Publication Search

Sustainability accounting plays a very important role for companies, especially in managing the operational impacts on the environment and the surrounding community. Therefore, the implementation of sustainability accounting has a significant impact, particularly in the banking industry sector. This study aims to analyze the effects of implementing sustainability accounting in the banking sector, with Bank Mandiri as a case study. The method used in this research is a qualitative approach, focusing on the paradigm and analyzing the causes and effects of the implementation of sustainability accounting. The results show that the implementation of sustainability accounting affects the operations of Bank Mandiri, especially in efforts to reduce the negative impacts on the environment and society. One of the steps taken by Bank Mandiri is integrating sustainability principles into its operational strategy. Based on these findings, it is recommended that Bank Mandiri continue to strive to improve the company's environmental performance and expand sustainability programs that have a positive impact on society and the environment. In this way, the company can create long-term value not only for internal stakeholders but also for the broader community and the environment.

This study analyzes the influence of Green Accounting, Environmental Performance, and Corporate Governance on the Quality of Sustainability Reports in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Report quality is measured by the completeness and transparency of disclosures based on GRI Standards. A quantitative method is employed, using a purposive sample of manufacturing firms from the 2020- 2023 period. Data is analyzed using multiple regression analysis. Green Accounting is proxied by environmental costs, Environmental Performance by PROPER ratings, Corporate Governance by the proportion of independent commissioners and institutional ownership, while report quality is measured through content analysis. The hypothesized results indicate that all three independent variables are expected to have a significant positive effect on Sustainability Report Quality. The implementation of green accounting, good environmental performance, and strong governance are predicted to enhance the quality of sustainability disclosures. This research contributes to environmental accounting literature and offers practical implications for regulators, investors, and corporate management in the context of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms, proxied by the Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee, as well as Environmental Performance on Financial Performance in food and beverage manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020-2023 period. The research method used is quantitative, with a purposive sampling technique that resulted in 22 companies as samples, totaling 88 observations over the four-year study period. The research data is secondary data obtained through financial statements and annual reports from the official IDX website. Literature reviews indicate inconsistencies in previous studies; however, the hypothesis of this research suggests that the Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, and Environmental Performance have a positive and significant effect on the company's financial performance. The board of commissioners and audit committee play a role in strengthening the oversight function to minimize agency costs and improve efficiency. Meanwhile, good environmental performance, measured through PROPER ratings, is expected to enhance the company's positive image in the eyes of investors and stakeholders. 

This study examines the effectiveness of national legislative strategies in promoting corporate accountability for industrial pollution and social justice violations. It analyzes a comparative legal framework, focusing on laws, enforcement mechanisms, and corporate liability regimes in countries such as France, Germany, Norway, China, and Australia. The research evaluates how mandatory due diligence laws, judicial measures, and transparency mechanisms help hold corporations accountable for environmental impacts. It compares voluntary compliance models with mandatory legal frameworks, noting the limitations of voluntary agreements in driving substantial environmental changes. Findings show that countries with strong legal frameworks, like the EU and Australia, achieve higher corporate compliance and environmental performance, while voluntary measures struggle to produce meaningful results. The study emphasizes the need for stronger enforcement, higher penalties for violations, and enhanced public transparency. Additionally, it explores integrating environmental justice considerations, such as community participation and fair compensation, into national strategies. The study offers policy recommendations for improving corporate responsibility through better legislation, harmonizing laws across jurisdictions, and fostering collaboration among governments, corporations, and civil society. It also suggests future research directions, including examining the long-term impacts of environmental justice policies in different global contexts.

This study aims to examine the effect of green innovation on company value, with financial performance as a mediating variable, in the mining industry. This study uses a systematic literature review approach by examining various relevant previous studies. The results of the study indicate that green innovation plays a significant role in improving environmental performance and operational efficiency of companies, which in turn positively impacts financial performance. Good financial performance is a key factor in strengthening company value and stakeholder trust. These findings confirm that the implementation of green innovation not only supports environmental sustainability but also provides long-term economic benefits for mining companies. This study also found that companies that successfully implement green innovation tend to have a better image in the eyes of investors and the public, which contributes to increasing the company's market value. These findings confirm that the implementation of green innovation not only supports environmental sustainability but also provides long-term economic benefits for mining companies, strengthening their position in an industry that increasingly prioritizes sustainability and social responsibility.

Amidst the current changing global conditions, it is important for a country to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to face challenges in sustainable development, social inequality, and strengthen economic and environmental resilience. This study aims to analyze the influence of environmental performance and political stability on the SDG scores of ASEAN countries for the 2020-2024 period, moderated by economic growth. Researchers used a quantitative method, processed using multiple linear regression with SPSS. The regression process was conducted twice, before and after using moderating variables. The findings suggest that economic growth can alter the influence of environmental performance and political stability on SDG scores. Political stability has a positive impact on the SDGs after economic growth has moderated. While environmental performance has a negative impact after being moderated by economic growth. Economic growth promotes political stability and sustainable growth. Conversely, with high growth, improvements in environmental performance are indicated to shift priorities from sustainability to exploitation.

This study aims to examine and analyze the effects of product quality and distribution channel on repurchase intention, with customer satisfaction and customer trust serving as mediating variables. The research employed a quantitative method with a causal-explanatory approach. The study population consisted of customers at the Weber building materials manufacturing company in East Java, with a sample of 275 respondents selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected via questionnaires and assessed using a Likert scale. The data analysis was conducted using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique with Partial Least Squares (PLS) software. The findings of the study reveal the following: 1) Product quality has a significant positive effect on customer satisfaction; 2) Product quality has a significant positive effect on customer trust; 3) Product quality has a significant positive effect on repurchase intention; 4) Distribution channel has a significant positive effect on customer satisfaction; 5) Distribution channel has a significant positive effect on customer trust; 6) Distribution channel has a significant positive effect on repurchase intention; 7) Customer satisfaction has a significant positive effect on customer trust; 8) Customer satisfaction has a significant positive effect on repurchase intention; 9) Customer trust has a significant positive effect on repurchase intention.

Firm value reflects investors’ perception of a company’s success, which is generally measured through its stock price. To enhance firm value, companies are required to manage their operations with integrity, efficiency, and professionalism, while safeguarding stakeholders’ interests through the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). GCG establishes a framework governing the relationships among shareholders, management, creditors, and the government in relation to their respective rights and responsibilities. In addition to GCG, environmental performance also plays an important role in influencing firm value. Effective corporate management should therefore align with the three dimensions of the Triple Bottom Line framework: profit, people, and planet. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of Good Corporate Governance implementation and environmental performance on firm value. The research was conducted on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2021–2024 period. A total of 41 companies were selected as samples using the purposive sampling method. Data were collected from the official IDX website (www.idx.id) and the respective companies’ official websites. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The results indicate that the independent board of commissioners, board of directors, and environmental performance have a positive and significant effect on firm value. However, the audit committee does not have a significant effect on firm value.

The purpose of this research was to analyze the role of profitability in moderating the relationship green accounting, environmental performance, and total asset turnover on firm value in the 2019-2023 food and beverage subsector. All food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in that period became the research population. The purposive sampling technique resulted in 80 companies. Analyzed were using Descriptive Statistics, Classical Assumption Tests, Hypothesis Testing, and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA).The result show that green accounting has a negative and significant effect on firm value, while environmental performance has a positive and significant effect.Total asset turnover does not significantly affect firm value. Furthermore, profitability is proven to moderate the relationship between green accounting and environmental performance with firm value but does not moderate the effect of total asset turnover. Based on these findings, green accounting plays a role in influencing firm value, although it is not the primary factor determining investors assessments. The implementation of environmental performance is more widely perceived as a form of social responsibility and sustainability that enhances public trust and market value. Meanwhile, efficiency in asset utilization through total asset turnover is not considered a key determinant in increasing firm value.

This research aims to develop a digital-based governance model for village finance to support the realization of a Smart and Green Village. The study analyzes how digital transformation in village finance management can increase transparency, accountability, and efficiency, while promoting sustainability-oriented budgeting and environmental practices. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was used to identify, evaluate, and synthesize scientific publications from 2022 to 2025, accessed through reputable databases such as ScienceDirect, Springer, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, SAGE, ACM, and IEEE. The review focused on topics including digital governance in villages, digital public finance, smart village development, green budgeting, environmental sustainability, and rural digital transformation. Findings indicate that digital-based village finance governance enhances administrative efficiency, strengthens budget transparency through real-time monitoring, minimizes financial deviation risks, and boosts public participation in fiscal accountability. Integrating digital systems with green budgeting features enables the prioritization of sustainable programs, such as renewable energy, waste management, climate change mitigation, and green infrastructure development. The study suggests a comprehensive digital-based governance model that includes e-budgeting, e-accounting, digital payment systems, public transparency dashboards, and environmental performance indicators to support the implementation of a Smart and Green Village. This research offers strategic insights for village governments, policymakers, and practitioners on the importance of adopting digital governance tools to improve financial management and strengthen sustainable development at the local level.

Sustainability reporting has been increasingly popular in recent years as businesses become more aware of environmental challenges. 96% of the top businesses in the world have implemented sustainability reporting practices, according to a KPMG survey. The effect of sustainability reporting practices on environmental performance is examined in this study. Sustainability reports, the implementation of GRI standards, and external assurance are used to gauge sustainability reporting procedures; firm size is used as a control variable. In this study, 305 observational data from manufacturing firm over a five-year period (2018-2022) were analysed quantitatively using binary logistic regression. The findings indicate that while the use of GRI standards has a positive and significant effect on environmental performance, sustainability reports and external assurance have no significant effect. These findings show that the implementation in GRI standards encourages business commitment to sustainable practices and transparency, both of which have a significant impact on environmental performance. In the meanwhile, external assurance and sustainability reports tend to be mostly symbolic and do not demonstrate a real commitment to environmental improvement. Environmental performance is positively impacted by the control variable, firm size. These findings suggest that a company's environmental performance is correlated with its size. As a control variable, firm size contributes to maintaining and clarifying the relationship between environmental performance and sustainability practices while ensuring objective and valid study findings. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening the quality of sustainability reporting and expanding the application of external standards and assurance to improve the credibility and accountability of corporate environmental performance in Indonesia.

This study aims to determine the effect of sustainability performance on profitability in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This research is a type of quantitative research. The data used are primary data obtained from 6 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2020-2023 with a total of 24 observation data during 4 years of observation. The data collection technique used is documentation. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis with SPSSV.27 software. The results of the study show that economic performance (X1) has a positive and significant effect on profitability in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) This is evidenced by the t-calculated value of 4.055 > t table 1.725 and a significance value of 0.001 < 0.05. Meanwhile, social performance (X2) has been proven to have a negative and significant effect on profitability in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This is evidenced by the t-calculated value of -4.495 > t table 1.725 and a significance value of 0.001 < 0.05 and the environmental performance variable (X3) also has a positive and significant influence on profitability in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This is evidenced by the t-calculated value of 3.074 > t-table 1.725 and a significant value of 0.006 < 0.05. Partially, these three variables have a significant influence on profitability in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a value of (R2) of 0.682.

Climate change driven by global warming has prompted companies to enhance transparency regarding the environmental impacts of their operational activities, particularly in the disclosure of carbon emissions. Such disclosure is essential to address stakeholder demands and to gain social legitimacy, in accordance with stakeholder theory, which serves as the foundation of this study. This research aims to empirically examine the effect of environmental performance, profitability, and institutional ownership on carbon emission disclosure among non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population of this study comprises non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2023. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique, resulting in 332 observations from 115 companies. The data analysis method employed is multiple linear regression analysis. The results reveal that environmental performance has a positive effect on carbon emission disclosure, indicating that the better the company’s environmental performance, the higher the level of carbon emission disclosure. Profitability and institutional ownership, however, have no significant effect on carbon emission disclosure.

The concept of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) encourages companies to enhance transparency in disclosing their economic, social, and environmental performance through sustainability reporting, which is expected to increase accountability and serve as a positive signal to investors. In Indonesia, particularly in the manufacturing sector that contributes significantly to the economy while also generating environmental impacts, sustainability reporting practices have been expanding, although their effectiveness in building investor trust remains contested. This study aims to analyze the influence of sustainability reporting and profitability on investor trust in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), employing a quantitative method based on secondary data from annual and sustainability reports for the period 2020–2023. The sample was determined using purposive sampling, while the analysis was conducted through multiple linear regression with Price to Book Value (PBV) as a proxy for investor trust. The results indicate that, simultaneously, economic performance, environmental performance, social performance, and profitability significantly affect investor trust. However, partially, economic, environmental, and social performance show no significant effect on investor trust. In contrast, profitability exerts a positive and significant influence, making it the primary factor shaping investor trust. These findings suggest that investors in Indonesia still prioritize financial information over sustainability disclosures in making investment decisions.

This study aims to analyze the influence of capital structure, liquidity, sales growth, and green accounting, assessed through environmental performance and environmental costs, on the profitability of companies. The research focuses on the food and beverage sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2020–2024 period, which represents one of the most dynamic and environmentally impactful industries in Indonesia. The sample consists of 30 companies selected using a purposive sampling technique based on predetermined criteria, ensuring the representativeness and relevance of the data analyzed. The study employs multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 22.0 to test the hypotheses and measure the extent to which the independent variables contribute to profitability as the dependent variable. The findings reveal that liquidity and sales growth exert a positive and significant influence on profitability, indicating that firms with higher liquidity levels and stronger sales growth are better positioned to enhance their financial performance. In contrast, capital structure demonstrates a negative and significant effect, suggesting that higher levels of debt reduce profitability due to increased financial burdens. Similarly, green accounting, when assessed through environmental performance, also shows a negative and significant impact, implying that companies focusing on environmental initiatives may face higher costs that suppress short-term profitability. However, green accounting as measured by environmental costs does not show any significant effect on profitability, highlighting that disclosure or allocation of environmental costs alone may not directly translate into financial outcomes. Overall, the study concludes that capital structure, liquidity, sales growth, and green accounting—when measured through both environmental performance and costs—jointly influence the profitability of food and beverage companies on the IDX during the observed period.

This study aims to examine the relationship between a company's value (firm value) and three key variables: environmental performance, capital structure, and management ownership. The research focuses on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period from 2022 to 2024. The objective is to understand how these internal and external factors contribute to shaping a company’s market valuation and overall financial health. Using a panel data regression analysis with a fixed effect model, the study provides empirical evidence based on secondary data drawn from company financial reports and sustainability disclosures. The results indicate that capital structure, measured by the proportion of debt to equity, has a significant negative impact on firm value. In contrast, both environmental performance and the proportion of shares owned by management have a positive and significant effect on firm value. These findings suggest that while excessive debt may erode investor confidence and reduce a firm's valuation, strong environmental commitments and management ownership foster positive perceptions in the eyes of stakeholders, including investors and customers. Theoretically, this research supports stakeholder and agency theories by highlighting how internal governance and ethical responsibility play a role in corporate success. Pragmatically, the results offer important insights for companies, especially in emerging markets like Indonesia, to align sustainability and ownership strategies with financial management to boost firm value. Companies are encouraged to optimize their capital structures, strengthen their environmental reporting practices, and promote management ownership as a way to align interests and enhance long-term performance. Overall, this study contributes to the literature on corporate governance and sustainability by providing current, context-specific evidence relevant to stakeholders in the Indonesian capital market.

The proposed research will focus on defining the effects of the strategic audit aspects instrengthening the institutional performance of the Iraqi General Cement Company. The research targetedfour important dimensions that are strategic position of the institution, the internal environment, theexternal environment, and the stakeholder, and how these dimensions would be associated with variousdimensions of performance such as learning and growth, internal operations and customer satisfaction,financial performance, and environmental performance. The research methodology employed adescriptive and analytical approach, utilizing statistical methods such as SPSS V.25 and AMOS V.23 totest the study's hypotheses. The findings indicated that both the external environment and the involvementof the stakeholders had the most significant positive impacts on both the financial and the environmentalperformance of the company, whereas the internal environment was found to have solid effects oninternal activities and on customer satisfaction. The average effect on learning and development was alsorecorded on the strategic position. The findings of the study indicated that as a way of sustaininginstitutional performance, a combined consideration of strategic alignment, overall institutional processadvancement and the partnership with stakeholders should be implemented.

Stock price fluctuations, particularly in the energy sector, reflect market uncertainty regarding corporate performance and sustainability commitments. A high stock price indicates strong firm value. This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the influence of environmental performance and carbon emission disclosure on firm value, with profitability as a mediating variable. The study was conducted on energy sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2021–2023. The sample was selected using purposive sampling, resulting in 165 observations. Path analysis and Sobel test were employed. The results indicate that both financial and non-financial disclosures by companies can serve as either positive or negative signals influencing investor perceptions in decision-making. This supports signaling theory, which emphasizes the importance of information transparency to reduce information asymmetry and build market trust. Thus, companies, especially in the energy sector, must improve the quality and reliability of their disclosures by preparing transparent, accurate, and standard-compliant reports to strengthen their public image and increase firm value.

Profitability is a critical factor in ensuring a company’s sustainability. In the current business environment, companies are required to balance profit with non-financial aspects, namely social and environmental considerations. This study aims to empirically examine the effect of green accounting, environmental performance, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on profitability, using firm size as a control variable. The research was conducted on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2021–2024 period. The sample was selected using purposive sampling, resulting in 246 observations. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression techniques. The findings indicate that green accounting and firm size (as a control variable) have a significant negative effect on profitability. In contrast, environmental performance and CSR disclosure have a significant positive effect on profitability. These results imply that corporate management should strive to balance profit, social, and environmental aspects without neglecting cost efficiency. Furthermore, environmental performance and CSR disclosure can serve as key indicators in investment decision-making, as they provide favorable returns for shareholders.

This study investigates the effect of environmental costs on the level of environmental information transparency in manufacturing companies in the basic materials subsector, while providing empirical evidence regarding the relationship. Environmental costs are calculated through the ratio of corporate social responsibility (CSR) burden to the organization's net profit. Meanwhile, the company's environmental performance is evaluated using the PROPER rating on an ordinal scale. The level of environmental coverage is measured comprehensively through the Clarkson index which covers various dimensions of existing reporting. A quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis is applied to test the relationship between variables. In selecting the sample, a purposive sampling technique was used by considering the completeness of the data and certain sector criteria, resulting in 35 companies as the final sample that met the analysis requirements. The results of the study revealed that an increase in environmental costs is directly proportional to a significant increase in environmental coverage. This indicates that company investment in environmental programs encourages more transparent reporting practices. In addition, environmental performance as reflected in the PROPER rating is also proven to have a positive and significant effect on the extent of environmental coverage.