Publication Search

Audit failure and inconsistencies in previous research results regarding the influence of auditor experience and self-efficacy on audit judgment serve as the main drivers of this study. This study aims to re-examine the relationship between auditor experience and self-efficacy on audit judgment at Public Accounting Firms in South Jakarta. Using a quantitative approach, this study employs purposive sampling techniques by distributing questionnaires as a data collection instrument, involving 70 auditors working at Public Accounting Firms in South Jakarta. The results of multiple linear regression analysis using IBM SPSS version 26 indicate that both auditor experience and self-efficacy have a positive and significant influence, both partially and simultaneously, on audit judgment. These findings provide evidence that improving auditors' work experience and self-confidence is crucial in producing high-quality audit decisions. This study offers new insights that can be used to enhance audit quality through the development of experience and strengthening auditors' self-efficacy. The findings are expected to contribute to better audit practices by focusing on factors that can improve auditors' ability to make accurate and effective judgments.

This study aims to test and analyze the influence of independence, task complexity, and auditor experience on audit judgment. Audit judgment is one of the important components in the audit process that determines the quality of audit report results. The better the auditor's consideration, the higher the level of reliability of the audited financial statements. This research was conducted at Public Accounting Firms (KAP) operating in the Bekasi area. The variables used in this study consisted of audit judgment as a dependent variable, and independence, task complexity, and auditor experience as independent variables. The sampling technique was carried out using a non-probability sampling method, using a purposive sampling approach. The sample obtained was 12 companies with a total of 76 auditor respondents. The analysis method used is Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) by measuring three stages: outer model test, inner model test, and hypothesis test. The results of the study show that the three independent variables, namely independence, task complexity, and auditor experience, have a positive and significant influence on audit judgment. This means that the higher the level of auditor independence, the more complex the tasks handled, and the more experience the auditor has, the better the audit considerations will be in the audit decision-making process. The implications of this study underscore the importance of maintaining and improving the quality of auditor professionalism, through continuous training, increasing flight hours, and maintaining an independent attitude in carrying out the audit process. In addition, the organization is also expected to provide adequate support for the sustainable development of auditor competencies. It is hoped that these findings can be an input for public accounting firms and related institutions in improving the quality of financial audit results and strengthening public trust in the auditor profession.

Audit judgment is the auditor's personal judgment or opinion in responding to information that influences decisions that affect audit evidence documents and the  auditor's  opinion  on  the  financial  statements  of  an  entity.  As  a  cognitive process,  audit  judgment  is  a  decision-making  behavior.  Accountants  are  often faced with decisions that  are not in accordance  with generally accepted  ethical standards  or  accounting  principles.  This  research  aims  to  find  out  and  analyze how   much   influence   task   complexity   (X1),   independence   (X2)   and   auditor knowledge (X3) have on audit judgment (Y) at the BPKP office of West Sumatra Province. analysis technique used multiple linear regression. based on research (X1), (X2) has no effect while (X3) has an effect on audit judgment.

This study aims to analyze the effect of compliance pressure, audit expertise, audit experience, and self-efficacy on audit judgment moderated by task complexity. The technique used in sampling is purposive sampling technique and obtained by 120 people. Data was collected using a survey method with data collection techniques using a questionnaire distributed to the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP). The data analysis technique used moderated regression analysis. The results show that compliance does not affect the audit judgment. Meanwhile, audit expertise, audit experience, and self-efficacy affect the audit judgment. The complexity of the task does not strengthen the effect of obedience pressure on audit judgment. In addition, complexity strengthens the effect of audit expertise, audit experience, and self-efficacy on audit judgment.