Publication Search

Learning planning is a learning activity or activity that is structured through planning. The aim of this planning is to achieve the expected results and even produce potential students. Therefore, before carrying out learning, teachers must prepare a learning plan. An educator must have a learning plan because it is very important and even becomes a guideline and standard in achieving goals. The aim of this research is to find out how the implementation of learning planning affects teacher performance and the learning process. This research uses a qualitative descriptive research method. And good learning planning will make the implementation of learning run effectively and well.

This research aims to describe the planning, implementation, and challenges of teacher evaluation in poetry writing instruction for class X E-7 at SMA 1 Pertiwi. Data were collected through observation and documentation. The analysis results indicate that affective domain assessment involves poetry appreciation, emotional expression, and student engagement in the creative writing process. This qualitative method positively impacts students’ interest and motivation, leading to increased creativity and poetry writing skills. Empirical data show that students respond well to affective domain assessment, feeling more valued and supported, which positively affects their attitude towards writing poetry. It is recommended to integrate affective domain assessment methods more widely into the curriculum, including teacher training and the development of supportive teaching materials. This research provides valuable information for teachers and other educators to improve the quality of poetry writing instruction. Affective domain assessment methods have proven effective in creating a more supportive and inspiring learning environment. This research also highlights the challenges teachers face in conducting such evaluations.

Cognitive domain assessment is an important component in the learning process which aims to measure students' mastery of knowledge and thinking abilities. This research presents the concepts, principles and implementation of cognitive assessment in education through literature studies. Bloom's Taxonomy revised by Anderson and Krathwohl divides the cognitive domain into six levels: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, analyzing, and creating. Developing an effective cognitive assessment instrument requires systematic planning, starting from determining objectives to analyzing question items. Various assessment techniques such as multiple choice tests, short content, descriptions, and true and false can be used according to learning objectives. Challenges in implementing cognitive assessments include difficulties in designing instruments that measure higher-order thinking abilities. A deep understanding of the principles and techniques of cognitive assessment is essential for educators to improve the quality of learning and assessment.  

The purpose of this study is to describe the use of a scientific approach to the academic achievement of SMA N 1 V Koto Kampung Dalam students in the field of dance. This type of research is classroom action research or classroom action research. This research uses in two stages, namely planning, implementation, observation and reflection. Research tools are observation charts and direct experiments. Data was collected through literature research, observation, tests and documentation. The data is analyzed by a percentage formula. The scientific approach in dance education makes learning very effective, active and fun. Dance learning with a scientific approach can increase student enthusiasm and creativity, it can be seen from the addition of student learning activities with general indicators of student learning activities increasing each meeting with an average percentage of student achievement. at the 1st meeting 49.6% with poor criteria, at the 2nd meeting the average number of students with less good criteria was 61.3% and at the 3rd meeting it rose to 62.7% with quite good criteria After the second period, student learning outcomes rose at each meeting, the average percentage of student learning outcomes at meeting I was 71.7% very good, at meeting II it rose to 76.5% very good criteria.