Publication Search

Bankruptcy as a debt settlement mechanism in Indonesia has a significant impact on all debtors' assets, including intellectual property rights such as trademarks. In practice, many companies have licensed trademarks to third parties before being declared bankrupt, resulting in legal uncertainty regarding the validity of the license agreement and protection for the licensee. This study aims to examine the implications of bankruptcy on the validity of trademark licenses and analyze the legal position of licensees according to the Bankruptcy Law. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches, as well as qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the rights to the licensed trademark remain part of the bankruptcy estate and are under the management of the curator. The license agreement can be continued if it benefits the bankruptcy estate, but can be terminated by the curator if it is considered burdensome. The legal position of the licensee is highly dependent on the recording of the agreement at the DJKI and the policy of the curator. The implications of this research emphasize the need for clearer regulations to provide legal certainty and balanced protection for all parties involved in bankruptcy.

Legal politics is used as a basic reference for someone in determining values, determining and developing law. Law is a set of rules which regulate, both in terms of the order of life of the nation and state. The legal product is born democratically through an agreement from representatives of the people who work in the legislature. The political law of regional autonomy implementation according to Law number 23 of 2014. No matter how much autonomy is given to the regions, the final responsibility will remain with the government. The development carried out by the government must of course look at the RTRW, because it is the basic reference for the development project itself. The National Strategic Project (PSN) is a program implemented by the government itself or a business entity that has a strategic nature to provide and produce an equitable development impact in order to provide an increase in community welfare and regional development.

College students are in early adulthood, a critical developmental stage marked by physical, psychosocial, and cognitive changes that can significantly impact dietary behaviors, including fruit and vegetable consumption. Adequate intake of fruits and vegetables is essential for maintaining overall health and reducing the risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, evidence indicates that fruit and vegetable intake among college students often falls below the levels recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). This study aimed to validate a Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (SQ-FFQ) for assessing total fruit and vegetable intake among college students in Surabaya City, Indonesia. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 30 active university students. The SQ-FFQ method produced higher intake estimates compared to the Estimated Food Record. A statistically significant and strong correlation was found between the two methods (p < 0.001, r > 0.7), indicating strong agreement. These findings support the SQ-FFQ as a valid tool for measuring total fruit and vegetable intake in this population.

The dual citizenship policy in Indonesia is a complex issue within national law and has various implications, including from the perspective of Islamic law. Islamic law does not explicitly regulate the concept of citizenship in the modern sense but has principles that can be used to analyze this policy, such as al-wala’ (loyalty), mu’ahadah (agreements), and maqasid al-shariah (the objectives of Islamic law). This study employs a normative juridical method with a conceptual and comparative legal approach to understand how Islamic law can contribute to assessing Indonesia's dual citizenship policy. The findings indicate that although Islamic law does not explicitly prohibit dual citizenship, certain principles must be considered, such as loyalty to the state and justice in legal relations. Therefore, the implementation of the dual citizenship policy in Indonesia should take into account aspects of Islamic law to align with the national legal identity based on Pancasila and the values of justice.

The balance of rights and obligations in contracts is a fundamental basis for creating justice and legal certainty. With effective protection for all parties in the contract, be it in the realm of commerce or other social relations, it is expected to create a conducive legal environment, which in turn encourages social and economic development. The process of drafting contracts in various fields, such as micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), shows the importance of good design to guarantee the rights of each party In this context, it is important to explore how the contract structure can be designed in such a way that both parties can fulfill their rights and obligations fairly, as well as serve as a guideline in resolving disputes that may arise in the future. rights and obligations are basic principles in contract law that aim to create justice, legal certainty, and balanced protection for all parties to the agreement. In the process of contract formation, balance is achieved through the principles of freedom of contract, good faith, and transparent negotiations so that the rights and obligations of both parties are arranged fairly and proportionally.

The principle of proportionality plays an important role in ensuring the balance of rights and obligations between the parties in a reciprocal agreement. In the context of Indonesian contract law, this principle functions as a mechanism to prevent inequality that can harm one of the parties, especially in commercial and complex contracts. As stated by Hernoko (2016), the application of the principle of proportionality in commercial contracts aims to create substantive justice through a balanced exchange of rights and obligations between the parties. This study uses a normative legal approach with a literature study method, which involves an analysis of related laws and regulations and case studies. This approach allows researchers to explore the application of the principle of proportionality in various types of reciprocal agreements, including franchise agreements and construction service contracts. For example, a study by Susanto et al. (2021)1 highlights how the principle of proportionality is applied in construction service contracts to ensure a fair distribution of responsibilities between contractors and clients. The results of the analysis show that consistent application of the principle of proportionality can improve justice in contractual relationships. In franchise agreements, for example, Rahmawan et al. (2020)2 found that the application of this principle helps create a balance between the rights and obligations of franchisors and franchisees, who often have different bargaining positions. Thus, the principle of proportionality functions not only as a legal principle, but also as a practical tool to achieve justice in contractual practices.

This research examines the influence of effective communication on the success of lobbying and negotiation. Lobbying and negotiation, although differing in their approaches (lobbying is one-way persuasive, negotiation is interactive and involves bargaining), both aim to influence decisions or reach agreements. The success of both heavily relies on effective communication, which includes building relationships, understanding the interlocutor, and overcoming communication barriers. Effective communication strategies involve thorough planning, persuasive communication, conflict management, and understanding the context and interests of all parties. Literature studies show that effective communication is a key success factor, building trust, delivering persuasive messages, managing conflicts, building consensus, and understanding the needs of other parties. Persuasive, assertive, and nonverbal communication also play a crucial role in reaching mutually beneficial agreements. In conclusion, effective communication increases the chances of successful lobbying and negotiation.

This thesis examines the legal consequences faced by notaries who refuse to draft credit agreement deeds containing elements of usury, with a focus on Tuban City. The study addresses two main issues: whether a notary can lawfully refuse such a deed, and what legal sanctions may apply if they do. Using a normative legal research approach with case, statutory, and conceptual analyses, the study finds that while the UUJN (Notary Law) does not explicitly permit refusal on religious grounds, it also does not prohibit it if the client can be served by another notary. Refusal based on Islamic principles—specifically the prohibition of usury (riba)—does not warrant sanctions under Article 85 of the UUJN, unless the refusal leads to the client's abandonment. In such cases, administrative sanctions may apply. According to the Notary Code of Ethics, acting outside legal provisions may also result in disciplinary action. The study concludes that current laws do not provide sufficient legal protection for notaries who seek to align their professional duties with religious beliefs. It recommends legal reform to ensure notaries have the right to uphold sharia principles without fear of sanctions, through amendments to the UUJN that consider religious freedom and human rights, while still ensuring client access to legal services.

A signature is a signature that represents a symbol as a result of a statement or a statement, a product whose development has been very rapid, and has become increasingly popular, an information technology and electronics company which is increasingly popular. With that, the Ellektronilk transaction was born and the use of ElleKtronilk's signature process as an aspect human error. So from iltul pelrlul pelnyelsulailan dulnila dilgiltal telrkailt konselp cybelr notary in ellelktronilk transactions. Ilnil research examines the effectiveness of ellelktronilk's signature in the notary cybelr concept meldnulrult prelsfelktilf pelrmeln komilnfo number 11 of 2022 and implements the research meltodel yulrildils normilvel yailtul sulatul development towards hulkulm problems from the perspective of the US implementation of legal regulations that are valid, article 15 paragraph (3) UlUlJN which regulates that notaries There are also other laxities that are regulated in the regulation of regulations. One of them is the ability to sell transactional financial assets carried out through e-Notary (el-Notary) which ultimately results in deeds of ilkrar, waqf and airplane mortgages. Telrbult legal regulations can be taken from UlUl ILTEl as a legal stand to support the implementation of el-Notary in carrying out electronic transactions. The ability to complete an Otelnilk deed as well as to sign it personally as a legal agreement between Common Law and Civil Law Notaries, between Cybelr Notary and Ellelktronilk Notary. The three things that have been developed have resulted in a formalized renewal strategy produced in a complete, reliable, reliable and safe system through a collaborative strategy developed by several companies or companies using the company's technology team. telmul, selkalilguls' harmony and practice in carrying out the position of notary in Ilndonelsila. The resulting conclusion is that Ellektronilk's signature strength in the notary cybelr concept in the Pelrmeln Komilnfo prelsfelktilf number 11 of 2022, still has no strong legal strength.

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the implementation of the mudharabah contract in mudharabah savings products at BPRS HIK Parahyangan. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques in the form of in-depth interviews with the bank and direct observation of the operational process, as well as documentation of relevant secondary data. The main focus of the study is to examine the implementation of the principles of mudharabah and the profit sharing system applied in the savings product. The results of the study indicate that BPRS HIK Parahyangan has implemented the mudharabah contract in accordance with sharia principles. The bank acts as mudharib (fund manager), while the customer acts as shahibul maal (fund owner). The profit sharing system is determined based on an initial agreement and is distributed transparently based on the actual income obtained from fund management. This study is expected to improve the understanding and practitioners of sharia banking regarding the implementation of the mudharabah contract in banking products. In addition, the results of this study also contribute to the development of sharia financial literature and practices in Indonesia.

This study examines the role of Local Strongmen (Fukun) in resolving land conflicts within the salt pond industry in Weoe Village, Wewiku District, Malaka Regency. The research aims to identify, describe, and analyze the role of local strongmen in mediating land disputes in salt pond operations, as well as to identify challenges encountered during the resolution process. The primary focus is on the function of local strongmen or traditional leaders in addressing land conflicts in this industry. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach through field research. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews, and literature review. Data analysis follows a structured process involving data collection, reduction, presentation, and verification leading to conclusion drawing. Findings reveal that local strongmen (Fukun) serve as effective mediators in conflict resolution. Their approach facilitates a settlement process that is simple, efficient, and participatory. However, the study identifies a significant challenge: differing perceptions among stakeholders often hinder the achievement of mutually satisfactory agreements.  

In banking practice, cooperation agreements between banks and developers for providing Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (“KPR”) facilities often incorporate the buy back guarantee scheme as a form of security against the risk of debtor default. This scheme obligates the developer to repurchase the property as collateral in case of a loan default. The buy back guarantee scheme in KPR is essential for banks as a risk mitigation mechanism to ensure the recovery of disbursed funds, reduce the potential for non-performing loans, and provide legal certainty and protection against losses caused by debtor default. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the legal protection available to banks bound by cooperation agreements for the provision of KPR facilities under the buy back guarantee scheme, taking into account the legal position of the banks and developers, as well as examining legal certainty and dispute resolution mechanisms applicable in cases of loan default.

Land purchase transactions in Indonesia, which often involve customary practices and are governed by law, require a written agreement, such as a Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB), to prevent conflicts. The PPJB binds both parties and is subject to civil law. In case of a breach of contract, the agreement may be canceled through the court. A breach of contract accompanied by fraud can result in criminal liability, and the affected party may file a civil lawsuit to annul the transaction. This study aims to (1) examine the legal consequences for the parties following the cancellation of a sale and purchase agreement for land rights by the court due to breach of contract; and (2) explore the legal protection available in the cancellation of such agreements in Indonesia. The research method employs a normative legal approach with a literature review, analyzing relevant laws, theories, and court decisions through primary and secondary legal materials. The analysis is qualitative, linking court decisions to the issues addressed in the study. The findings indicate that, in contract law, particularly in land sales, certain principles and conditions govern the validity of agreements. In the event of a breach of contract, the injured party may seek to annul the agreement in court if subjective (agreement, capacity) or objective (valid object and cause) requirements are not met. Cancellation of the agreement restores the parties to their original positions, allowing for the return of any goods exchanged. A breach of contract, where one party fails to fulfill its obligations, may lead to cancellation and compensation. Contract law provides legal protection to the injured party, including the right to demand performance, annulment, and compensation as outlined in the Civil Code.

This study aims to measure the business performance of CV XYZ through the perspectives of finance, customers, internal business processes, growth and learning of the balanced scorecard method at CV XYZ in 2023. The data used is primary data, in the form of data from interviews with CV XYZ managers or those who have authority over CV XYZ business performance data. The results of the study can be concluded that based on research on the financial perspective, the results of the calculation of current ratio, revenue growth, debt to total assets, debt to equity, return on equity, return on assets and net profit margin get “good” criteria. In the customer perspective, the results of the calculation of customer retention get “sufficient” criteria, while the results of the calculation of customer acquisition and customer complaints get “good” criteria. In the internal business process perspective, the results of the calculation of minimize error rate and rework, and agreements with third parties get the “good” criteria. In the growth and learning perspective, the results of the calculation of employee retention get the criteria “sufficient”, employee training gets the criteria “good” and absenteeism gets the criteria “not good”.

Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, PKPU is an effort to reach an Agreement or Mutual Agreement between the debtor and creditor which is carried out with the intention of submitting a peace plan in the form of an offer of payment of either part or all of the debt that has matured to the creditor regarding the settlement of debts. Furthermore, in the results of the analysis of Decision PKPU Number 188 K/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2013, the Debtor has violated the provisions of Article 222 paragraph (2) of the Law, it is explained that for debtors who have more than one creditor and the debtor does not pay at least one debt that has matured and can be collected, he is declared bankrupt by a court decision, either at the request of the debtor himself or at the request of one or more of his creditors, Legal Implications of Decision No. 08/PKPU/2012/PN.Niaga.Mks Debtor PT.Kopi Jaya Comrpora as the debtor, seeing from the trial facts, the author agrees with the decision of the panel of judges.

Indonesia, which previously traded carbon through a voluntary market mechanism, has switched its carbon trading implementation through a carbon exchange (IDX Carbon) since September 26, 2023. This means that carbon trading in Indonesia is carried out through the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), and all carbon units are traded as securities or securities, whereas previously carbon transactions in Indonesia were voluntary. The implementation of carbon trading is a form of Indonesia's commitment to implementing the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol in reducing Greenhouse Gas emissions by 29% in 2030 with its own capabilities and up to 41% with international support. In the implementation of carbon trading in Indonesia, it is carried out through a mandatory market and the Indonesia Stock Exchange has been appointed as the institution organizing carbon trading, but the regulations that form the basis for the implementation of carbon trading do not clearly regulate how to determine carbon prices, the institution authorized to issue Technical Approval for Upper Emission Limits for Business Actors (PTBAE-PU) and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Certificates as units traded on the Carbon Exchange.

Nominee agreements provide a way for foreigners to own land in Indonesia by using the name of an Indonesian citizen on the land certificate. The Indonesian citizen in the Nominee Agreement dies. The land used as an object in the Nominee Agreement is one of the inheritance assets to the legal heirs. The results showed that the disputed land should have fallen to the state, even though the heirs were legitimate heirs to inherit the property rights to the disputed land.  

This study aims to describe and analyze the role of Bakorwil III as a government organizer in inter-regional cooperation for tourism management in Malang Raya, as well as the obstacles faced by Bakorwil III. The research method used is qualitative descriptive, with data collection techniques including interviews, observations, and documentation. The research informant is the Head of the Coordinating Agency for Region III Malang. The data analysis technique uses the interactive model developed by Miles et al. (2014), which includes data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results show that Bakorwil III Malang, as a representative of the East Java Provincial Government, has the main task of coordinating inter-regional cooperation in tourism management in Malang Raya. Bakorwil III Malang ensures that every stage of the cooperation formation process, from planning to the signing of agreements, is carried out. As a facilitator, Bakorwil III Malang coordinates between the Malang Raya government and other stakeholders. Bakorwil III also facilitates information related to Government Regulation No. 28 of 2018 regarding Regional Cooperation. The obstacles faced by Bakorwil III in carrying out its role include differences in political interests, development disparities, regional characteristic differences, and budget limitations.

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Principles Article 5 states that customary law in the context of land sale and purchase adheres to the principles of clarity and cash payment. Therefore, the drafting of a land sale and purchase deed is not mandatory to require full payment as long as both parties agree. However, this often leads to legal issues later, including cases where the seller commits a breach of contract (default). For this reason, the author conducted this study with the following research questions: 1. What are the legal consequences of the sale and purchase deed concerning default in land sale and purchase transactions carried out by the buyer? 2. How is the legal protection for the seller in the event of a default in a land sale and purchase transaction? The theories used to address these research questions are, first, the theory of agreements, and second, the theory of legal protection. This study employs normative legal research. The research approaches used include a legislative approach and a case approach. The legal material collection technique involves identifying and inventorying positive legal regulations, books, journals, and other legal material sources. Legal material analysis techniques are conducted through grammatical interpretation and legal construction methods. The research findings indicate that land sale and purchase transactions under the principles of clarity and cash payment allow for the drafting of sale and purchase deeds even though the transaction has not been fully paid by the buyer. This creates an opportunity for the seller to commit a breach of contract in such transactions, revealing a lack of preventive legal protection for the buyer. The legal consequence of the sale and purchase deed is that it lacks legal force if it can be proven that a breach of contract occurred during its drafting.

Contracts and agreements are two different things. This is because a contract is basically one type of agreement. However, not all agreements reach the level of a legally binding and enforceable contract. As the problems that will be discussed in this paper are the terms of the agreement in the Indonesian civil law legal system and the terms of the contract in the English common law legal system. In Indonesia, the validity of a contract consists of four conditions, namely the agreement of those who bind themselves, the ability to make an agreement, a certain matter, and a halal or permissible cause. Meanwhile, in English there are five conditions, namely agreement (offer and acceptance, intention to create legal relations, and genuineness of consent), capacity, consideration, legal purpose, and form of contract. Based on this, the author analyzes the comparison of the validity of an agreement or contract between Indonesia and the English and its implementation. Then for the research method used is the normative legal approach method which places the law as a norm system building. The results of the research obtained are that there are significant differences in the requirements regarding the validity of an agreement or contract between Indonesian law and English law, although each of these requirements also has similarities and differences in its provisions.