SciRepID - Scientific Publication Search

Publication Search

35,802 articles from 393 journals · 1,447 citations tracked

Showing 1-2 of 2

Analytics

Okka Hermawan Yulianto; Okka Hermawan Yulianto; Setyawan Wibisono

Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer 2023 STEKOM PRESS

Mushrooms are very diverse with characteristics of each type, there are 1,433,800 types of mushrooms that have not been recognized. In this study, researchers used the Neural Network and Deep Learning Inception V3 methods as a feature extraction process in images to classify mushroom images based on genus with the Orange Data Mining application. There are 9 genera of mushrooms used in this study, namely Agaricus, Amanita, Boletus, Cortinarius, Entoloma, Hygrocybe, Lactarius, Russula, and Suillus. The total dataset used is 2,700, with 300 images for each genus. The test uses the cross-validation method which is applied to the confusion matrix to get precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy values. In this study, the final classification results were obtained with an accuracy of 82.5% and the genus Boletus mushroom obtained the best results with an accuracy of 98.9%.

Aji Priyambodo; Prihati Prihati

Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer 2020 STEKOM PRESS

Classification is one of the most widely used techniques in machine learning. Text classification is the process of classifying data according to pre-determined groups or classes. Where in most cases, text classification uses labeled training data to obtain the rules used to classify test data into predefined groups. In this study, it is proposed to use CountVectorizer for Indonesian text classification which will be compared with TF-IDF Term Weighting and its three feature levels, namely Character Level, Word Level and N-gram Level as feature extraction which is implemented together with Naive Bayes classification and the BPPPTIndToEngCorpusHalfM dataset. To compare the classification performance, this study uses 10-Fold Cross Validation and Split Data using a ratio of 90:10, while to evaluate the accuracy of the authors using the F1-Score and AUC with the hope that this study will get good accuracy results so that it can be used as a reference to be developed using another method. The F1-Score accuracy obtained in this study was 0.93 and the AUC score was 0.95.