Publication Search

This study aims to analyze the effect of Quick Ratio (QR) and Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) on Return on Assets (ROA), both partially and simultaneously, at PT X during the period 2014–2023. The background of this study is based on the importance of liquidity and capital structure in influencing a company's ability to generate profits. QR is used as an indicator of company liquidity, while DER reflects the proportion of debt usage in the capital structure. ROA is chosen as a measure of profitability because it illustrates the company's effectiveness in utilizing total assets to generate profits. The research method used is a quantitative method. The study population consists of all annual financial reports of PT X, with samples in the form of financial position reports and income statements from 2014 to 2023. Data analysis was carried out through several stages, namely descriptive analysis, classical assumption tests, coefficient of determination tests, multiple linear regression, and hypothesis testing to examine the relationship between variables. The results of the study indicate that partially the Quick Ratio has no significant effect on Return on Assets, with a calculated t value of 1.409 smaller than the t table of 2.365 and a significance value of 0.199 which is greater than 0.05. This finding indicates that the company's liquidity level has not been able to directly increase profitability. Furthermore, the Debt to Equity Ratio is also proven to have no significant effect on Return on Assets. This is indicated by a calculated t value of -2.299 which is smaller than the t table of 2.365 and a significance value of 0.055, still above the 0.05 limit. Thus, the company's capital structure through DER does not have a significant partial contribution to ROA.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Profitability, Liquidity, Leverage, Opinion Shopping, and Public Accounting Firm (KAP) Size on Going Concern Audit Opinion in property and real estate sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020–2024 period. The audit opinion going concern is an important issue because it reflects the company's ability to maintain its business continuity in the midst of economic uncertainty and increasingly complex market dynamics. The research population includes all companies in the property and real estate sectors on the IDX, with sample selection using purposive sampling techniques that resulted in 60 companies as the object of the study. The collected data was analyzed using the logistic regression method to test the influence of each independent variable on the audit opinion going concern. The results of the study show that profitability has a negative and significant effect on the audit opinion of going concern, which means that the higher the level of profitability of the company, the less likely the auditor to give an audit opinion of going concern. Furthermore, Opinion Shopping has been proven to have a positive and significant effect on going concern audit opinions, so that the practice of seeking alternative auditor opinions has the potential to increase the risk of issuing going concern opinions. Meanwhile, the variables Liquidity, Leverage, and KAP Size did not show a significant influence on the audit opinion going concern. These findings confirm that certain financial performance factors as well as management behavior in seeking auditor opinions have an important role in determining audit opinion going concern, while other factors such as the size of the KAP are not necessarily determinative.

This study aims to examine the effect of liquidity, profitability, leverage, and accounts receivable turnover on financial distress. The sample used in this study is banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2021-2024 period. The population sample in this study is 47 companies. The sample was determined using a purposive sampling method, resulting in 10 companies. The type of data for this study is secondary data obtained from www.idx.co.id. The analytical method used was multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that simultaneously, the variables liquidity, profitability, leverage, and accounts receivable turnover significantly influence financial distress. Partially, the liquidity variable has a negative and significant effect on financial distress, while the profitability variable has a negative and significant effect on financial distress. Leverage and accounts receivable turnover have no effect on financial distress. Furthermore, the Adjusted R-square coefficient is 95.3%, indicating that 4.7% is influenced by other variables. These findings suggest that companies with better liquidity and profitability levels have a lower probability of experiencing financial distress. This aligns with the theory that high liquidity ensures the availability of cash to meet short-term obligations, while strong profitability supports operational sustainability and investor confidence. On the other hand, leverage and accounts receivable turnover did not significantly affect financial distress, which may indicate that banking companies have a more stable debt structure and effective credit management, reducing their influence on distress conditions. This research provides practical insights for company management, investors, and regulators. For managers, maintaining optimal liquidity and profitability levels is essential to prevent financial difficulties. For investors, liquidity and profitability indicators can serve as reliable references for investment decision-making.

Banking is a key pillar of the financial system, playing a crucial role as an intermediary between those with excess funds and those in need of financing. In the context of post-pandemic economic recovery in the 2022–2024 period, bank sustainability and resilience, particularly in terms of profit-generating ability, are crucial aspects to consider. This study was conducted to analyze the extent to which capital structure and intermediation efficiency influence the profitability of banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Capital structure in this study is proxied by the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), while intermediation efficiency is measured by the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR). The profitability indicator used is Return on Assets (ROA), which reflects a bank's effectiveness in utilizing its assets to generate profits. This research methodology uses a quantitative approach through multiple linear regression analysis with secondary data in the form of annual financial reports from 111 banks for the 2022–2024 period. The analysis results show that simultaneously, CAR and LDR variables have a significant effect on ROA. Furthermore, both variables have been shown to contribute positively to increasing bank profitability. In other words, maintaining adequate capital and efficient credit management can strengthen overall financial performance. This finding offers strategic implications for bank management in formulating capital and liquidity management policies. Optimizing these two aspects not only impacts short-term profit achievement but also contributes to the stability and sustainability of banking profitability in the long term. Therefore, banks need to ensure a strong capital strategy coupled with efficient intermediation to be more resilient in facing future economic dynamics.

This study aims to analyze the influence of capital structure, liquidity, sales growth, and green accounting, assessed through environmental performance and environmental costs, on the profitability of companies. The research focuses on the food and beverage sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2020–2024 period, which represents one of the most dynamic and environmentally impactful industries in Indonesia. The sample consists of 30 companies selected using a purposive sampling technique based on predetermined criteria, ensuring the representativeness and relevance of the data analyzed. The study employs multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 22.0 to test the hypotheses and measure the extent to which the independent variables contribute to profitability as the dependent variable. The findings reveal that liquidity and sales growth exert a positive and significant influence on profitability, indicating that firms with higher liquidity levels and stronger sales growth are better positioned to enhance their financial performance. In contrast, capital structure demonstrates a negative and significant effect, suggesting that higher levels of debt reduce profitability due to increased financial burdens. Similarly, green accounting, when assessed through environmental performance, also shows a negative and significant impact, implying that companies focusing on environmental initiatives may face higher costs that suppress short-term profitability. However, green accounting as measured by environmental costs does not show any significant effect on profitability, highlighting that disclosure or allocation of environmental costs alone may not directly translate into financial outcomes. Overall, the study concludes that capital structure, liquidity, sales growth, and green accounting—when measured through both environmental performance and costs—jointly influence the profitability of food and beverage companies on the IDX during the observed period.

This study the analyze the influence of financial performance as a predictor of stock price in the property and real estate sector listed on the IDX for the 2020-2024 period, using a sample consists of 12 property companies. The financial performance variables used in this study include ROE, EPS, CR, and TATO. The result of show that simultaneously,all four variables have a significant  effect on stock prices. Partially, only ROE, EPS, and TATO have a significant impact, while CR has no significant effect. The analysis methods include descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, and F Satatistical tests. The findings confirm that profitability, particularly (ROE and EPS) and asset efficiency (TATO), are the factors consideres  by investors when evaluating stocks in the property sector.  The analysis methods used in this study include descriptive statistics to summarize the data, classical assumption tests to ensure the validity of the regression model, multiple linear regression to examine the relationship between the financial performance variables and stock prices, and F-statistical tests to evaluate the overall significance of the model. The findings suggest that profitability, particularly ROE and EPS, and asset efficiency, represented by TATO, are the key factors considered by investors when evaluating stocks in the property sector.These results imply that investors in the property and real estate sector prioritize financial performance metrics that reflect the company's ability to generate returns and utilize its assets effectively. Specifically, ROE and EPS serve as crucial indicators of profitability and are closely monitored by market participants. On the other hand, CR, which measures the company's short-term liquidity, does not appear to have the same level of influence on stock prices.  

This study aims to evaluate the financial condition of four private banks, namely Bank Mega, Bank JTrust, Bank Danamon, and Bank Panin listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2015 to 2024. The analysis uses the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) approach with a quantitative method, where the data source is derived from published annual financial statements. The sampling technique was carried out by purposive sampling with the criteria of financial statements available for the last 10 years and the fluctuations in profits in the last three years. The bank's health assessment is carried out through four main aspects. First, the risk profile is measured using non-performing loan (NPL) ratios and liquidity levels through the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR). Second, Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is evaluated based on regulatory compliance and transparency reporting. Third, profitability which includes the return on asset ratio (ROA) and net interest margin (Net Interest Margin / NIM). Fourth, the capital aspect is analyzed through the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of the study show that in general, the four banks are in a healthy condition, especially in terms of capital and governance, which reflects the bank's ability to meet the minimum capital requirements and maintain management practices in accordance with banking industry standards. However, significant differences were found in the risk and profitability aspects. Banks that have less than optimal risk management tend to experience an increase in NPLs, while banks that are more efficient in managing operational costs are able to maintain ROA and NIM at a more stable level. In addition, external factors such as global economic conditions, monetary policy, interest rates, and interbank competition also affect financial performance.

This study aims to analyze the effect of liquidity and credit risk on the profitability of banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2018–2022. Profitability is measured by Return on Assets (ROA), liquidity is proxied by the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), while credit risk is measured using the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio. The research employs a quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis to test the partial and simultaneous influence of the independent variables on profitability. Data were obtained from the annual financial reports of banks published on the IDX, covering a five-year observation period. The results of the analysis show that credit risk, as measured by NPL, has a significant negative effect on bank profitability. This finding reflects that the higher the NPL ratio, the lower the bank’s ability to generate returns on assets, emphasizing the importance of effective credit quality management. In contrast, the liquidity level measured by LDR demonstrates a positive but statistically insignificant effect on ROA. This suggests that although liquidity plays a role in supporting banking operations, its direct impact on profitability is relatively weak when considered independently. However, when examined simultaneously, both credit risk and liquidity significantly affect bank profitability. These findings imply that effective credit risk management is a crucial determinant of financial performance in the banking sector. High levels of non-performing loans can erode bank profits, while optimal liquidity management supports operational efficiency, even if its impact is not strongly significant in isolation. From a managerial perspective, banks need to strengthen monitoring of loan quality, implement more prudent credit policies, and adopt sustainable liquidity strategies to enhance profitability. For regulators, the results highlight the importance of supervising asset quality and ensuring adequate liquidity management in the banking system. This study contributes to the literature on banking performance by providing empirical evidence on the interaction between credit risk, liquidity, and profitability in the Indonesian banking sector.

This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of fundamental factors represented by the current ratio, return on equity, and debt-to-equity ratio, as well as trading volume and market value added variables on the stock prices of industrial sector companies listed on the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index (ISSI) during the 2020–2024 period. This study uses a quantitative approach with secondary data obtained from published financial reports and stock market data. The study population includes all industrial sector companies listed on the ISSI, while the sampling technique used is purposive sampling with certain criteria, resulting in 12 companies as research samples with an observation period of five years. The data analysis method used is panel data regression with the help of Eviews 13 software. The results show that partially the current ratio, debt-to-equity ratio, and trading volume have a significant effect on stock prices, indicating that the level of liquidity, capital structure, and trading activity play an important role in determining stock value in the market. Conversely, return on equity and market value added do not have a significant effect on stock prices, indicating that equity-based profitability and market value added are not always the main considerations for investors in this sector. Simultaneously, the current ratio, return on equity, debt to equity ratio, trading volume, and market value added have a significant effect on stock prices, which means that a combination of fundamental factors, market activity, and investor assessments can collectively influence stock price movements of industrial sector companies in the ISSI.  

This study aims to analyze and examine the influence of company size, profitability, and liquidity on going-concern audit opinions in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Going-concern audit opinions are important indicators provided by auditors to assess the company's future business continuity. Factors such as company size, profitability, and liquidity are often associated with the auditor's likelihood of issuing such an opinion. The research method used is a quantitative method with an associative approach. The types and sources of data used in this study are secondary data in the form of annual financial reports of companies listed on the IDX during the 2019–2023 period. Sampling was carried out using a purposive sampling method, namely determining samples based on certain criteria relevant to the research objectives. From this process, 375 observational data samples were obtained. Data processing and analysis were carried out using IBM SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) version 27 software, which allows for accurate and measurable statistical testing. The results of the study indicate that company size does not affect going-concern audit opinions, so the size of the company's assets is not a determining factor for auditors in issuing such an opinion. Meanwhile, profitability was shown to have a significant influence on going-concern audit opinions, with companies with higher profitability tending to receive unmodified going-concern audit opinions. Conversely, liquidity had no effect on going-concern audit opinions, indicating that the ability to meet short-term obligations is not always a primary consideration for auditors. These findings are expected to contribute to company management, auditors, and investors' understanding of the factors influencing going-concern audit opinions.  

The study aims to explain the concept of evaluating the efficiency of financial and economic performance in government commercial banks, specifically focusing on Rasheed Bank’s Al-Numaniyah Branch, for the period 2015-2023. The study highlights the importance of using specific criteria or indicators to assess the financial and economic performance of the bank, particularly its efficiency in managing assets and liabilities. The research identifies key financial ratios such as the trading ratio, which increased to 2:1 in 2023 compared to 1:2 in 2020. This increase indicates that the current assets are now twice the value of current liabilities, offering security to the bank’s stakeholders and creditors. This improved ratio is a significant sign of financial stability and effective asset management, offering valuable insights into the bank's financial health. The research also emphasizes the necessity of evaluating the management of current assets and liabilities. It recommends that the bank focus on optimizing the use of its current assets while harmonizing the sources of its funds to maximize profitability. Additionally, it is crucial to manage the liquidity ratio effectively, balancing the need for financial security with the risks involved in liquidity management. This study suggests that the bank should implement strategies to enhance the profitability of its assets, ensuring that investment decisions align with long-term economic and financial goals. In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of strategic financial management, including a comprehensive evaluation of both financial and economic performance, to ensure the bank's sustainability, profitability, and growth in the ever-evolving banking landscape, fostering long-term financial stability and success.

The purpose of this study is to assess the financial performance of PT Mayora Indah Tbk. through an analysis of profitability and liquidity ratios over the past five years. A company's financial performance is a key indicator in evaluating operational success, managerial efficiency, and overall financial health. This assessment is important for investors, management, and other stakeholders in strategic decision-making. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach with a case study as its primary method. The data analyzed are secondary data in the form of PT Mayora Indah Tbk.'s annual financial reports published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The ratios analyzed include Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Net Profit Margin (NPM) as profitability indicators, and Current Ratio (CR), Quick Ratio (QR), and Cash Ratio as liquidity indicators. The results of the study indicate that in general, the company is able to maintain a stable level of profitability, despite minor fluctuations from year to year. ROA and ROE indicate that management is quite effective in managing assets and equity to generate profits. NPM also shows a competitive net profit margin compared to similar industries. Meanwhile, the liquidity ratio indicates that PT Mayora Indah Tbk. has a strong and consistent ability to meet its short-term obligations. The CR, QR, and Cash Ratio are all within safe limits, indicating healthy liquidity. In conclusion, PT Mayora Indah Tbk. demonstrates good financial performance in terms of both profitability and liquidity, making it a company worthy of consideration for long-term investment.

Based on the financial performance analysis of PT. Gudang Garam Tbk (GGRM) during the 2020–2023 period, the company faced significant challenges that impacted its financial condition. One of the main factors affecting the company's performance is the increase in tobacco excise duties, which has affected the cost structure and selling prices of its cigarette products. Additionally, the increasing regulatory pressure and changes in consumer behavior have posed unavoidable challenges. The decline in profitability and liquidity ratios, such as Return on Assets (ROA) and Current Ratio (CR), indicates the negative impact of these external conditions on the company’s ability to generate profit and meet short-term obligations. This decline suggests that the company is struggling to balance income and operational costs. The fluctuating solvency ratio also raises concern. Although the company manages to maintain a balance between debt and equity, these fluctuations show challenges in managing long-term assets and liabilities. Dependence on debt and rising operational costs pose risks to the company's financial stability. These fluctuations affect the company's ability to maintain liquidity and solvency in an increasingly competitive market. Trend analysis from the financial statements indicates that the company needs to strengthen its adaptation strategies and risk management to face the growing market challenges. GGRM must focus on product innovation and marketing strategies that can attract new customers while retaining existing ones. Furthermore, the company must adapt to changing regulations and evolving consumer trends. The results of this study provide important insights for stakeholders regarding the financial condition of the tobacco industry. In this challenging situation, GGRM must continue to develop more adaptive strategies to survive and thrive amidst the dynamic market and increasingly stringent regulations.

The food and beverage manufacturing industry in Indonesia continues to show stable growth despite facing post-pandemic economic challenges. However, company values in this sector have fluctuated, indicating the influence of internal company factors. This study aims to analyze the direct and indirect effects of liquidity, profitability, and company size on company value, with financial performance as an intervening or mediating variable. This study uses a quantitative approach with causality research methods to understand the cause-and-effect relationships between variables. The analytical techniques used include path analysis and the Sobel test to test the mediation effect. The results show that profitability has a significant influence on financial performance and also has a direct positive effect on company value. Meanwhile, financial performance has a significant negative effect on company value. Nevertheless, financial performance has been shown to mediate the relationship between profitability and company value. This finding confirms that profitability is a key factor influencing company value, both directly and through financial performance as a mediating variable. Conversely, liquidity and company size were not found to be dominant factors in influencing company value. The practical implication of this study is the importance of focusing on increasing profitability as a primary strategy in corporate financial planning. For investors, these results can also be a consideration in evaluating the health and prospects of a company in making investment decisions.

This study aims to examine the influence of financial performance ratios—namely, the liquidity ratio (Current Ratio/CR), solvency ratio (Debt to Asset Ratio/DAR), and activity ratio (Total Asset Turnover/TATO)—on the return on assets (ROA) of companies in the automotive sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2020–2023. Employing a quantitative research approach with purposive sampling, the study focuses on automotive sector companies that met specific criteria over the observed time span. Data analysis was conducted using EViews version 13 software, and the methodology included descriptive statistics, panel data estimation, classical assumption tests, panel data regression analysis, t-tests (for partial effects), F-tests (for simultaneous effects), and coefficient of determination (R²) tests. The partial test results reveal that the liquidity ratio (CR) has a negative but statistically insignificant effect on ROA, indicating that higher liquidity does not necessarily enhance profitability. Similarly, the solvency ratio (DAR) demonstrates a negative and insignificant effect on ROA, suggesting that increased debt levels are not significantly associated with lower returns. In contrast, the activity ratio (TATO) has a positive and significant effect on ROA, implying that better asset utilization contributes positively to profitability. When tested simultaneously, the combination of CR, DAR, and TATO shows a positive and significant influence on ROA, indicating that these financial ratios collectively impact the profitability of automotive companies. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how internal financial indicators relate to profitability in the automotive sector and can inform management decisions and investor evaluations.

This study aims to analyze and determine whether or not there are differences in financial performance between cigarette sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016 - 2023. This type of research uses quantitative research with a comparative method. Sampling was carried out using the purposive sampling method and four companies were obtained. The data used in this study are secondary data using the company's annual financial reports. Hypothesis testing was carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data and the One-Way ANOVA test for normally distributed data. The results of the study indicate that there are significant differences between the financial performance of PT HM Sampoerna Tbk, PT Gudang Garam Tbk, PT Wismilak Inti Makmur Tbk, and PT Indonesian Tobacco Tbk as seen from the liquidity ratio (Current Ratio), solvency ratio (Debt To Asset Ratio), activity ratio (Total Asset Turn Over), and profitability ratio (Return On Asset).

This study aims to analyze the effect of firm size, profitability, and liquidity on firm value in the transportation and logistics sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2020–2023. This study uses a quantitative approach with secondary data obtained from annual financial reports. The sample was selected through purposive sampling and resulted in 11 companies over 4 years, totaling 44 observations. Panel data regression analysis was performed using STATA-14. The results show that partially, firm size and liquidity do not significantly affect firm value, while profitability has a significant positive effect. Simultaneously, all three variables significantly affect firm value. This finding implies that profitability is a main concern for investors when assessing firm value.

This study aims to analyze the comparison of financial performance based on the liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios of animal feed sub-sector companies listed on the IDX in 2018-2023. This study uses comparative research and is included in quantitative research. The sampling technique was carried out using the Purposive Sampling technique. The results of this study indicate a significant difference in the financial performance of animal feed sub-sector companies listed on the IDX with stock codes CPIN, CPRO, JPFA, MAIN, and SIPD based on the liquidity ratio (CR), solvency (DER), and profitability (ROA). The results of this study are expected to provide a reference for related companies to improve their respective financial performance, especially for those whose values ​​are below or above the industry average and can be used as a consideration for prospective investors.

Using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of financial performance on the stock prices of food and beverage manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2020 to 2024. The financial performance factors analyzed include Return on Assets (ROA), Current Ratio (CR), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), and Return on Investment (ROI). Data were collected from fifteen nationally accredited scientific articles published during the period and were eligible for inclusion. The results show that Return on Assets (ROA) consistently has a positive effect on stock prices, making it the most important indicator to attract investors. Since investors prioritize profitability over short-term liquidity, Current Ratio (CR) is usually not very influential. Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) results vary depending on the debt condition of companies and their financial plans. However, Return on Investment (ROI), which has not been studied much, seems to have a significant impact on stock prices and is starting to attract the attention of investors in the food and beverage industry. This study helps by providing a comprehensive picture of the pattern of influence of financial ratios on stock prices and complements the shortcomings of current research, especially regarding the ROI variable which is still minimal in previous studies. It is hoped that these findings will help investors, company management, academics, and regulators make decisions and create investment strategies in the Indonesian capital market.

This study aims to confirm the effect of liquidity and profitability performance on the performance of the company’s value in the cement sector company in Indonesia. The data used in this study are secondary data with panel data types that combine time series and cross section data from annual reports. The population and samples of research are sub-sector companies registered on ISSI or the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index for annual report pulished consistently for the 2013 period -2022. A number of 5 companies on the ISSI for a period of  10 years so that the number of samples used is 50 samples. The analysis method used is quantitative with panel data regression analysis. The research results show that liquidity performance has a partial influence on company value with a significance level of 0.018. Meanwhile, partial profitability performance does not have an influence of 0.6104 on company value. Meanwhile, simultaneously, the current ratio liquidity and ROA profitability variables have no effect on company value with a significance level of 0.2838.