Publication Search

The Village Fund Direct Cash Assistance Program (BLT-DD) is a social protection instrument designed to help low-income families meet their basic needs. However, its implementation often faces challenges such as targeting inaccuracies, limited data, and varying administrative capacity at the village level. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of BLT-DD using William N. Dunn’s six policy evaluation criteria through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, covering effectiveness, efficiency, equity, responsiveness, conceptual alignment, and implementation. The findings indicate that BLT-DD is fairly effective in helping households maintain consumption, yet its effectiveness and adequacy remain constrained by the amount of assistance and the quality of data collection. Program efficiency and responsiveness are relatively good in villages with sufficient governance capacity, while equity emerges as the weakest aspect due to inaccurate data verification. Conceptually, BLT-DD aligns with the needs of low-income communities, but implementation accuracy still requires reinforcement. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for more systematic monitoring mechanisms, cross-sectoral data integration, and administrative training for village officials to enhance service quality. Overall, BLT-DD provides valuable support but requires improvements in governance and data systems to optimize outcomes, including regular evaluation strategies and refinement of supporting regulations.

This aims to examine and analyze the implementation of the cash transfer assistance policy in efforts to alleviate poverty in Moodu Urban Village, Kota Timur Subdistrict, Gorontalo City. This research employed a qualitative method. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of the policy implementation has not yet been optimal due to several influencing factors: (1) policy standards and target groups have not been fully accurate; (2) available resources, both in terms of the number of implementing personnel and supporting infrastructure, remain very limited; (3) inter-organizational communication and activity reinforcement are less effective; (4) the characteristics of implementing agents reveal that some officers do not yet fully understand the procedures and mechanisms for distributing cash transfer assistance; (5) the economic, social, and political environment of the Moodu community, which is predominantly engaged in the informal sector, presents additional challenges in ensuring program effectiveness; and (6) the attitudes of implementers, in the absence of continuous guidance and periodic supervision, increase the potential for administrative errors and inaccurate distribution.

The Non-Cash Food Assistance Program (BPNT) is a government policy aimed at reducing the expenditure burden of poor households through the provision of food assistance in non-cash form. However, its implementation at the village level still faces various challenges. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the BPNT Program in Tolotio Village, Tibawa District, Gorontalo Regency, and to identify the factors influencing its implementation. This research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis involving village government officials, the Social Affairs Office, BPNT facilitators, and beneficiary communities. The results indicate that the implementation of BPNT in Tolotio Village is relatively effective in supporting food needs and enhancing the independence of Beneficiary Families (KPM). Nevertheless, several issues remain, including inaccurate targeting of beneficiaries, limited technological literacy, and insufficient transparency and updating of beneficiary data. The factors affecting program effectiveness include the availability of implementing resources, the support of physical facilities and technology, the effectiveness of communication among stakeholders, and the level of community acceptance and response. The findings imply the need for regular data updating, improved socialization, and strengthened coordination and supervision to ensure that the BPNT Program is implemented more fairly, accurately targeted, and sustainably.

Non-Cash Food Assistance (BPNT) is a government assistance program aimed at poor or underprivileged communities, distributed monthly through electronic accounts and used specifically to purchase basic necessities at designated E-Warong stores. However, in reality, the implementation of the BPNT program in the field still faces comprehensive challenges, such as issues related to targeting inaccuracy and the quality of food obtained by KPM not always meeting standards. The purpose of this study is to explore the evaluation of the Non-Cash Food Assistance (BPNT) program policy through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, so that researchers can trace various empirical findings regarding the implementation of the Non-Cash Food Assistance program policy in several regions. The policy evaluation model used is William N Dunn's model, which includes six indicators, namely effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy. The results of this study are expected to provide a comprehensive and in-depth picture of the phenomenon being studied in an objective and systematic manner, and can be used as a reference for government agencies in evaluating and optimizing the implementation of the BPNT program policy so that it becomes a more effective and sustainable social assistance program.

This study aims to analyze the impact of government expenditure development and government budgeting on the social assistance recipients affected by floods. The research approach uses a quantitative method with a total of 50 respondents selected through sampling techniques. Data processing was conducted using SPSS software with various statistical tests, including validity test, reliability test, multiple linear regression, t-test, and F-test. The results show that the development of government expenditure has a significant impact on the condition of the social assistance recipients. Additionally, government budgeting also has a significant impact on the effectiveness of social assistance distribution after the disaster. Simultaneously, both variables have a strong influence on the social assistance recipients, as reflected by the significant F-test value and the coefficient of determination (R Square) of 0.518. This means that 51.8% of the variation in the condition of social assistance recipients can be explained by the development of government expenditure and government budgeting. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate expenditure and budgeting policies to enhance the effectiveness of social assistance distribution, especially in disaster situations.

The National Food Assistance Program (Non-Cash Food Assistance/BPNT) is one of the social policy instruments designed by the Indonesian government to enhance food security and improve the welfare of poor households. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of this program by assessing its accessibility, targeting accuracy, commodity quality, and its impact on household expenditure and stability of food consumption.The research methodology uses a descriptive-analytical approach, combining secondary data from official government reports and academic literature with primary data in the form of a limited survey of beneficiaries.The results of the analysis indicate that the program is quite effective in increasing poor households' access to staple foods, primarily through the more transparent and flexible non-cash distribution mechanism. However, several constraints are still found, including inaccurate targeting of beneficiaries, variation in food quality at the e-warung level, and the limited digital literacy of some households.Nevertheless, the program is proven to be able to reduce the burden of food expenditure and improve consumption quality, thereby contributing positively to the welfare of poor households. This research suggests improving the validation of beneficiary data, supervising distribution, and expanding food and digital education for the community to further optimize the program's effectiveness.

This research was conducted in Curahmalang Village, Rambipuji District, with the aim of determining how the Family Hope Program (PKH) policy is implemented in improving the welfare of beneficiary families (KPM). PKH, as one of the conditional social assistance programs designed by the government, plays a strategic role in poverty alleviation efforts, so it is important to assess the extent to which this policy is effective at the village level. This research used a descriptive qualitative method with policy implementation indicators referring to the George C. Edward III model, which includes aspects of communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. Research data were obtained through primary and secondary data using data collection techniques such as observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, then analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that PKH implementation in Curahmalang Village was influenced by these four factors. From the communication aspect, information delivery, clarity, and consistency of communication were considered quite good due to the role of facilitators in bridging the government with beneficiaries. In terms of resources, the availability of facilitators and information was adequate, but the utilization of facilities, especially health facilities, was not fully optimal because some beneficiaries did not utilize them according to their needs. The disposition aspect shows that the implementer's attitude and compliance towards Beneficiary Families (KPM) are relatively good, although some participants are still less committed to fulfilling program obligations. Meanwhile, in the aspect of bureaucratic structure, weaknesses were found, particularly in terms of coordination and cooperation between PKH facilitators and the village government, which has not been running optimally, thus impacting the effectiveness of work patterns.

Gunung Kijang Subdistrict in Bintan Regency is one of the areas still facing various socio-economic challenges, particularly related to poverty issues. The problems faced include low income, limited access to education and healthcare, lack of employment opportunities, and low quality of life. Therefore, the Family Hope Program (PKH) is present as a social policy intervention from the government to help reduce the impact of poverty both directly and in the long term in Gunung Kijang by fulfilling basic needs, increasing participation in education, raising awareness of the importance of health, and empowerment through social assistance. This study aims to determine the extent of PKH’s effectiveness in reducing poverty rates in Gunung Kijang Subdistrict, Bintan Regency. The study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data collection techniques include interviews, direct field observations, and documentation. In its analysis, this study refers to William N. Dunn’s public policy evaluation theory, which includes six main indicators: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy. The results show that PKH has a positive impact on beneficiary families (KPM). The program increases school attendance of children from poor families in primary and secondary schools, as attendance is an important component in the disbursement of aid. In addition, PKH encourages poor communities to be more active in accessing health services, such as community health centers (puskesmas) and integrated health service posts (posyandu), especially for vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, toddlers, and the elderly. The Family Hope Program (PKH) contributes to reducing the impact of poverty in Gunung Kijang Subdistrict. Although it has not fully resolved the root problems, PKH has the potential to be a tool to break the cycle of poverty and improve the quality of life of poor communities sustainably.  

This study aims to examine the role of law in poverty eradication in Indonesia through the analysis of regulations and implementation of government programs. With a descriptive qualitative approach based on literature studies, this study explores the effectiveness of books as an instrument of public policy. The findings show that the law has not functioned optimally as a tool for social transformation, tends to be administrative and not yet adaptive to the dynamics of poverty. Case studies in several regions such as Malang, Trenggalek, and Aceh Tamiang highlight weak coordination, data validation, and community participation. The main obstacles include limited local regulations, inaccurate targeting of assistance, and minimal legal-based supervision. Therefore, proactive, participatory, and contextual legal reform is needed so that poverty alleviation policies truly side with vulnerable groups. The law must be present not only as a norm, but as a structural force that guarantees distributive justice and social empowerment.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the National Cash Social Assistance (BST) policy on the purchasing power of communities in Surabaya. BST is a social protection program launched by the Indonesian government in response to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The policy targets low-income and vulnerable groups through direct cash transfers, with the goal of maintaining basic consumption levels and preventing a sharp decline in household welfare. This research examines the extent to which the BST program has achieved its objectives, particularly in enhancing or sustaining the purchasing power of its beneficiaries in urban settings. The study employs an evaluative approach using a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative survey data with qualitative interviews involving aid recipients and local-level implementers. The findings indicate that the BST program had a positive short-term impact on household purchasing power, particularly in meeting essential needs such as food and utility expenses. However, several implementation challenges were also identified, including issues of inaccurate beneficiary targeting, delays in distribution, and the relatively small amount of assistance compared to actual household need. These results highlight that the effectiveness of social policy is not solely dependent on budget allocation but also on the precision of its implementation on the ground. Consequently, the study recommends improvements in beneficiary data updating, enhanced transparency in aid distribution, and the development of more adaptive program designs that reflect local socio-economic conditions. The findings are expected to serve as a valuable reference for policymakers in designing more efficient and sustainable social assistance programs in the future.  

This study uses a qualitative literature review method to analyze the impact of social protection programs on poverty reduction in urban areas from a public economics perspective. The main focus of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of various government social interventions such as cash assistance, basic needs subsidies, and social security, based on scholarly literature, journals, and official policy documents. Social protection programs are considered vital instruments in improving the welfare of poor and vulnerable populations, especially in urban environments with complex socio-economic dynamics. The findings show that well-planned and well-targeted social protection plays a significant role in reducing household expenditures among the poor, increasing purchasing power, and strengthening economic resilience. In addition, social protection can encourage economic participation among vulnerable groups through empowerment and improved access to basic services. This study also highlights the importance of institutional synergy and continuous evaluation to ensure that social protection policies have a long-term impact on poverty alleviation.

This study aims to measure the effectiveness of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in improving the welfare of poor households in Bekasi Regency. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the study focuses on an in-depth understanding of the perceptions and experiences of program beneficiaries. Data was collected through both closed and open-ended questionnaires distributed to 60 respondents, consisting of 50 Beneficiary Families (KPM) and 10 social facilitators. Data analysis was conducted using quantitative descriptive methods for the closed questionnaires, and thematic analysis for the open-ended responses and document study. The results show that more than 75% of respondents felt a positive impact in the field of education, while 72% regularly accessed health services such as Posyandu. Economically, 68% of respondents stated that the PKH assistance helped meet their basic needs, although it was not sufficient for long-term needs. Regarding implementation, 80% of respondents expressed satisfaction with the social facilitation provided, although administrative procedures and limited access in remote areas remain challenges. The conclusion of this study indicates that PKH has a significant social impact on poor households. However, the program’s effectiveness still needs improvement through streamlined administrative processes, adjustment of the aid amount, and greater attention to hard-to-reach areas so that the program’s benefits can be felt more evenly and sustainably.

Drug abuse is a serious social problem in Indonesia, including in Mojokerto City. The government, through Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, has established medical rehabilitation programs as a primary solution for handling drug users. This study aims to analyze the implementation of medical rehabilitation facilities for drug users at the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) of Mojokerto City and identify the challenges faced in its implementation. The findings indicate that the medical rehabilitation program has been carried out through various stages, including detoxification, medical therapy, and psychosocial assistance. However, several obstacles hinder its effectiveness, such as limited human resources and facilities, social stigma against drug users, and suboptimal inter-agency coordination. Therefore, improvements in facilities, medical personnel, and stigma reduction strategies are needed to support the success of rehabilitation programs for drug users.

This study investigates the impact of public policy on social welfare, specifically through the lens of social assistance programs in the digital era. As technology continues to evolve, the implementation of social assistance programs has transformed, leading to new opportunities for enhancing service delivery and accessibility. This research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative case studies to assess the effectiveness of these programs in improving social welfare outcomes. The findings reveal that while digital tools can enhance the reach and efficiency of social assistance initiatives, challenges such as digital divide and data privacy concerns must be addressed to ensure equitable access for all beneficiaries. Ultimately, this study underscores the importance of integrating technology into public policy frameworks to foster sustainable social welfare improvements in an increasingly digital world.

Poverty among foreign nationals is an increasingly pressing global issue that is often overlooked in public policy. This study examines government policies designed to address poverty among migrants and refugees and their impact on their economic well-being. The main focus of the study is to highlight the effectiveness of different policy approaches that have been implemented in different countries and identify best practices that can be adapted to different national contexts. Through an analysis of existing policies in several countries, including Germany and Canada, and relevant case studies, the study finds that approaches based on social and economic integration, employment, and direct assistance can play a significant role in reducing poverty among foreign nationals. The results show that policies that involve collaboration between governments, non-governmental organizations, and local communities are often more effective in achieving the desired outcomes. This study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for future development policies that are more inclusive and effective. In doing so, it is hoped that this study will contribute to improving the economic well-being of foreign nationals and assist governments in designing policies that are more responsive to the needs of this group.

This article examines the regulations for the Family Hope Program (PKH) and Non-Cash Food Assistance (BPNT) and their implementation in the Medan City Social Service. This research uses a normative method with a descriptive approach. The research results show that existing regulations have provided a clear framework for the implementation of PKH and BPNT, but there are still challenges in implementation. This case study identifies several obstacles and offers recommendations to improve program effectiveness.  

Policy program evaluation is a systematic process for evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance and impact of a government policy or program. The main objective is to understand the extent to which the program or policy has succeeded in achieving its objectives, as well as to identify areas of improvement or adjustments needed. Policy evaluation is a step important in a sustainable public policy cycle, helping to ensure that policies can provide maximum benefits for the community. The State Children's Village is a program designed by the Surabaya City Social Service to provide services and protection to children who are in need and have social problems in their area. Evaluation of the development program for children with social welfare in the Surabaya City Social Service's State Children's Village was carried out comprehensively to ensure the effectiveness and positive impact of the program. The State Children's Village Program is an initiative of the Surabaya City Social Service which aims to provide guidance and assistance to children who suffer from social welfare. need, especially those who are considered recipients of social welfare or have social problems. This program focuses on developing children through training, coaching and mentoring so that they can live better, more humanely, and learn to behave normally. Through a comprehensive evaluation, the coaching program Kampung Anak Negeri can ensure that efforts to develop children in the city of Surabaya really have a significant impact in improving their welfare and creating better conditions for future generations.

Direct Cash Assistance (BLT) is a significant policy instrument in efforts to alleviate poverty and improve community welfare. This article focuses on an in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of BLT as a social policy tool. The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of BLT on recipient communities and examine the key aspects that influence its effectiveness. This research includes literature analysis and empirical data to measure the impact of BLT on poverty levels, access to education, health and other social aspects. The research results show that BLT has great potential in reducing poverty and increasing people's access to basic services. However, the effectiveness of BLT is also related to factors such as program design, recipient selection, and distribution mechanisms. This article also discusses challenges in implementing BLT, such as administrative costs and policy issues. In addition, this article provides an overview of how BLT can be integrated into a broader social policy context. In its conclusion, this research highlights the important role of BLT in helping economically vulnerable communities. However, the success of BLT depends on careful and evidence-based implementation, as well as good coordination with other social policies. This article makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the effectiveness of BLT as an important social policy instrument.

This research is a descriptive qualitative study that aims to analyze the Evaluation of the Implementation of the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program in Tawiri Village, Teluk Ambon District.                 This research was conducted in Tawiri Village, Teluk Ambon Sub-district. Primary data were collected through interviews with a number of informants who were directly involved in the implementation of the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program in Tawiri Village, Teluk Ambon Sub-district.                 The results showed that the implementation of the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program in Tawiri Village, Teluk Ambon Sub-district went well despite the many obstacles encountered. This can be seen from 6 (six) policy evaluation criteria namely effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness and accuracy where four of them have not been implemented optimally. So for the suggestions submitted, namely the need to submit the latest data or government officials must make updates related to Non-Cash Food Assistance for underprivileged people who do not get assistance and consult directly with village assistants, the Government as the organizer is obliged to provide socialization to Beneficiary Families about the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program, the Government also needs to improve administrative data on families who receive benefits.