Publication Search

Business entities often face bankruptcy risks due to various factors, including accounting errors, limited experience, or small-cap transactions. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated financial conditions for many companies, such as PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk., which experienced a significant revenue decline. Additionally, individuals may face bankruptcy due to reasons like job termination or business failures. The primary cause of bankruptcy lies in the imbalance between debt and income, often worsened by poor financial planning. Government regulations can help mitigate bankruptcy risks, such as through health insurance and credit restrictions. The bankruptcy process aims to provide fair resolutions between debtors and creditors while safeguarding public interests. Bankruptcy can also offer debtors the opportunity to restructure their debt, maintain economic stability, and prevent social loss. In practice, bankruptcy involves the management of the debtor's assets by a trustee and the proportional distribution of proceeds to creditors. The application of freedom of contract and legal certainty principles in debtor-creditor relationships is crucial to ensuring a transparent, efficient, and equitable process.

This article explores the strategic role of bilateral diplomacy between Indonesia and the Philippines in strengthening ASEAN unity amidst regional political challenges. Using a qualitative research approach with descriptive analysis, it examines how diplomatic cooperation on security, conflict resolution, and economic collaboration has contributed to regional stability and integration. The study highlights Indonesia's role in mediating internal conflicts in the Philippines and joint efforts in maritime security. Despite geopolitical tensions and domestic political changes, the bilateral relationship remains crucial for ASEAN's resilience and cohesion. The findings emphasize the importance of sustained diplomatic engagement for fostering regional solidarity and addressing emerging global challenges.

With the rise in human migration across national boundaries in the age of globalization, the issue of dual citizenship has become more and more important. Dual citizenship brings up a number of issues in the context of international law about legal status, diplomatic protection, and allegiance to both the nation of origin and the nation of residence. Increased cross-border social interactions that push people to hold several citizenships, technological improvements, and increased global economic integration have all complicated this dynamic. As a nation that upholds the idea of a single citizenship, Indonesia has trouble aligning its national laws with the shifting global legal framework, which governs things like dual citizenship, migration, and statelessness. is often more accepting of the practice of dual citizenship. From an international law standpoint, this research seeks to examine the subject of dual citizenship and its consequences for Indonesia's citizenship legislation and legal system. With a juridical-comparative examination of international legal instruments, scholarly publications, and applicable national legislation, the study uses a normative methodology. The results show that Indonesia's single citizenship concept conflicts with the worldwide trend that prioritizes human rights, diverse identities, and diaspora protection. Indonesia, according to the research, should think about changing its citizenship laws to take into account global concerns while still protecting its sovereignty, national stability, and core national values.

The amendment of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia is a crucial legal and political mechanism within the dynamics of constitutional law. An amendment is understood as an adjustment of constitutional norms to remain relevant with changing times while preserving the state’s fundamental identity. Unlike a constitutional replacement, which is comprehensive and signifies the birth of a new constitutional order, amendments are partial and limited. Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution sets out strict procedures, including requirements for proposal, quorum, and substantive limitations that cannot be altered, namely the form of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This mechanism prevents arbitrary changes and safeguards legal and political stability. The 1999–2002 amendments demonstrate that the Constitution can be improved without disrupting national continuity. Therefore, amendments are viewed as an evolutionary form of constitutional reform, while replacement signifies radical change. This analysis highlights that the amendment procedure of the 1945 Constitution is designed to balance the need for flexibility with constitutional stability in Indonesia.

The agricultural sector plays a crucial role in supporting the livelihoods and economic stability of Indonesian society, particularly within the Pademawu community. Indonesia’s vast agrarian landscape and strong reliance on agriculture have shaped various local traditions and cooperative systems among farmers. One such system is the muzara’ah agreement, a form of agricultural profit-sharing partnership between landowners and cultivators. This research focuses on the implementation of the Paron La’as agreement, a traditional form of muzara’ah practiced by the Pademawu community, which reflects both economic cooperation and Islamic legal principles. The study employs a qualitative approach using a field research design to collect descriptive data through interviews, observation, and documentation. The findings reveal that the Paron La’as system is conducted in accordance with the principles of Islamic law governing muzara’ah contracts, particularly in terms of fairness, mutual consent, and proportional profit distribution between landowners and farmers. Moreover, the study highlights how this cooperative practice not only strengthens economic ties within the community but also preserves local wisdom and social harmony. Therefore, the Paron La’as model demonstrates an effective integration of Islamic economic values with traditional agricultural systems, serving as a sustainable example of community-based agricultural cooperation in Indonesia.

This research aims to analyze the relevance of applying restorative justice in resolving counterfeiting cases committed by children, by examining the normative, juridical, and practical aspects within Indonesia’s juvenile criminal justice system. The background of this study arises from the dilemma between protecting the rights of children as offenders and the state’s obligation to maintain economic stability and public trust in the national currency. The research method employed is juridical-descriptive with a normative approach,. The implementation of restorative justice can still safeguard public interests, provided it involves relevant institutions such as Bank Indonesia and produces measurable recovery agreements. Thus, restorative justice serves as an alternative approach that balances child protection and legal certainty, while also contributing to the prevention of counterfeit money circulation in society.

Cigarette excise crimes are a form of economic crime that significantly impact state revenues, national economic stability, and the market balance of the tobacco industry. This phenomenon not only causes material losses to the state but also has implications for social justice and the economic order of society. This study aims to analyze in depth the characteristics, causes, and implications of cigarette excise crimes from the perspective of economic criminal law and criminology. The research method used is a juridical-normative approach combined with criminological analysis to identify the relationship between social, economic, and legal factors in cigarette excise violations. The results indicate that these crimes are driven by economic motives, regulatory imbalances, weak law enforcement, and low public awareness of excise obligations. Through this analysis, the study emphasizes the need for synergy between criminal law policy, economic oversight, and a criminological approach to create an effective and equitable excise control system in Indonesia.

This research aims to analyze the conflict of authority between the Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) and the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung) within Indonesia’s constitutional system, focusing on institutional disputes that have emerged following the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. The main objective is to examine the legal foundations, juridical implications, and mechanisms for resolving jurisdictional conflicts between the two courts through a normative juridical approach and case-based analysis. The findings indicate that authority conflicts between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court often arise from overlapping legal norms and ambiguities in the delineation of constitutional functions established by the 1945 Constitution and its implementing laws. In several cases, such as disputes over the judicial review of regulations below the level of statutes, divergent interpretations have occurred regarding the scope of constitutional versus administrative jurisdiction. This study reveals that legal harmonization through regulatory reform and inter-institutional coordination is essential to prevent future jurisdictional overlaps. The conclusion emphasizes the need to strengthen the principles of checks and balances and clarify the hierarchy of norms to ensure stability in Indonesia’s constitutional framework. The research recommends the establishment of a cross-institutional constitutional forum as a mediation mechanism among state institutions to uphold constitutional supremacy and legal certainty in Indonesia.

This study examines the evolution of the notary supervision system in Indonesia, particularly the impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 which revoked Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 and the establishment of the Notary Honorary Council (MKN) through Law No. 2 of 2014. The study uses a normative juridical method with a case and statutory approach, supported by literature analysis and expert opinion. The results show that the Constitutional Court decision eliminated legal protection for notaries in facing arbitrary actions by law enforcement officers, creating inequality with other professions such as advocates and doctors. Although the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) still exists institutionally, the authority to grant approval for summoning notaries has been lost. In response, the government established the MKN which combines elements of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights with the Indonesian Notaries Association. International comparisons show that the civil law system provides stronger protection through specialized courts, while common law does not provide a privileged position for notaries. Indonesia adopts a mixed model that provides flexibility but creates coordination complexity. The MKN plays a role in enforcing professional ethics while maintaining a balance between the protection of notaries as public officials who make authentic deeds and accountability in the judicial system, restoring the stability of legal protection that was lost after the Constitutional Court's decision.

Regulatory changes through Law No. 3 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 6 of 2014 stipulate an extension of the village head's term of office from six to eight years. This policy is intended to strengthen leadership stability and the sustainability of village development, but also raises concerns regarding reduced leadership circulation, weakened community political participation, and increased potential for abuse of power. This research uses empirical legal methods with sociological, conceptual, and case-based approaches, conducted through field observations and in-depth interviews with village officials, community leaders, MSMEs, and residents of Kerato Village. The results show a diverse response from the community. Some support this policy because it is seen as providing the village head with the opportunity to complete development programs sustainably. However, others reject it, arguing that term extension has the potential to reduce the quality of local democracy, limit leadership regeneration, and reduce the frequency of community political participation. The discussion emphasizes the dilemma between village government stability and the principles of participatory democracy. In conclusion, this policy is ambivalent: positive in maintaining development continuity, but risky for accountability and community participation. Therefore, strengthening the function of the Village Consultative Body (BPD), transparency, and effective oversight mechanisms are very necessary to maintain the balance between government stability and village democracy.

Corporate corruption poses a significant threat to economic stability and public trust. Traditional punitive sanctions, such as substantial fines or dissolution, often fail to achieve restorative justice and can lead to unintended consequences, including harm to innocent employees and stakeholders. This paper explores the imperative of developing alternative sanctions for corporations implicated in corruption cases, with a central focus on establishing a framework grounded in fairness. Through a normative juridical research method employing statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the limitations of the current punitive paradigm. It examines various alternative sanctions, including Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs), Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs), corporate monitorship, and mandatory compliance program overhauls. The findings indicate that these alternatives offer a more flexible and effective mechanism for balancing accountability with corporate rehabilitation. They create opportunities to incentivize self-reporting, cooperation, and genuine internal reform. This paper concludes that by integrating principles of proportionality, restorative justice, and forward-looking prevention into the legal framework, a fairer and more effective corporate sanctioning system can be developed. Such a system would not only penalize misconduct but also foster a culture of corporate integrity and contribute more effectively to the broader fight against corruption.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Indonesia’s National Cyber Security Strategy in responding to increasingly complex and dynamic digital threats. In the midst of the digital transformation era, Indonesia’s cyberspace is vulnerable to various serious threats, such as ransomware attacks, data leaks, and the spread of disinformation that can disrupt social and political stability. This research adopts a qualitative- descriptive approach with content analysis of national strategic documents, reports from the National Cyber and Crypto Agency (BSSN), and compares them with cybersecurity policies in ASEAN countries. The results revealed that although BSSN has designed a relatively robust policy and institutional framework, its implementation is still faced with various serious obstacles, including fragmented regulations, lack of coordination between agencies, and limitations in terms of human resources. This study uses Dunn’s (2023) policy evaluation framework, covering the dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency, responsiveness, equity and sustainability. The study recommends the need to strengthen governance involving various sectors, increase awareness and cyber literacy among the public, and develop national capacity through public private partnership. This evaluation is expected to serve as a basis for policy formulation to strengthen Indonesia’s digital resilience, especially in the face of the increasing complexity of cyber threats at the national level.

The Community Service Program (KKN) was implemented with the aim of improving service and security at the Class IIB Tebing Tinggi Correctional Institution (Lapas) through a simple yet functional innovation in the form of a two-function suggestion box. This suggestion box was designed with two separate channels to accommodate aspirations from two separate sections, namely Bimbingan Narapidana/Anak Didik and Security, to facilitate the delivery of input in a safe, structured, and confidential manner. The implementation method of the activity included initial observation, identification of needs, design and construction of the box, and the socialization stage of its use. The results of this activity showed an increase in inmate participation in providing constructive suggestions and the creation of a more open communication channel without disrupting security stability. This innovation is one form of real contribution of cadets in supporting bureaucratic reform and more humane guidance in the correctional environment.

Narcotics are substances or drugs, whether synthetic or semi-synthetic, derived from plants or non-plant materials that have the potential to cause disturbances or changes in human consciousness. Their use may result in loss of sensation, impaired taste, and, in more severe cases, strong dependency or addiction. While narcotics have undeniable benefits in the fields of medicine, healthcare, and scientific development—particularly in pain management and research—their misuse carries significant risks for both individuals and society. This study adopts a normative legal approach by analyzing existing regulations, statutory provisions, and relevant academic literature regarding narcotics and crime. The findings reveal that narcotics abuse is often closely linked to criminal behavior, as drug dependence can negatively influence psychological stability, decision-making, and social conduct, potentially driving individuals to engage in unlawful acts. Furthermore, crime is a relative concept shaped by context, culture, and societal norms, which means its connection with narcotics requires multidimensional analysis. Law enforcement efforts against narcotics-related crimes have been continuously pursued by authorities through preventive, repressive, and judicial measures, with various court rulings highlighting the gravity of the problem. However, legal enforcement alone is insufficient; a holistic strategy is needed that combines strict law enforcement with rehabilitation, psychological support, and community education. Such a comprehensive approach is expected to reduce narcotics misuse, prevent recidivism, and minimize its destructive impacts. Ultimately, this research seeks to provide deeper insights into the dynamic relationship between narcotics abuse and crime, while offering practical recommendations to achieve more effective solutions for protecting individuals, strengthening social resilience, and promoting public welfare

This study examines the institutional discourse and administrative practices of the Secretariat of the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD) in the newly established province of Southwest Papua, Indonesia. Utilizing a qualitative content analysis approach, the research analyzes a corpus of official documents produced between 2022 and 2025, with particular attention to how the principles of good governance—transparency, accountability, participation, and effectiveness—are reflected and operationalized in a transitional bureaucratic setting. The findings reveal that while procedural transparency and organizational effectiveness are relatively well-articulated in formal documents, mechanisms for accountability and citizen participation remain underdeveloped and largely symbolic. This indicates that the new administrative structures are still in the process of consolidating practices that meaningfully incorporate civic engagement. The study further identifies significant patterns of institutional isomorphism, wherein bureaucratic templates, legal frameworks, and administrative routines from older provincial governments are mimicked and reproduced. Although such imitation provides a sense of stability and legitimacy, it may come at the expense of local relevance and the incorporation of context-specific innovations. In particular, reliance on inherited bureaucratic models risks marginalizing indigenous governance traditions and community-driven practices that could enhance inclusivity and responsiveness. The analysis underscores the performative and symbolic dimensions of governance during periods of institutional formation, highlighting the tension between adopting established administrative norms and fostering context-sensitive practices tailored to the realities of frontier provinces. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the value of document analysis in capturing governance dynamics where field access is limited, politically sensitive, or constrained by security issues. The study concludes by offering practical recommendations: strengthening participatory frameworks to ensure more substantive public involvement, integrating indigenous governance values to enhance legitimacy, and designing flexible policy models that can adapt to the unique sociopolitical challenges of Southwest Papua. In doing so, the research contributes both to the broader scholarship on governance in post-conflict and frontier regions and to the practical debates on institutional development in Indonesia’s newest province.

This study discusses the communication strategy implemented by the Karanganyar Police Public Relations Department in delivering an anti-hoax campaign during the 2024 Regional Head Election (Pilkada) through the Instagram platform. The background of this study departs from the phenomenon of the rampant spread of false information ahead of the election, which has the potential to trigger disinformation, polarization, and disrupt social order and stability. Hoaxes during political periods can erode public trust in state institutions, so strategic efforts are needed to address this through effective public communication. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the digital communication strategy used by the Karanganyar Police Public Relations Department in increasing public literacy, encouraging public participation, and maintaining the quality and stability of information circulating in the digital space. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with Public Relations personnel, direct observation of campaign activities on Instagram, and documentation of published content. The strategy analysis refers to the Cutlip, Center, and Broom model which includes four stages: fact-collecting, planning, implementing communication actions, and evaluation. The results show that the use of Instagram was chosen because of its ability to reach a young audience, the flexibility of content formats, and opportunities for two-way interaction. The campaign content was dominated by educational materials presented visually through infographics, digital posters, and short videos, ensuring the anti-hoax message was clearly and persuasively conveyed and easily shared by users. Evaluations showed an increase in public engagement, including comments, content sharing, and participation in online discussions, as well as a significant decrease in the number of hoax reports circulating in the Karanganyar region during the campaign period. This study recommends optimizing the use of Instagram features such as live broadcasts, reels, and interactions through polls or quizzes, along with increasing the creativity of the Public Relations team to further enhance the effectiveness of digital public communication in the future.

This study examines the communication strategy employed by the Public Relations Division of Karanganyar Police in delivering an anti-hoax campaign during the 2024 regional election stages through Instagram. The background of this research lies in the widespread dissemination of misinformation leading up to elections, which can disrupt social order. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of digital communication strategies in increasing public literacy and maintaining the stability of public information. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques including interviews, observations, and documentation. The results show that the communication strategy was implemented systematically through the four stages of the Cutlip, Center, and Broom model: fact-finding, planning, action and communication, and evaluation. Instagram was chosen for its ability to reach a younger audience and enable two-way interactions. Educational content presented in visual formats such as infographics and posters proved effective in delivering anti-hoax messages clearly and persuasively. The evaluation showed increased public engagement and a decline in the spread of hoaxes. This study suggests optimizing Instagram features and enhancing the creativity of the PR team to improve the effectiveness of future digital public communication.

Batam City, as an industrial hub in the Riau Islands Province, plays a vital role in the region’s economic growth. However, a surge in inflation can affect investment interest, as investors tend to avoid areas with economic uncertainty. One of the main contributors to inflation in Batam is the food component, which experiences high demand, especially during certain periods such as religious holidays and the arrival of international tourists. Batam, which is not a food-producing area, faces significant challenges in meeting agricultural needs and currently remains dependent on supplies from outside the region. Geographic constraints, such as inefficient logistics, weather disruptions, and institutional weaknesses in the food sector, further aggravate inflation control efforts. In addition, hilly terrain and less fertile land limit the types of crops that can be cultivated, making food price stability critically important. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Low-Cost Market Operation Team Program (Tim Operasi Pasar Murah) in Batam City in 2024. The method used is Sequential Explanatory Design with a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative findings indicate that the average success rate of the program is 85.93%, with a target achievement rate of 90.12% and a satisfaction level of 86.11%. Qualitative results suggest that the policy of conducting low-cost market operations has been appropriate and carried out by authorized institutions, with strong collaboration between the government and the private sector. The program has succeeded in maintaining price stability ahead of the fasting month and Eid al-Fitr, receiving positive responses from the community and demonstrating good internal coordination. In conclusion, the low-cost market operation program in Batam City has been effective in curbing inflation before the fasting month and Eid al-Fitr. However, for comprehensive inflation control, relying solely on this program is insufficient. Additional strategies are needed to ensure sustainable food price stability.

This research is entitled "The Role of Maneleo in Conflict Resolution in East Busalangga Village, Northwest Rote District, Rote Ndao Regency". The main focus of this research is to examine in depth the role of Maneleo, which is the term for the highest tribal chief in the traditional social structure in East Busalangga Village, in resolving conflicts that occur within the community. Each leo or tribe in this village has its own social structure, with the highest layer called mana leo (leo mane), who holds the highest authority in customary decision-making. The purpose of this research is to determine the role of Maneleo in resolving conflicts according to customary law in East Busalangga Village. The research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach, so that it is able to describe the real conditions in the field based on data obtained from interviews, observations, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that Maneleo has a central role in the conflict resolution process. Although the village head, traditional head, and community leaders are involved in the mediation and discussion process, the final decision remains in the hands of Maneleo. Their roles include mediation (compromise), unifying conflicting communities (unifying), and preserving customary and cultural values (adat/budaya). With a deep understanding of customary norms and social conditions, Maneleo are able to resolve conflicts peacefully, maintain harmony, and prevent divisions within the community. This research confirms that Maneleo are not merely symbols of customary leadership, but key figures in maintaining local social and cultural stability. This role also demonstrates that customary-based conflict resolution mechanisms remain highly relevant in rural communities, particularly in the Rote Ndao region.

The role of Mataf (Mamar Guardians) Manufua in Sillu Village, Fatuleu District is a problem that impacts various aspects including customs and governance, legal certainty, and social stability of the local community, as well as mamar ownership. In this context, the role of mataf is very important to ensure comfort for mamar owners. This study was conducted based on the consideration that the role of mataf in Sillu Village has almost disappeared, causing misuse in utilizing natural resources from mamar that are not by their owners. In addition, this study was conducted to build the potential of human resources in Sillu Village in understanding the importance of the role of mataf in maintaining mamar. Based on the description above, the role of mataf in maintaining mamar needs to be studied using empirical legal research. The main problem in this study is how the role of mataf guards mamar Manufua in Sillu Village, Fatuleu District. Data collection techniques used were observation, interviews and literature studies. The results of the study indicate that the role of mataf in maintaining mamar in Sillu Village, Fatuleu District is quite good with the presence of guarding from mataf. Mataf are able to provide information on various events occurring within the mamar area, from harvesting mamar crops, irrigation of mamar fields, security, and collecting scattered mamar crops in one location so that mamar owners can easily identify them when collecting their Manufua mamar crops. The results of this study indicate a positive role or positive outcomes of the mataf's role in safeguarding mamar. Therefore, it is recommended that students, especially university students, or scientists, further study the potential role of mataf in a broader context.