Publication Search

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) play a crucial role in creating consistency, efficiency, and accountability in governance. However, the process of developing SOPs within the bureaucracy often faces complex organizational communication challenges. This study aims to analyze the organizational communication process in developing SOPs at the Serang City Regional Inspectorate, focusing on the role of the Secretariat as the administrative coordination center. The method used was a qualitative case study approach, involving in-depth interviews with key informants, observation, and documentation analysis. The results indicate that organizational communication plays a crucial role in every stage of SOP development, from data collection and drafting, to cross-sector coordination, and document finalization. The Secretariat acts as a liaison between units, archives manager, and coordination meeting facilitator. However, obstacles identified include a top-down vertical communication pattern, differing perceptions between units, delays in information flow due to bureaucracy, and limited technology-based communication tools. Improvements were made through the establishment of cross-unit forums, communication training, and the use of online applications to strengthen two-way communication. The implications of this research indicate that increasing the effectiveness of organizational communication is a key factor in accelerating the process of preparing SOPs and supporting the creation of more responsive, efficient, and accountable governance.

This study discusses the increase in the number of inmates related to the crime of drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking which resulted in overcrowding in the Class IIB Siborongborong Prison. In this regard, it specifically discusses the factors causing the increase in the number of inmates related to the crime of drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking in the Class IIB Siborongborong Prison, the impact of overcrowding in the Class IIB Siborongborong Prison due to the increase in the number of inmates related to the crime of drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking, and solutions to overcome drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking so that overcrowding does not occur in the Class IIB Siborongborong Prison. This research is a holistic normative research, prescriptive analytical in nature, using normative methods, referring to legal norms contained in legislation. Data used as research supplements. This research uses the type of legislative regulatory approach, conceptual approach, and philosophical approach. Deductive qualitative analysis using Classical Economic Theory and Sociological Subcultural Pressure Theory, Legal Effectiveness Theory, and Benefit Theory as analytical tools.  The results of the study concluded that there were 3 (three) factors causing the increase in the number of inmates related to the crime of drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking in Class IIB Siborongborong Prison. There were 2 (two) impacts of overcrowding in Class IIB Siborongborong Prison due to the increase in the number of inmates related to the crime of drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking. There were 7 (seven) solutions to overcome drug abuse and/or illicit trafficking so that overcrowding would not occur in Class IIB Siborongborong Prison.

Managing budgets in public institutions is not merely a matter of calculating numbers, but also about ensuring that every rupiah spent generates a tangible impact on society. As public needs continue to grow, the Department of Population and Civil Registration (Disdukcapil) of Surabaya faces significant challenges in providing administrative services that are fast, accurate, and transparent. In this context, internal audits play a strategic role not only as tools for correcting errors, but also in ensuring that budget management is carried out wisely and effectively. This study aims to examine the role of internal audits in the budget management of Disdukcapil and their contribution to improving the quality of public services. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through documentation, interviews, and literature review. The findings are expected to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationship between internal oversight and the quality of public services in Surabaya.

White collar crime is increasingly prevalent in various corporate sectors and causes significant financial losses and damage to public trust. This type of crime includes embezzlement of funds, manipulation of financial statements, bribery, insider trading in the capital market, and theft of customer personal data. Although it occurs a lot, the prevention of white collar crime is still not optimal and the perpetrators are rarely prosecuted properly. This paper aims to analyze the various determinants that influence the occurrence of white collar crime in order to formulate policy recommendations and prevention strategies in the future. A systematic approach is used by applying the fraud triangle theory which focuses on the three main elements that cause fraud, namely pressure, opportunity and rationalization. The results of the study show that pressure to meet high performance targets and large bonuses often encourage individuals to commit fraud. Meanwhile, weak supervision and lack of transparency create opportunities for fraud. Perpetrators also often justify their actions, for example by assuming that they will not be caught or the value of the loss is small. The complexity of modern corporate operations also increases opportunities for white-collar crime. Effective prevention efforts must be comprehensive by involving various parties and strengthening a number of aspects as controls. The role of internal and external supervisors (auditors) of companies needs to be continuously improved, supported by modem fraud detection technology tools. Whistleblowing mechanisms need to be strengthened in every company and kept confidential to encourage early reporting of fraud indications.