Publication Search

The function of Prosecutorial Intelligence (Intel Kejaksaan) holds a crucial strategic role, not only in supporting prosecution duties but also in crime prevention, safeguarding national development, and recovering state assets. Despite having a strong legal basis and a broad mandate, this function often faces operational challenges, data integration issues, and resource optimization constraints that limit its effectiveness within the dynamic law enforcement ecosystem. This research aims to deeply analyze the role and challenges of Prosecutorial Intelligence and formulate a model for optimizing its function to enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement in Indonesia. The research methodology employed is normative and sociological juridical with a qualitative approach, gathering data through literature review, regulatory study, and in-depth interviews with practitioners and academics. The findings indicate that the optimization of the Prosecutorial Intelligence function requires three main pillars: (1) Enhancing the capacity and professionalism of human resources (HR) through modern intelligence training and digital forensics. (2) Integrating and ensuring interoperability of the intelligence information system with other law enforcement agencies (Police, KPK, PPATK) to build a comprehensive intelligence big data. (3) Expanding the spectrum of intelligence operations, shifting from a traditional focus on corruption crimes to transnational crimes, cybercrime, and securing strategic national investments. This optimization is expected to transform Prosecutorial Intelligence into a proactive, data-oriented strategic early warning system capable of supporting Prosecutors in making evidence-based decisions, thus achieving effective, just, and impactful law enforcement for the community.

Political economic analysis in handling economic inequality in Indonesia reveals that although the Gini Ratio shows a decline, economic inequality remains a serious issue. Inequality is seen from the uneven distribution of income, access to education, and economic opportunities. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of political economy in handling economic inequality and to open up policies that have been implemented in Indonesia. The research method used is qualitative research with a descriptive analytical approach. The government has launched various policies such as social assistance and infrastructure development, but implementation challenges such as resources, corruption, and lack of coordination between institutions still hamper the effectiveness of these policies.

This study discusses the phenomenon of increasing corruption cases in Indonesia, which is caused by the lack of effective criminal penalties. Although Law No. 20/2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption regulates the threat of the death penalty for perpetrators of corruption, in practice it has never been implemented. This study uses the approach of the law enforcement system theory and the theory of punishment, with normative legal methods and literature studies. The results show that the difficulty of implementing the death penalty in corruption cases in Indonesia is caused by the pros and cons and rejection from the community and law enforcement. This finding indicates the importance of reforming the death penalty policy for perpetrators of corruption to provide a deterrent effect and prevent similar cases in the future. Therefore, this study recommends improving the law enforcement system and more effective anti-corruption policies.

This article explores the significant role of the Mamluk Dynasty of Egypt in the history of Islamic civilization during the medieval period and examines the impact of its conflict with the Ottoman Empire. The Mamluk Dynasty, ruling from 1250 to 1517 CE, was uniquely established by former military slaves who rose to power. The dynasty played a crucial role in defending the Islamic world from Mongol invasions and Crusader attacks, notably through its victory at the Battle of 'Ain Jalut. However, in its final decades, the Mamluks suffered from internal strife, corruption, and failure to adapt to modern military developments. This study employs a descriptive qualitative and historical research approach, utilizing both primary and secondary sources. The main focus is the political and military confrontation between the Mamluks and the Ottomans, culminating in two decisive battles Marj Dabiq (1516 CE) and Ar-Raidaniyah (1517 CE) which ended Mamluk rule and marked the beginning of Islamic political unification under the Ottoman Caliphate.  

This study uses a qualitative method to provide an in-depth description of the strategic role of village funds within the State Budget (APBN) in improving the welfare of rural communities. Village funds allocated by the central government aim to accelerate development, reduce regional disparities, and strengthen economic independence at the village level. This research examines the mechanisms of distribution, management, and utilization of village funds and relates them to welfare indicators such as income, access to basic services, and economic empowerment. The results show that when managed transparently, accountably, and with community participation, village funds can improve quality of life through infrastructure development, better education and health services, and the growth of micro and small enterprises. However, challenges such as weak capacity of village officials, corruption practices, and lack of supervision remain obstacles that must be addressed. Therefore, synergy between central and regional governments and the community is key to the successful implementation of village funds.    

This study aims to describe the forms of bureaucratic pathology occurring in public administration practices in Indonesia through a case study in local government institutions. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a case study approach. Data collection techniques were conducted through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The findings show that bureaucratic pathology in the forms of corruption, nepotism, and inefficiency still dominates public service delivery. Corruption appears in budget misuse, nepotism in the appointment of officials based on family ties, and inefficiency is evident in slow and unresponsive bureaucratic procedures. This study emphasizes the need for comprehensive bureaucratic reform to reduce such pathologies.

In the modern government administration system, bureaucracy plays a central role in running the wheels of government and public services, but it often faces bureaucratic pathologies that hinder performance and reduce public trust. This research aims to examine how the principles of good governance are implemented to prevent various issues that often occur within the bureaucracy. The main focus is to identify the types of problems that frequently arise, assess how the principles of good governance are implemented in bureaucratic institutions, and examine the extent to which this affects the efficiency and quality of public services. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a literature study, which involves the analysis of literature related to bureaucratic pathology and good governance. The research results show that bureaucratic pathologies, such as corruption, collusion, and nepotism, as well as inefficiencies in public service, can be addressed through the application of good governance principles that emphasize transparency, accountability, public participation, and the rule of law. The discussion shows that bureaucratic reform needs to address changes in the mindset and values within the organization, while also utilizing information technology to make bureaucratic work more efficient. In conclusion, the consistent implementation of good governance can prevent bureaucratic pathologies and create an efficient, clean, and responsive bureaucracy to the needs of society, thereby increasing public trust in the government.

The third amendment to Law Number 1 of 2025 on State-Owned Enterprises has presented several juridical issues that need to be studied in depth, one of which is related to the establishment of the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency (Danantara). One of the main issues is the lack of public participation in drafting regulations, both at the planning stage and the formulation of legal norms. In addition, the existence of Danantara, which adopts the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) model, raises the potential for overlap with a similar institution, the Indonesia Investment Authority (INA), which was established earlier. Provisions regarding the filling of organ positions, exceptions to the definition of state finances and losses, and weak external oversight mechanisms further strengthen concerns about irregularities in governance. These conditions are potentially at odds with the general principles of good governance (AAUPB), the Law on Government Administration, the Law on State Ministries, and the Law on the Eradication of Corruption. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the establishment of the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency (Danantara), focusing on the legal basis for its establishment and its compatibility with the principles of constitutional law and government administration in Indonesia.

Corruption and the rule of law are two things that are not foreign in the order of national, state and social life. Corruption seems to be a vocabulary that is experiencing inflation because it is most often used in almost all news reports. However, in corruption cases, judges are often less observant in paying attention to the facts presented in the trial so that often defendants in corruption cases are not punished commensurate with their actions, some even end in acquittals. The research method used by the author is normative legal research, by reviewing or examining laws and court decisions related to the legal problems faced. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that The basis for the Supreme Court's consideration in rejecting the public prosecutor's cassation application regarding the acquittal in corruption (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number: 2205 K/Pid.Sus/2022) is by considering the legal and non-legal aspects. Regarding the effectiveness of the decision in providing a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption in the future, judges in considering a decision should pay close attention to the facts in the trial so that the defendant's actions can be subject to sanctions and in the future can provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption in the future. The judge's consideration in imposing a sentence after the examination process in court must pay maximum attention to the sense of justice of the actions that have been committed by the defendant so that the verdict can provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption in the future.

Conflicts of interest in corruption cases often involve abuse of power for personal gain. This article discusses the corruption case committed by Harvey Moeis with an emphasis on how conflicts of interest play a role in the occurrence of corruption. The purpose of this study is to analyze the link between conflicts of interest and corruption cases involving Harvey Moeis, its impact on law, ethics, and reputation, as well as find solutions to prevent similar cases. The methods used were purposive sampling in the selection of data sources as well as literature study to analyze related perspectives. The results of the analysis reveal that the corruption case involving Harvey Moeis demonstrates how financial conflicts of interest can culminate in abuses of power that harm the state and tarnish the law, ethics, and reputation. Strengthening regulation, transparency, law enforcement, and public participation as well as strengthening anticorruption institutions is therefore needed to prevent corrupt practices.

Corruption is an extraordinary crime and has a systemic impact that is detrimental to the state and society at large. To overcome this problem, the Indonesian legal system provides the option of implementing the death penalty, which is regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. However, the application of the death penalty has raised significant debate from various perspectives, both legal, philosophical, and sociological, considering that this action is contrary to the principle of respect for human rights. This study will discuss the threat of the death penalty as a form of ultimum remedium, namely as a last resort carried out in certain circumstances, such as when corruption occurs in a crisis or disaster situation. To analyze the effectiveness and urgency of implementing the death penalty in the context of anti-corruption law enforcement, a legal-normative approach is used

Law enforcement in civil cases that have obtained permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) often faces various complex challenges. For example, in land ownership cases that may be suspected of being linked to corruption crimes. Therefore, law enforcement officials must ensure that there is strong and sufficient evidence to process criminal elements without undermining the legal certainty of civil cases that have been decided. Good coordination between civil and criminal judicial institutions is also essential to ensure that justice can be comprehensively upheld. This research is qualitative in nature regarding concepts, relevant laws, and legal facts related to the issues being studied. The data obtained is subsequently analyzed using descriptive analysis, which is an analysis conducted by elaborating the obtained data. The research results show that: (1) The procedure executed by law enforcement officials aligns with the legal authority granted to them. However, the process may result in losses for parties legally proven not to have committed unlawful acts, as evidenced by the final and binding legal decision, with the case dependent on further evidentiary proceedings; (2) Obstacles in law enforcement processes stem from three primary factors: the law itself, law enforcement officials, and society, wherein socio-political interventions can provoke public opinion and conflicts between law enforcement and the community.

This study aims to analyze the song “Bayar Bayar Bayar” using the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach based on Teun A. van Dijk’s model. The song was selected due to its explicit criticism of corruption and abuse of power within the Indonesian police institution. The analysis covers three main dimensions in Van Dijk’s theory: discourse structure (macrostructure, superstructure, and microstructure), social cognition, and social context. The analysis reveals that thematically, the song represents the collective experience of society in facing bureaucratic injustice, particularly in the form of illegal levies by the authorities. Its repetitive and straightforward superstructure strengthens the main message. At the microstructural level, the use of direct language, punk-styled stylistics, and the rhetorical repetition of “bayar polisi” (pay the police) create a provocative effect and reinforce the social critique being delivered. In terms of social cognition, the song reflects the public's mental model of the police as an institution that perpetuates social inequality rather than acting as a neutral protector. From a social context perspective, the song emerges from the reality of unequal power relations between citizens and authorities, serving as a symbolic form of resistance against hegemonic power structures. “Bayar Bayar Bayar” is thus not only a musical work but also an ideological expression with critical discourse value in advocating for social justice.  

Money laundering is the act of changing or hiding money or assets resulting from crime to appear to have come from a legal source. Haram funds can damage the market and harm honest business actors. The study addresses two main issues: Does digital financial transactions fall into the category of money laundering. Are the rules related to digital transactions included in the crime of money laundering (TPPU)? The research was carried out using the method of juridical analysis, which is to examine the applicable legal rules. The results show that digital transactions have the potential to be used for money laundering, especially through technologies such as digital payments and cryptocurrencies that can disguise transaction traces. Technological advances and lifestyle changes also affect the economic system. Today, electronic money is widely used through e-commerce, online transportation services, and digital merchants. Based on Articles 3, 4, and 5 of the Anti-Corruption Law, anyone who disguises the origin of assets from criminal acts — including through digital transactions — can be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to Rp10 billion.

The existence of laws in health has been proven to have serious impacts on the health sector in various countries, including Indonesia. Through an analysis of philosophical texts and related research, this article reveals how corrupt practices affect the allocation of funds for the health system, disrupt the provision of adequate health facilities and services, and affect the quality of medical services. The economic implications of corruption on the health sector, including the high cost of obtaining quality health services and unequal access to health services. The social impacts of corruption are also analyzed, including poverty, unequal income distribution, and increased risk of criminal acts. In an effort to minimize the negative impacts of corruption on public health, this article proposes the implementation of strategies of transparency, accountability, and public participation. Implementation of the systeme-governmentand the active role of society ascitizen controlis a concrete step that can be taken to combat corruption and ensure more efficient and transparent use of public resources. The need for a joint role from the government, civil society, and the private sector in building a health system that is fairer, more transparent, and free from corruption. By strengthening the foundations of democracy and prioritizing transparency, Indonesia can move towards more equitable and quality public health for all people.

The palm oil industry is a strategic sector that significantly contributes to Indonesia's economy through crude palm oil (CPO) exports. However, it is also prone to corruption practices, as revealed in the bribery case involving a judge in the handling of a CPO export trial. This scandal highlights corporate involvement in influencing court decisions for business interests and the weak law enforcement against corporations as the main perpetrators of criminal acts. This paper aims to analyze the chronology and modus operandi of the bribery, identify factors behind the weak corporate criminal liability enforcement, and formulate recommendations to strengthen the legal system to prevent similar cases in the future. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory and case approaches. The data is analyzed qualitatively to assess the effectiveness of regulations and the obstacles in implementing corporate criminal liability. This study is expected to contribute to reforming a fairer and more accountable legal system in strategic economic sectors.    

This study examines the tax policies during the time of Abu Yusuf, a prominent Islamic scholar and economist who significantly contributed to the Islamic financial system through his work Kitab al-Khara. The research aims to analyze Abu Yusuf's taxation concepts, their implementation during the Abbasid Caliphate, and their relevance to modern taxation systems, particularly in Indonesia. This study employs a qualitative method with a literature review approach. The findings indicate that Abu Yusuf favored a proportional tax system (muqasamah) over a fixed tax system (misahah), as it is fairer and more adaptable to economic fluctuations. He also emphasized the importance of tax officials' integrity, transparency in tax administration, and strict supervision of tax collectors to prevent corruption. This study highlights that Abu Yusuf’s taxation principles remain relevant in modern taxation systems, particularly in terms of fairness, efficiency, and fiscal transparency.

This study aims to analyze efforts to prevent and eradicate corruption in the context of digitalization in Bandar Lampung. The digitalization era brings significant changes in the way government and society interact, which has the potential to create opportunities for corrupt practices. The research method used is a qualitative approach with data analysis from interviews, documentation studies, and observations. The results of the study indicate that although there have been preventive measures through the application of information technology, there are still loopholes that can be exploited by perpetrators of corruption. The main causal factors include the lack of legal awareness among the community, as well as minimal supervision and transparency in the use of the budget. This study recommends the need for increased training for law enforcement officers, as well as the implementation of a stricter and more transparent supervision system in the use of digital technology. Thus, this study is expected to provide valuable insights for policy makers in formulating more effective strategies to prevent and eradicate corruption, as well as increasing legal awareness among the Bandar Lampung community in this digital era.

The integrity of legal apparatus is the main foundation in creating a fair and trustworthy justice system. This article discusses the importance of professional ethics in public service, especially for legal apparatus such as judges, prosecutors, police, and advocates. Using qualitative research methods through literature studies, this article analyzes the challenges and solutions in maintaining the integrity of legal apparatus. The results of the study indicate that strengthening the code of ethics, strict supervision, and continuing education are key to preventing abuse of authority and corruption. This article also emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in every legal process to ensure public trust in the justice system.

The corruption case in the BTS 4G project by the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (Kominfo), which involved the misuse of funds in the construction of BTS towers in Indonesia's 3T (underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost) regions, has become a major public concern in recent years. The Rp 9.8 trillion project is suspected to have been misappropriated by several officials involved. This study aims to examine the role of social media in increasing public participation in the monitoring and mitigation of the corruption case. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach combined with social media analysis. The findings show that social media plays a significant role in accelerating the dissemination of information related to the BTS 4G corruption case, raising public awareness, and exerting social pressure on law enforcement agencies to take action. Furthermore, social media also facilitates digital activism, which mobilizes public support and strengthens oversight of government policies. This study concludes that social media serves as an effective tool for social control, although it also faces challenges in terms of the spread of hoaxes and disinformation.