Publication Search

This study aims to determine and analyze how the health comparison of PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk and PT Bank Bumi Arta Tbk based on earnings and capital for the 2016-2020 period. The collection technique in this research is using the documentation on financial statements and literature studies of the theories used. Sampling in the form of financial statements, income statements and balance sheets obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) which is accessed on the website www.idx.The data analysis technique used is quantitative descriptive analysis. Banking soundness level based on Earnings and capital consisting of ROA, ROE, NIM BOPO, and CAR. From the results of this study indicate that the health level of PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk is better than PT Bank Bumi Arta Tbk. This is due to differences in the level of supervision of the bank's health performance which give rise to different health management for each bank.

The activities of the Cahaya Phinisi Nusantara PT Bank Sulselbar cooperative can be measured based on the cooperative's financial performance. The good and bad financial performance of a cooperative can be assessed through financial reports in the form of a balance sheet or cooperative profit and loss report which is presented regularly. The aim of this research is to obtain an in-depth overview of Liquidity Ratio Analysis and Profitability Ratios in measuring financial performance in cooperatives. The research approach used is quantitative research with a descriptive approach. The descriptive method is a method used to collect, classify, analyze and interpret data related to the problem and compare it with the actual situation at the Cahaya Phinisi Nusantara Cooperative PT Bank Sulselbar and then draw conclusions. Analysis of Profitability Ratios at the Cahaya Phinisi Nusantara Cooperative PT. Bank Sulselbar in terms of the average value of Return On Assets (ROA) of four point forty three percent (4.43%) and Return On Equity (ROE) of five point eighty six percent ( 5.86%) where the value of the benchmark and determining the cooperative health predicate is five percent (5%) which indicates that it is not good at optimizing its own capital and investment in generating net profits.