Publication Search

Theft is a crime that is intended for property and goods and often occurs in society. This crime is an action that can shake the security stability of both the assets and the lives of citizens. Therefore, the Criminal Code (KUHP) emphasizes detailed and severe punishment for violators. This can be seen from the form of punishment and the threat of punishment imposed(Arief Rahman Kurniadi 2022: h.77). Theft is also a criminal act, if it is committed by an adult, he will undergo a legal process, but in general, if he is caught, he must go through the legal process that has been in effect. But it is different if the crime of theft is committed by children, and of course the legal process that is enforced is also different(Usep Tatang Suryadi and Yana Supriatna 2019: h.15).

Formation, Regional Regulation of Tangerang City, Supervision of Cancellation Revocation, Process of Formation of Regional Regulation of Tangerang City Number 7 of 2005, Is it in accordance with Law Number 10 of 2004, concerning Formation of Regulations Per Act and their Implementation, such as Planning, Preparation, Engineering Preparation, Formulation, Discussion, Ratification, Promulgation and Dissemination, but there are Chapters and several Articles, in particular Chapter III concerning Sales and Use Circulation, which are Prohibition or Violation, Article 3 Paragraph (1), Article 4 Letter a, b and c , Article 5 Paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 6 and Article 7 and Chapter VIII, concerning Criminal Provisions, Article 13 Paragraphs (1), (2), (3) and (4) the nature of the sanctions in the form of criminal threats and fines for violators of regional regulations, it turns out to be very contradictory to the Criminal Code Chapter I, concerning Violations of Public Security for People or Goods and Health, Article 492 Paragraphs (1) and (2), in terms of criminal threats and fines for violators of the Criminal Code. in fact it is not as firm as Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2005. What is the Mechanism of Supervision, Revocation and Cancellation, Formation of Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2005, based on Law Number 32 of 2004, concerning Regional Government and Law No. 22 of 2003, concerning the Position Structure MPR, DPR, DPD ·and DPRD Province, Regency and City. This research is a normative legal research which is descriptive and the data is analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research is that the process of formation, supervision, revocation and cancellation is in accordance with Law No. 10 of 2004, Law No. 32 of 2004 and Law No. 22 of 2003.

The purpose of the study is to determine and analyze the criminal law protection of embezzlement of assets (Boedel Bankruptcy) of debtors that result in losses to creditors, and obstacles to criminal law enforcement for embezzlement of debtors' assets that result in the formulation of the problem What is the position of criminal law Embezzlement of debtors on their assets that causes creditor losses and how to overcome them. The method used in this study uses the Normative juridical approach method, the data sources are secondary data and primary legal materials.  Research Results (1).  Legal protection of the criminal act of embezzlement of the debtor that causes losses to the debtor, after being declared bankrupt by a judge is a criminal act of embezzlement regulated by Article 372 of the Criminal Code and Article 400 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, because the fulfillment of the criminal elements is fulfilled. (2). Obstacles faced, Uncooperation of the insolvent debtor in carrying out legal proceedings due to the lack of level of legal awareness possessed by the insolvent debtor. To overcome this, the bankrupt debtor should comply with the contents of the decision of the Supreme Court case Number 2K / Pdt.Sus-Pailit / 2019 willing to submit the legality of access to the curator team that will resolve, and as a good Indonesian citizen must obey, submit, and obey the laws and laws in force in Indonesia.

The problems that will be studied are: 1) How is the criminalization system in the law on the elimination of domestic violence, 2) What are the obstacles faced in punishing perpetrators of domestic violence. This research will be compiled using a normative legal research type, namely a process to find a legal rule, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced. The results of the study concluded that: (1). The regulation of the criminalization system in the Criminal Code with Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence is the same, namely recognizing the imposition of imprisonment and fines, only the length of the prison sentence and the amount of the fine are not the same. Related to the legal subject and the regulatory system both in the Criminal Code and in Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence are the same, namely using the legal subject of people and a single track system. (2). The obstacles faced in punishing perpetrators of domestic violence are: The legal factor itself, the factor of law enforcement officers, the factor of facilities and facilities.

The problems that will be studied are: 1) How is the criminalization system in the law on the elimination of domestic violence, 2) What are the obstacles faced in punishing perpetrators of domestic violence. This research will be compiled using a normative legal research type, namely a process to find a legal rule, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced. The results of the study concluded that: (1). The regulation of the criminalization system in the Criminal Code with Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence is the same, namely recognizing the imposition of imprisonment and fines, only the length of the prison sentence and the amount of the fine are not the same. Related to the legal subject and the regulatory system both in the Criminal Code and in Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence are the same, namely using the legal subject of people and a single track system. (2). The obstacles faced in punishing perpetrators of domestic violence are: The legal factor itself, the factor of law enforcement officers, the factor of facilities and facilities.

Malpractice cases are a crime that is very common in Indonesia. Malpractice is basically an act of a professional that is contrary to standard operating procedures (SOP), code of ethics, and applicable laws, whether intentional or as a result of negligence that results in loss or death to others. Aspects of legal protection for patients who are victims of malpractice by doctors based on Indonesian law, namely : preventively with the existence of regulations governing malpractice, namely in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), the Health Law, the Consumer Protection Law, the Medical Practice Law, and the Legal Code, Penal (Penal Code) and repressively the lack of action resulted in a loss, the person who performed the action imposed sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, namely to compensate both the administrator sanctions and criminal sanctions.

Malpractice cases are a crime that is very common in Indonesia. Malpractice is basically an act of a professional that is contrary to standard operating procedures (SOP), code of ethics, and applicable laws, whether intentional or as a result of negligence that results in loss or death to others. Aspects of legal protection for patients who are victims of malpractice by doctors based on Indonesian law, namely : preventively with the existence of regulations governing malpractice, namely in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), the Health Law, the Consumer Protection Law, the Medical Practice Law, and the Legal Code, Penal (Penal Code) and repressively the lack of action resulted in a loss, the person who performed the action imposed sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, namely to compensate both the administrator sanctions and criminal sanctions.

The Order for Termination of Investigation or hereinafter referred to as SP3 is the authority given attributively to criminal investigators. This paper intends to provide an analysis in terms of normative law regarding the validity of the termination of an investigation carried out based on reconciliation between the suspect and the complainant in the case of ordinary offenses. Research is a main means in developing a science and technology with the aim of revealing the existence of a truth both systematically, methodologically, and consistently through the research process as well as conducting analysis and construction of the data that has been processed and then concluded. Article 109 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) states that there are three conditions to stop an investigation of a criminal act. First, there is not enough evidence. Second, the act committed by the suspect is not a crime. Third, the investigation was stopped for the sake of law. The fact that the revocation of the police report resulted in the case being discontinued or terminated, as evidenced by the issuance of an Investigation Termination Order or SP3.