Publication Search

Formation, Regional Regulation of Tangerang City, Supervision of Cancellation Revocation, Process of Formation of Regional Regulation of Tangerang City Number 7 of 2005, Is it in accordance with Law Number 10 of 2004, concerning Formation of Regulations Per Act and their Implementation, such as Planning, Preparation, Engineering Preparation, Formulation, Discussion, Ratification, Promulgation and Dissemination, but there are Chapters and several Articles, in particular Chapter III concerning Sales and Use Circulation, which are Prohibition or Violation, Article 3 Paragraph (1), Article 4 Letter a, b and c , Article 5 Paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 6 and Article 7 and Chapter VIII, concerning Criminal Provisions, Article 13 Paragraphs (1), (2), (3) and (4) the nature of the sanctions in the form of criminal threats and fines for violators of regional regulations, it turns out to be very contradictory to the Criminal Code Chapter I, concerning Violations of Public Security for People or Goods and Health, Article 492 Paragraphs (1) and (2), in terms of criminal threats and fines for violators of the Criminal Code. in fact it is not as firm as Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2005. What is the Mechanism of Supervision, Revocation and Cancellation, Formation of Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2005, based on Law Number 32 of 2004, concerning Regional Government and Law No. 22 of 2003, concerning the Position Structure MPR, DPR, DPD ·and DPRD Province, Regency and City. This research is a normative legal research which is descriptive and the data is analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research is that the process of formation, supervision, revocation and cancellation is in accordance with Law No. 10 of 2004, Law No. 32 of 2004 and Law No. 22 of 2003.

The purpose of the study is to determine and analyze the criminal law protection of embezzlement of assets (Boedel Bankruptcy) of debtors that result in losses to creditors, and obstacles to criminal law enforcement for embezzlement of debtors' assets that result in the formulation of the problem What is the position of criminal law Embezzlement of debtors on their assets that causes creditor losses and how to overcome them. The method used in this study uses the Normative juridical approach method, the data sources are secondary data and primary legal materials.  Research Results (1).  Legal protection of the criminal act of embezzlement of the debtor that causes losses to the debtor, after being declared bankrupt by a judge is a criminal act of embezzlement regulated by Article 372 of the Criminal Code and Article 400 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, because the fulfillment of the criminal elements is fulfilled. (2). Obstacles faced, Uncooperation of the insolvent debtor in carrying out legal proceedings due to the lack of level of legal awareness possessed by the insolvent debtor. To overcome this, the bankrupt debtor should comply with the contents of the decision of the Supreme Court case Number 2K / Pdt.Sus-Pailit / 2019 willing to submit the legality of access to the curator team that will resolve, and as a good Indonesian citizen must obey, submit, and obey the laws and laws in force in Indonesia.