Publication Search

This study aims to analyze and evaluate the health level of PT Bank Mega Tbk during the 2016–2023 period using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RGEC) method. This research employs a quantitative descriptive approach with an evaluative design. The data used are secondary data obtained from audited annual financial statements published by PT Bank Mega Tbk and the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The analytical method refers to regulatory provisions by Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority, covering four assessment factors: Risk Profile (measured by Non-Performing Loan and Loan to Deposit Ratio), Good Corporate Governance (based on self-assessment reports), Earnings (measured by Return on Assets, Return on Equity, BOPO, and Net Interest Margin), and Capital (measured by Capital Adequacy Ratio). Each indicator is assessed according to regulatory criteria and integrated to determine the Composite Rating (PK). The results show that PT Bank Mega Tbk consistently achieved Composite Rating 1 (PK-1), categorized as “Very Healthy,” throughout the observation period. The Risk Profile, Capital, and most Earnings indicators demonstrate strong and stable performance, while Good Corporate Governance remains consistently in the “Healthy” category. However, the Return on Equity indicator shows relatively lower performance compared to other profitability ratios, indicating the need for more optimal utilization of equity. Overall, the findings confirm the bank’s strong financial resilience while highlighting managerial implications related to capital efficiency.

Solid financial performance is a crucial foundation for companies to achieve long-term success. In the banking context, financial health assessments are essential, as they directly relate to the stability of the national financial system. Therefore, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) has established standards for evaluating bank soundness using the RGEC method, which includes four key aspects: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This study aims to analyze the soundness level of PT Bank Central Asia Tbk (BCA) during the 2020–2024 period using the RGEC approach. The assessment is conducted by evaluating financial ratios such as Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return on Assets (ROA), Net Interest Margin (NIM), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The analysis results show that BCA achieved a "very healthy" rating (PK-1) in all RGEC aspects. This reflects BCA's ability to effectively manage risk, implement sound corporate governance principles, and maintain strong profitability and capital. These findings strengthen BCA's position as one of the best-performing banks in Indonesia and demonstrate the company's commitment to maintaining financial stability and customer trust.

This study aims to evaluate the soundness of PT Bank Panin Tbk during the 2014–2024 period using the RGEC method, which assesses four key dimensions: risk, governance, earnings, and capital. This research approach is quantitative and descriptive, utilizing secondary data sourced from annual reports, financial statements, and officially published corporate governance documents. Each component is analyzed using relevant indicators, such as the NPL ratio, LDR, PDN, ROA, ROE, BOPO, NIM, and CAR. The results indicate that PT Bank Panin Tbk's risk profile, as reflected in the NPL, PDN, and LDR ratios, is largely in the healthy category, demonstrating the bank's ability to effectively manage credit and liquidity risks. An evaluation of corporate governance, based on consistent self-assessment reports over ten years, also demonstrates the achievement of a healthy rating, reflecting the bank's commitment to maintaining the principles of transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Regarding earnings, profit performance, as measured by ROA, ROE, BOPO, and NIM, shows stable and positive results, confirming the bank's ability to generate sustainable profits. Meanwhile, in terms of capital, the CAR ratio recorded excellent performance and was a dominant factor in maintaining capital resilience while meeting the capital adequacy standards set by regulators. These findings confirm that PT Bank Panin Tbk was in overall good health throughout the study period. The results of this study are expected to provide strategic input for bank management in maintaining positive performance and for regulators as material for evaluating banking policies.  

This research is aimed at analyzing the level of bank health at PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda which was carried out using RGEC method. The data used comes from the financial reports of PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda for the 2018-2022 period or five years and 40 company data was found. The RGEC method was employed during the data analysis. Based on the conducted analysis, it was discovered that PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda had a fairly excellent rating from 2018 to 2022 (Composite rating 3).    

This research aims to analyze the level of bank health and performance of Indonesian sharia banks using the RGEC method during the 2021-2022 period. Through this holistic approach, the research examines aspects of bank health, including risk profile, good corporate governance, income and capital. Data was obtained from the financial report of PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk, and analysis was carried out on credit risk, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return on Assets (ROA), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Research findings show that Indonesian sharia banks demonstrate health and stability in their operations, despite a decline in several performance indicators. These conclusions provide valuable insights for stakeholders in the Islamic banking industry to improve bank performance and stability.    

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of assessing banking soundness levels using the PT RGEC method. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk in 2018-2020. In this research, researchers used several research variables which include Risk Profile (NPL and LDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings (ROA, ROE, NIM, BOPO) and Capital (CAR). Based on research on the effectiveness of assessing the level of banking health at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk, using the RGEC method, shows that the bank's health status is in accordance with the standards set by Bank Indonesia regulations. For the 2018 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 90%, for the 2019 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 92.5%, for the 2020 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 90%. As well as the bank's health level in terms of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, earnings and Capital indicators at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk for 2018-2020 is "Very Healthy". It is hoped that future researchers will be more careful in carrying out calculations, can use better methods than this research and can add ratios so that the results of the research are more robust.

This study aims to see how the difference in financial performance between state-owned banks and national private banks through analysis from 2019 to 2022, using the RGEC approach to measure the level of bank health and the Zmijewski model to measure financial distress. With descriptive and comparative research types, as well as a quantitative approach, secondary data from four state-owned banks (Mandiri, BRI, BNI, BTN) and four private banks (BCA, CIMB, Danamon, Permata) were used. The analysis shows that private banks and state-owned banks do not have significantly different health levels in terms of risk profile (LDR and NPL), GCG, and earnings (NIM, ROA, BOPO). However, there are differences in the capital aspect (CAR). Overall, based on the Zmijewski X-score method, between private banks and state-owned banks do not have significantly different financial distress conditions. In conclusion, from 2019 to 2022, both state-owned banks and private banks show healthy financial conditions. Even though there are differences in the capital aspect, the overall health of state-owned banks is not significantly different from private banks.

Bank Indonesia issued regulations regarding the assessment of the health level of commercial banks based on PBI No.13/1/PBI/2011 using the RGEC method, which includes the following components: Risk profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This study aims to determine the condition of commercial banks as either very healthy, healthy, or sufficiently healthy, and to compare the health levels between Government-Owned Commercial Banks and National Private Commercial Banks. The research results indicate that the overall score for NPL, LDR, GCG, ROA, ROE, NIM, BOPO, and CAR ratios from 2017 to 2021 for National Private Commercial Banks is more stable compared to Government-Owned Commercial Banks, which means that the performance of National Private Commercial Banks is better overall. Although Government-Owned Commercial Banks performed better in terms of total score in 2017 and 2018, they experienced a decline in subsequent years. The assessment shows that National Private Commercial Banks perform better or health in terms of profitability and net income. Both types of commercial banks perform equally well in reducing non-performing loans, providing funds to their debtors, and maintaining capital adequacy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the health assessment of PT. Bank Negara Indonesia Persero Tbk which has been registered on the IDX is reviewed from the aspects of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital. This type of research is quantitative research and uses the RGEC method. From this research, on the Risk Profile which was measured using NPL, the results obtained in 2017, 2018 and 2019 were ranked 1, namely very healthy, in 2020 and 2021 they were ranked 2, namely healthy. In Good Corporate Governance, it has been stable for 5 years, ranking 2, namely good. In Earnings which are measured using Return On Assets, the results obtained in 2017, 2018 and 2019 were ranked 1, namely very healthy, in 2020 they were ranked 3, namely quite healthy, and in 2021 they were ranked 2, namely healthy. In terms of capital, which is measured using the Capital Adequacy Ratio, the consecutive results obtained in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 were ranked 1, namely very healthy.

This research aims to analysis the soundness level of banks using the RGEC method at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk in 2018-2021. The data studied is in the form of financial statements of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk for 2018-2021. The data collection technique used is the documentation technique. The data analysis technique used is a qualitative descriptive analysis technique using the RGEC method. The results of this research show that Bank Mandiri for 2018-2021 is viewed from the aspect of risk profile with two ratios, namely the ratio of Non-Performing Loans for banks in a healthy condition and the ratio of Loan to Deposit Ratio for banks in a fairly healthy condition. Aspects of Good Corporate Governance get the title of very healthy. Earnings aspect with two ratios, namely the ratio of the bank's Return on Assets in a very healthy condition and the ratio of the bank's Net Interest Margin in a healthy condition. Aspects of Capital with the ratio of Capital Adequacy Ratio of the bank is in very healthy condition.      

This study aims to determine the comparison of the soundness level of PT.  Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk based on Bank Indonesia Regulation (PBI) No.13/1/PBI/2011 concerning Assessment of Commercial Bank Validity Level using RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Eaming and Capital). The period used in his research was 5 years, starting from 2018 to 2022. The type of research used is descriptive research kualitative. The data obtained is in the form of secondary data in the form of annual financial statements of PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.  This study used an assessment method based on the calculation of each variable. Risk Profile assessment uses Non Performing Loan (NPL) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) ratios. Good Corporate Governance uses the results of Self Assessment of GCG implementation that has been published by PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Earnings valuation uses the ratio of Return On Asset (ROA) and Operating Expense Against Operating Income (BOPO).. Capital uses the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of research and data analysis using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital) methods can be concluded that PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk received a Composite Rating of 1 (PK-1) with the predicate "Very Healthy". This is evidenced by PT Bank Central Asia Tbk obtaining an average composite value of 97.33% and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk of 94.00% for the past 5 years. So it is proven that PT Bank Central Asia has a higher performance than PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.