Publication Search

Solid financial performance is a crucial foundation for companies to achieve long-term success. In the banking context, financial health assessments are essential, as they directly relate to the stability of the national financial system. Therefore, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) has established standards for evaluating bank soundness using the RGEC method, which includes four key aspects: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This study aims to analyze the soundness level of PT Bank Central Asia Tbk (BCA) during the 2020–2024 period using the RGEC approach. The assessment is conducted by evaluating financial ratios such as Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return on Assets (ROA), Net Interest Margin (NIM), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The analysis results show that BCA achieved a "very healthy" rating (PK-1) in all RGEC aspects. This reflects BCA's ability to effectively manage risk, implement sound corporate governance principles, and maintain strong profitability and capital. These findings strengthen BCA's position as one of the best-performing banks in Indonesia and demonstrate the company's commitment to maintaining financial stability and customer trust.

This research is aimed at analyzing the level of bank health at PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda which was carried out using RGEC method. The data used comes from the financial reports of PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda for the 2018-2022 period or five years and 40 company data was found. The RGEC method was employed during the data analysis. Based on the conducted analysis, it was discovered that PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda had a fairly excellent rating from 2018 to 2022 (Composite rating 3).    

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of assessing banking soundness levels using the PT RGEC method. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk in 2018-2020. In this research, researchers used several research variables which include Risk Profile (NPL and LDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings (ROA, ROE, NIM, BOPO) and Capital (CAR). Based on research on the effectiveness of assessing the level of banking health at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk, using the RGEC method, shows that the bank's health status is in accordance with the standards set by Bank Indonesia regulations. For the 2018 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 90%, for the 2019 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 92.5%, for the 2020 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 90%. As well as the bank's health level in terms of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, earnings and Capital indicators at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk for 2018-2020 is "Very Healthy". It is hoped that future researchers will be more careful in carrying out calculations, can use better methods than this research and can add ratios so that the results of the research are more robust.

The assessment rating of bank hlth is expected to evalute the prformance of the banking industry. Because bank healtiness represent good financial condition and good management. Risk-based Bank Rating (RBBR) method is used Bank Indonesia as a standard to appraise the rating of the bank health. This study to find out the sundeness level of bank in terms of the aspects of Risk profille, Good Corporate Govermance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This was an deskriptif analysis, with the object study is BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. the data were collected through documentation and date analysis techniquen was an analysis of the soundness of bank using the Risk-Bases Bank Rating approach with an assesment converage including Non Ferforming loand, Loan to Deposit Rating, Good Corporate Governmence, Return on Assets, Operational costs on operating income, and Capital Adequacy Ratio factors. The resulth howed the condition of BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. at “healthy criteria” with Non performing Loand of 1,8%, Loan to Deposit Rating of 85%, Maximum credit limit of 0,083%, Return on Assets of 0,034%, Operational costs on operating income of 0,070%, and Capital Adequacy Ratio of 41%..

This research aims to analysis the soundness level of banks using the RGEC method at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk in 2018-2021. The data studied is in the form of financial statements of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk for 2018-2021. The data collection technique used is the documentation technique. The data analysis technique used is a qualitative descriptive analysis technique using the RGEC method. The results of this research show that Bank Mandiri for 2018-2021 is viewed from the aspect of risk profile with two ratios, namely the ratio of Non-Performing Loans for banks in a healthy condition and the ratio of Loan to Deposit Ratio for banks in a fairly healthy condition. Aspects of Good Corporate Governance get the title of very healthy. Earnings aspect with two ratios, namely the ratio of the bank's Return on Assets in a very healthy condition and the ratio of the bank's Net Interest Margin in a healthy condition. Aspects of Capital with the ratio of Capital Adequacy Ratio of the bank is in very healthy condition.      

This study aims to determine the comparison of the soundness level of PT.  Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk based on Bank Indonesia Regulation (PBI) No.13/1/PBI/2011 concerning Assessment of Commercial Bank Validity Level using RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Eaming and Capital). The period used in his research was 5 years, starting from 2018 to 2022. The type of research used is descriptive research kualitative. The data obtained is in the form of secondary data in the form of annual financial statements of PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.  This study used an assessment method based on the calculation of each variable. Risk Profile assessment uses Non Performing Loan (NPL) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) ratios. Good Corporate Governance uses the results of Self Assessment of GCG implementation that has been published by PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Earnings valuation uses the ratio of Return On Asset (ROA) and Operating Expense Against Operating Income (BOPO).. Capital uses the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of research and data analysis using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital) methods can be concluded that PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk received a Composite Rating of 1 (PK-1) with the predicate "Very Healthy". This is evidenced by PT Bank Central Asia Tbk obtaining an average composite value of 97.33% and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk of 94.00% for the past 5 years. So it is proven that PT Bank Central Asia has a higher performance than PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

This study aims to determine and analyze how the health comparison of PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk and PT Bank Bumi Arta Tbk based on earnings and capital for the 2016-2020 period. The collection technique in this research is using the documentation on financial statements and literature studies of the theories used. Sampling in the form of financial statements, income statements and balance sheets obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) which is accessed on the website www.idx.The data analysis technique used is quantitative descriptive analysis. Banking soundness level based on Earnings and capital consisting of ROA, ROE, NIM BOPO, and CAR. From the results of this study indicate that the health level of PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk is better than PT Bank Bumi Arta Tbk. This is due to differences in the level of supervision of the bank's health performance which give rise to different health management for each bank.