Publication Search

This research was motivated by learning activities forced by circumstances (during the Covid-19 pandemic) to change from face-to-face to virtual face-to-face. This raises a separate problem to immediately find an alternative solution. The purpose of this study was to obtain data about the description of the implementation of persuasive communication activities in order to improve student learning outcomes through E-Learning Madrasah’s in fiqh class XII IPS 3 Odd Semester at MAN 1 Grobogan. The research method used was Classroom Action Research (PTK). The research was carried out in two cycles, each cycle consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The subject of this research was carried out in class XII IPS 3 MAN 1 Grobogan, totaling 35 students. The data collection used in this research is qualitative and quantitative data. The results of this study indicate that the use of persuasive communication through Madrasah E-Learning conducted to students of class XII IPS 3 MAN 1 Grobogan, can improve student learning outcomes. This can be shown by the average test results of student learning in the first cycle of 77 with the total class completeness of 71.4%. Then the average value of student learning outcomes increased to 88 with the total class completeness of 91.4% in cycle II

Additional criminal threats added on top of the main criminal sanctions aim to prevent military members from committing violations. The aim of this research shows that to maintain discipline, the application of additional punishment must remain based on the principles of law and justice. Qualitative research uses a descriptive approach to collect data systematically, factually, and quickly according to the description at the time of the research. The results of this research show that this additional penalty is expected to provide a stronger incentive for military members to comply with established ethics and regulations, maintain military integrity and efficiency, and improve the public's image and trust in military institutions.

Backgroud: Nausea and vomiting (emesis gravidarum) are symptoms that often occur in 60-80% Primigravida and 40-60% Multigravida. The causes of nausea and vomiting vary, among others, due to hormonal changes in the body, psychological, to lifestyle. The purpose of this study was to determine the description of knowledge of trimester 1 pregnant women about emesis gravidarum. Methods: This research design uses descriptive research type. The sample of this study was the first semester pregnant women who came to have their pregnancy examined at the Rasoki Labuhan Public Health Center in August 2018, amounting to 30 people. The sampling technique uses accidental sampling. The research instrument was in the form of questionnaire sheets and mother's MCH handbook. Results: Data processing techniques starts from editing, coding, tabulation and finally data analysis. From the total of 30 respondents, 7 (23.3%) data have good knowledge, 16 (53.4%) respondents have sufficient knowledge and 7 (23.3%) respondents who have less knowledge about emesis gravidarum. It is expected that first trimester pregnant women will seek more complete information on emesis gravidarum.

Military justice carried out by the Military Prosecutor is an indirect authority because the delegation of the case is an implementation of the Handover of the Case from Papera, in other words the Military Prosecutor cannot delegate the case or take prosecution action to the competent court without the existence of a Decree from Papera because it is in accordance with Article 123 paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 31 of 1997, in essence, the authority to hand over cases is the authority of Papera, not the authority of the Military Prosecutor. The aim of this research is to analyze the responsibilities of Military Prosecutors in carrying out prosecutions. Technically, juridically, they are responsible to the TNI Prosecutor General (Orjen TNI), while operationally they are responsible to the Case Submitting Officer (Papera). Qualitative research uses a descriptive approach to collect data systematically, factually, and quickly according to the description at the time of the research. The results of this research show that Military Prosecutors as law enforcers in the field of prosecution in the Military Justice environment have a strategic and decisive role in indicting someone before trial. For this reason, the professionalism of Military Prosecutors is a necessity in carrying out their duties so that prosecutions can be carried out in accordance with applicable regulations and the goal of law enforcement itself can be achieved optimally as expected.

Handing over a case to a military court is the authority of the Case Handing Officer (Papera) not the authority of the Military Prosecutor as a general summons, which is a specialty of military justice that handing over a case to a military court is an order from the Case Handing Officer (Papera) to the Military Prosecutor all summoning the public to do so. Linking the case at the conference. The purpose of this research is to analyze the existence of the authority of the Case Handing Officer (Papera) which is only directed at criminal acts committed by TNI soldiers who are under the authority of their command which is an order to the Military Prosecutor. The entire military summons the public to summon the matter at the conference. Qualitative research uses a descriptive approach to collect data systematically, factually, and quickly according to the description at the time of the research. The results of this research indicate that the submission of criminal charges (requisitoir) made by the Military Prosecutor for all general summonses must be based on a conference because the conference facts are legal facts produced through the conference examination process by analyzing all the evidence submitted.