Publication Search

Crime, an unlawful act that contradicts ethics and norms, has now become a primary factor for the police in Lampung province. This presents a challenge for the police institution in predicting high crime rates. However, there are still many crimes that have not become the main focus of problem-solving at the Lampung Regional Police.This research aims to identify the types and criminal acts of crime with the highest recorded incidence in a crime dataset by performing classification using the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The data was obtained from investigators at the Directorate of General Criminal Investigation of the Lampung Regional Police, with a total of 12,034 JTP (Total Criminal Acts) and 7,518 PTP (Crime Resolution) data points for each type of crime, distributed across the Regional Police, City Police, and District Police throughout Lampung province. The classification process using the Naïve Bayes algorithm reveals the relationship between the work unit (Satker) and the type of crime handled, thereby identifying crime patterns based on the location where they are handled. The results of the research, which involved converting numerical data into binomial (binary) form using the "Numerical to Binominal" feature in Rapid miner, show that the analysis and modeling process, especially in algorithms like Naïve Bayes or decision trees, is more effective when using data in a binary format. Thus, the initial dataset can be visualized in the form of a , with the size of the text varying according to the level of each high-incidence crime; the larger the text, the more frequently or significantly the crime occurred or was reported. The application of this method can help in identifying patterns, dominant trends, and areas of focus for more targeted law enforcement efforts or crime prevention policies.

This study aims to analyze the factors that influence students' interest in continuing their education to college using a machine learning approach. Data was collected through an online questionnaire completed by 727 students between July 27 and August 22, 2025, covering 23 variables consisting of respondent identity (gender, grade level, major) as well as internal and external factors such as parental support, learning motivation, and preferred type of college. The data preparation stage was carried out through column cleaning, deletion of empty data, encoding of categorical variables, and division of the dataset into 80% training data and 20% test data. The Naive Bayes algorithm of the CategoricalNB type was used because it was suitable for the categorical nature of the data. The evaluation results showed that the model was able to predict student interest with 96% accuracy. For the class of students interested in continuing their studies, the precision, recall, and F1-score values were above 0.95, while the performance in the class of students who were not interested was slightly lower due to the smaller amount of data. These findings show that Naive Bayes is proven to be effective and reliable in classifying students' interest in continuing their studies and can be the basis for decision-making in designing more targeted educational strategies.

This study aims to analyze and compare the performance of the Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree algorithms in predicting the purchase intention of e-commerce visitors using the Online Shoppers Purchasing Intention Dataset, which consists of 12,330 records and 18 variables, with the Revenue variable serving as the classification target. The preprocessing stage involved transforming categorical and boolean variables into numerical form, standardizing features using StandardScaler, and splitting the dataset into 80 percent training data and 20 percent testing data. Model evaluation was conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics, and was further strengthened by 10-fold cross-validation to obtain more stable results. The findings indicate that KNN achieved the highest accuracy of 0.866180, while Naive Bayes produced the highest recall value of 0.690998 and the highest ROC-AUC value of 0.821696. Meanwhile, Decision Tree demonstrated relatively balanced performance with an accuracy of 0.857259 and an F1-score of 0.571776, whereas the cross-validation results identified KNN as the model with the highest average accuracy of 0.8770. These findings suggest that the selection of a classification model for purchase intention prediction cannot rely solely on a single evaluation metric, as each algorithm possesses different strengths. Therefore, a comparative approach among algorithms can help determine the most suitable model for supporting consumer behavior analysis on e-commerce platforms.