveal that RSUD Dr. Mohamad Soewandhie demonstrates a high level of performance accountability, scoring an overall rating of 92.20 out of 100, categorized as "very satisfactory." Factors influencing its performance accountability include internal elements such as planning quality, performance measurement, and internal evaluation, as well as external factors like government regulations, external oversight, and societal expectations. The implications suggest areas for improvement and reinforcement of the hospital's performance accountability, contributing to better healthcare service delivery and transparency.