Publication Search

Critical Control Point (CCP) a point, stage, or procedures where the danger that related with food can be prevented, eliminated or reduced to the point that can be accepted (allowed or secure point). The purpose of this research is to know the level of the determination of Critical Control Point (CCP) on the process of fish canning sardinella,SP and know the critical control point on the process of fish canning sardinella,SP. This study uses qualitative data obtained from interviews, surveys, observations and documentation using data reduction analysis, data presentation, verification and decisionmaking trees. The results of this study show that the Application of Critical Control Point (CCP) in the Lemuru Fish Canning Process (Sardinella Lemuru) at PT Sarana Tani Pratama has been effective even though there are several elements that need more attention so that its application can be in accordance with the guidelines for good food production methods. Critical control points (CCP) in the process of canning lemuru fish (Sardinella, sp), are as follows: 1) Acceptance of raw materials (frozen & fresh), 2) Closure of cans (seammer), 3) Sterelization / Retort.

This article explores the judicial considerations and decisionmaking process regarding a petition for gender reassignment at the Batam District Court, exemplified by Case Number 176/Pdt. P/2024/PN Btm. The analysis encompasses legal aspects, presented evidence, principles of justice, and the societal impacts of the court's decision. The study utilizes a descriptiveanalytical approach to examine the legal framework, notably the Law No. 24 of 2013 on Population Administration, and evaluates medical and psychological evidence supporting the petitioner's gender identity. Additionally, comparative analysis of previous cases aids in understanding the application of Indonesian law concerning gender reassignment. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of a fair and legally sound decision that respects societal norms and ensures equitable outcomes for all stakeholders

Behavioral economics has highlighted how cognitive biases influence financial decisionmaking, often leading to suboptimal outcomes. This paper explores the impact of behavioral biases such as overconfidence, loss aversion, and herding behavior on accounting and economic forecasting. By reviewing empirical evidence from market behavior, the study assesses how these biases affect financial reporting, auditing practices, and economic predictions. The paper concludes with recommendations for accountants and economists to incorporate behavioral insights into their practices to improve decisionmaking and forecasting accuracy.