Publication Search

This study aims to analyze the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Firm Size, and Sales Growth on Financial Performance at PT Ace Hardware Indonesia Tbk listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2015–2024 period. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in this study is proxied by institutional ownership, financial performance is measured using Return on Assets (ROA), firm size is measured by the natural logarithm of total assets, and sales growth is measured using the sales growth ratio. This study employed a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The data used were secondary data in the form of annual financial statements obtained from the official websites of the IDX and the company. Data analysis techniques included descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple and simple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing consisting of t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination with the assistance of SPSS version 27 software. The results of the study indicate that partially, the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) variable has a t-value of -1.526 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. The firm size variable has a t-value of -2.857 > t-table 2.447, indicating a significant negative effect on the company’s financial performance. The sales growth variable has a t-value of 1.593 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. Simultaneously, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), firm size, and sales growth have a significant effect on financial performance, with an F-value of 13.023 > F-table 4.76 and a significance value of 0.005 < 0.05. This study is expected to provide consideration for management and investors in decision-making and serve as a reference for future research in related fields.

This study examines the comparative profitability of PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk before and during the boycott issue that emerged as part of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement in 2023. Profitability was selected as the focus because it is a key financial performance indicator that reflects the company’s ability to generate returns under changing social and economic pressures. The research aims to evaluate differences in financial performance using three indicators: Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Net Profit Margin (NPM) across two periods, namely before the boycott (2021–2022) and during the boycott (2023–2024). Employing a quantitative descriptive-comparative approach, the study analyzed financial ratios and applied the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. The findings reveal a decline in ROA from 30.20% (2021) and 29.29% (2022) to 28.81% (2023) and 20.99% (2024), as well as a drop in NPM from 14.56% and 13.02% to 12.49% and 9.59% during the boycott period. Conversely, ROE increased to 156.74% in 2024, largely driven by a sharper decline in equity compared to net profit. Nevertheless, statistical testing indicates no significant difference in profitability between the two periods. These results suggest that while profitability trends weakened, the boycott had no statistically significant impact, implying that investor and consumer responses were not strong or sustained enough to materially affect financial performance.

This research investigates how a company's financial performance is affected by good corporate governance. This type of research is quantitative, the variable (GCG) is represented by institutional ownership and independent board of commissioners. Meanwhile, financial performance is represented by return on assets. This study analyzes 67 industrial companies that have been listed on the IDX from 2021-2024. Purposive sampling was used to collect samples, and the data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results show that financial performance is partially influenced by institutional ownership and also the independent board of commissioners.

The profitability ratio is used as a benchmark in determining stock returns, because the profitability ratio is a ratio that measures how efficiently a company uses its assets and manages its operations. The higher the profit generated, the higher the stock return that investors will get. Included in this ratio are ROE (Return on Equity) and NPM (Net Profit Margin). The design of this research is a Literature Review or literature review. ROE is often referred to as profitability of own capital. This amount is obtained by dividing net profit after tax by total capital. A high ROE number shows the industry's ability to generate profits for shareholders. On the other hand, a high level of profitability will cause less external funds to be used. Companies with high profitability will have large internal funds. An increase in ROE increases the company's sales value, which has an impact on share prices. These two factors have a positive influence on stock returns, which means companies with high ROE and net profit margin tend to have higher stock returns. Therefore, investors can consider ROE and net profit margin as indicators of company performance that can influence stock returns when choosing investments.

The assessment rating of bank hlth is expected to evalute the prformance of the banking industry. Because bank healtiness represent good financial condition and good management. Risk-based Bank Rating (RBBR) method is used Bank Indonesia as a standard to appraise the rating of the bank health. This study to find out the sundeness level of bank in terms of the aspects of Risk profille, Good Corporate Govermance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This was an deskriptif analysis, with the object study is BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. the data were collected through documentation and date analysis techniquen was an analysis of the soundness of bank using the Risk-Bases Bank Rating approach with an assesment converage including Non Ferforming loand, Loan to Deposit Rating, Good Corporate Governmence, Return on Assets, Operational costs on operating income, and Capital Adequacy Ratio factors. The resulth howed the condition of BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. at “healthy criteria” with Non performing Loand of 1,8%, Loan to Deposit Rating of 85%, Maximum credit limit of 0,083%, Return on Assets of 0,034%, Operational costs on operating income of 0,070%, and Capital Adequacy Ratio of 41%..

The property sector is one of the business instruments usually chosen by investors. This research capital market focuses on the housing construction sector originating from property companies. This company is the same as others, namely buying and selling shares at competitive prices per share. This share buying and selling activity can be dominated by price seasonality criteria when the price of each share rises or falls. Of all types of shares, Property Companies both have low and high return risks. Therefore, risks in the capital market can be predicted using the criteria of Return on Assets, Return on Equity and Earning Per Share. The research was carried out quantitatively by processing secondary data in the form of company financial reports. The research object was property companies registered on the IDX which were then sampled using probability sampling so that 13 companies were found as samples with a research period of 3 years. The method used is Panel Data Regression analysis. The results obtained are partial return on assets, return on equity has a significant positive effect on share prices and earnings per share has a significant negative effect on stock prices. Meanwhile, simultaneously return on assets, return on equity and earnings per share have a positive and significant influence on share prices. The results of the R square test explain that the independent variable is able to explain 84.4% of the variables studied

This research aims to analysis the soundness level of banks using the RGEC method at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk in 2018-2021. The data studied is in the form of financial statements of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk for 2018-2021. The data collection technique used is the documentation technique. The data analysis technique used is a qualitative descriptive analysis technique using the RGEC method. The results of this research show that Bank Mandiri for 2018-2021 is viewed from the aspect of risk profile with two ratios, namely the ratio of Non-Performing Loans for banks in a healthy condition and the ratio of Loan to Deposit Ratio for banks in a fairly healthy condition. Aspects of Good Corporate Governance get the title of very healthy. Earnings aspect with two ratios, namely the ratio of the bank's Return on Assets in a very healthy condition and the ratio of the bank's Net Interest Margin in a healthy condition. Aspects of Capital with the ratio of Capital Adequacy Ratio of the bank is in very healthy condition.