Publication Search

This study stems from a classic question in the study of political hadith regarding leadership, specifically the hadith "The Imams are from Quraysh," which is often understood textually as requiring leaders to be from the Quraysh tribe. This kind of understanding often stops at the normative and historical level, without considering the socio-political context of modern society, which is fundamentally different from the early Islamic era. As a result, a gap emerged between the moral message of the hadith and the reality of the leadership system in democratic countries like Indonesia. This research aims to reanalyse the meaning of hadiths about Quraysh and non-Quraysh leadership, and to trace their relevance to the concept of state leadership in the Indonesian constitutional system, placing Islamic political theory and modern leadership theory on an equal footing (theory = theory). This research employs a qualitative approach based on library research, with the primary sources being political hadiths and classical references such as al-Ahkam al-Sulthaniyyah by al-Mawardi, supplemented by contemporary literature on the modern Indonesian government system. The analysis was conducted using comparative methods and content analysis to explore the commonalities and differences between the concept of Imamah in Islam and leadership in modern democratic systems. The research findings indicate that the hadith about Quraysh leadership cannot be understood rigidly as a limitation of lineage, but rather as an ethical guideline emphasising the principles of justice, trust, responsibility, and public interest. The ethical values in the hadith align with the basic principles of the presidential system in Indonesia, such as public accountability, limitation of power, and popular sovereignty, as regulated in the 1945 Constitution. Despite challenges such as corruption, the politicisation of religion, and weak leadership morality, the values of the hadith remain relevant if translated into public norms and modern governance practices. This research confirms that leadership in Islam and Indonesian democracy can complement each other, with Islam providing a moral and spiritual foundation, while democracy offers the legal and political structure to realise it.

Indonesia is a pluralistic country with diverse religions, races, ethnicities, and customs, making freedom of expression an essential right protected by law. Article 28E of the 1945 Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to freely express their beliefs and opinions. From the perspective of fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah (Islamic constitutional politics), freedom of expression is a right that must be safeguarded by the state as long as it aligns with the principles of deliberation and does not contradict Islamic law. This study aims to examine the freedom of expression of Syaykh Al-Zaytun in light of Siyasah Dusturiyah and Article 28E of the 1945 Constitution. The research uses a normative juridical approach with primary data sources including the Constitution and the book Ilmu Hukum dalam Simpul Siyasah Dusturiyah by Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis, as well as secondary sources such as books, journals, documents, and legal regulations. The findings indicate that Syaykh Al-Zaytun’s freedom of expression is permissible under both perspectives, provided certain conditions are met: it must comply with Islamic law and national law, uphold public interest, cause no harm, and be accompanied by social responsibility. Syaykh Panji Gumilang’s views should be understood as part of public discourse, not hate speech, as they aim to foster nationalism and the common good.  

Marriage in Islam is a sacred institution aimed at forming a family that embodies sakinah, mawaddah, and rahmah, while also serving as a legitimate and responsible means to fulfill biological needs. In the socio-religious context, religious figures such as kyai play a significant role, particularly in guiding the community to maintain household harmony. This study explores the role of kyai in promoting household harmony among Islamic boarding school alumni in Gading District, an area where the spiritual bond between kyai and santri remains strong. These alumni often face various challenges in their domestic lives, including differences in perspectives with their spouses and shifts in social values in the modern era. In such circumstances, kyai serve as spiritual advisors, counselors, and mediators who offer solutions based on Islamic values and local wisdom. This research aims to identify the types of guidance provided by kyai, as well as the supporting factors and obstacles they encounter in fulfilling their roles. The findings are expected to enrich scholarly discourse in the field of socio-religious studies and offer practical insights for religious leaders to strengthen their roles as agents of family harmony amid the complexities of modernization.

Islam prescribes marriage as a sacred and fundamental institution in human life, aiming to preserve dignity, lineage, and to build a harmonious (sakinah), loving (mawaddah), and compassionate (rahmah) family. In Islamic teachings, marriage can be conducted either monogamously or polygamously, with specific conditions. In Indonesia, polygamous practices are strictly regulated by various legal provisions, such as Law Number 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law. Nevertheless, polygamy remains a controversial issue in society, often carried out without fulfilling legal requirements, such as through unregistered (sirri) marriages. This phenomenon reflects a legal dualism between religious norms and state regulations. Furthermore, the social construction of polygamy shows that it is not merely a religious or legal issue, but also a product of social, cultural, economic dynamics, and the evolution of modern values. This study aims to explore how social construction shapes the perception and practice of polygamy and its implications for household harmony. Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relevance of polygamy in contemporary society and its impact on family structure and child welfare.

Globalization affects the fast-moving aspects of industrialization both at the central and regional levels, accompanied by the dynamics of the development process. Lakardowo Village is one of the villages in Mojokerto Regency, East Java Province. In this village there is a hazardous and toxic waste processing industry managed by PT.PRIA which was established based on the recommendation of the Mojokerto Regent Decree in 2017. The licensing for this environmental permit has had a negative impact, namely conflict between the Lakardowo village community and the company, the Mojokerto district government, and the pro-company community. In addition, another impact of this waste treatment activity is the source of water pollution and disease in the communities living in the factory area. This article attempts to analyze the chronological sequence and forms of conflict as well as the factors that cause conflict in Lakardowo village. The research method in this article is qualitative research. The findings in the field show that the conflict has occurred for many years and experienced various dynamics of conflict forms both horizontally and vertically.

Every country has legal regulations governing marriage in an effort to create a clear legal basis for its implementation. Regulations regarding marriage in Indonesia in general and as a whole are regulated by Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Overall, Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage covers aspects relating to the requirements, procedures and rights inherent in couples who have legally entered into a marriage. Article 57 of the Marriage Law regulates mixed marriages, which are defined as marriages between two people who are subject to different laws in Indonesia because of their different nationalities. Divorce can occur in marriages, including mixed marriages. Divorce in a mixed marriage means a divorce that occurs between a husband and wife, one of whom is an Indonesian citizen (WNI) and the other is a foreign citizen (WNA). The laws and regulations governing mixed divorce are Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and Law Number 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship. In this research, examples of mixed divorce cases between Indonesian citizens and foreign citizens will be taken by studying the Putusan PA DENPASAR Nomor 406/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Dps which was decided at the Denpasar Religious Court, Denpasar City, Bali Province.  

Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.