Publication Search

A clear national insight can guarantee the achievement of national interests, both internally and externally. This means that national insight provides a clear picture and direction for the nation's survival, as well as the future development of the nation and state. The organization of national and state life must proceed on the basis of mutual agreement, namely Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). Indonesia's existence as a state based on the rule of law (rechtstaat) based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution requires the development of Pancasila ideology and national insight as instruments that serve as catalysts or drivers in strengthening national insight and spirit, love of the homeland, democracy, legal awareness, respect for diversity, and participation in building a Pancasila-based nation in Wonogiri, especially among intellectuals. In accordance with its function, the Pancasila Ideology and National Insight Development organizes national, democratic, legal, multicultural and citizenship education to support the realization of citizens who are aware of their rights and obligations, as well as intelligent, skilled and have character so that they can be relied upon to build the nation and the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia.

Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right, yet it is not absolute, as it may be restricted under certain conditions in accordance with international law, such as the protection of reputation, national security, and public order. In Indonesia, this right is guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and its derivative regulations. However, the rapid development of information and communication technology has reshaped the landscape of public discourse. The digital space, while facilitating easier access to and dissemination of information, also presents challenges, including hate speech, misinformation, cyberbullying, and the potential for criminalization due to ambiguous regulations.To respond to these challenges, the Regional Board of Nasyiatul Aisyiyah (PDNA) Semarang organized a community service program in the form of a public dialogue titled “Freedom of Speech: Between Rights and Risks” on August 9, 2025, at the Hall of the Central Java Provincial Archives and Library Service. This activity was carried out through a participatory approach by academics who are also members of PDNA, together with the PDNA Semarang board. Two speakers were presented, Dr. Mochamad Riyanto, S.H., M.Si., a legal expert from Universitas 17 Agustus (Untag) Semarang, and Aris Mulyawan, Chair of the Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) Semarang. The dialogue produced three main findings: first, the need for legal awareness so that freedom of expression does not lead individuals into legal problems; second, the importance of digital literacy to reduce the spread of hoaxes and hate speech; and third, the urgency of building safe digital spaces through collaboration among communities, media, and educational institutions. The discussion emphasizes that freedom of expression in the digital era must be understood as both a right and a responsibility, requiring a fair regulatory ecosystem and continuous digital literacy enhancement

This essay looks at an investigation into the economies, A significant topic in the policy equation of many has been fiscal federalism, which reflects the degree of fiscal autonomy and responsibility granted to subnational government developing, transitional, and industrialized nations. Scholarly attention has been drawn to Nigeria's federalism because of its intricacy and vibrancy. This is due to the fact that it has created numerous issues that could jeopardize the Nigerian state's corporate existence and continuity. Therefore, the relationship between Nigeria's fiscal federalism and the oil-rich nation's lack of economic development is highlighted in this study. Our main contention is that Nigeria's fiscal federalism has not sparked the growth that the system's designers had hoped for. Therefore, this essay looked at Nigeria's fiscal federalism's development, composition, and practices. In order to do this, the study used secondary sources to collect data and combined descriptive and analytical methodologies. According to the report, Nigeria has not functioned as a a federal constitution, making it a true federation. Taxing authority and fiscal responsibility are still heavily concentrated. Numerous issues, such as the federal government's dominance in income sharing, the lengthy period of military interregnum rule, and an excessive reliance on Federation Account revenue, have hindered Nigeria's practice of fiscal federalism. This study investigated how fiscal federalism and the chosen distribution formula contribute to unhappiness and violent agitation. In order to do this, the study used secondary sources to collect data and combined descriptive and analytical methodologies. Therefore, the study came to the conclusion that in order to promote sound fiscal independence, the federal government should give state governments some of its taxing authority. and rivalry between states.