Publication Search

This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing an alternative institution for resolving agrarian disputes in the legal system in Indonesia. Land itself functions as a social asset and a capital asset. The role of land as a social asset is interpreted as a tool to strengthen social unity in people's lives, while capital assets are interpreted as land being an essential factor for development. The interest of every person to be able to own and control land for the benefit of life is the most basic thing why there must be serious efforts in handling agrarian conflicts in Indonesia. This study identifies two main issues, namely first, what is the urgency of establishing an alternative institution for resolving agrarian disputes in an effort to optimize conflict resolution, and second, what form of alternative dispute resolution is used in an alternative institution for resolving disputes in the agrarian sector. The research method used is normative research using a statutory approach, relying on statutory regulations as the main basis for conducting analysis and producing new concepts in handling conflicts. The results of this study indicate that although in practice there are already institutions that have the authority to resolve. However, in its implementation, there are still various obstacles, both in terms of procedural and implementation in the field. This is what then encourages the presence of a new legal system ecosystem for more concrete conflict handling in the agrarian sector.

This research aims to determine the position of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia and to determine the application of restorative justice in the criminal justice system. This type of research uses empirical legal research, empirical legal research is a legal research method that functions to see the law in real terms and examine how law works in society. The position of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia can provide justice that focuses on the needs of the victims, perpetrators of crimes, and also involves community participation, and does not merely fulfill legal provisions or merely impose criminal penalties. In this case, the victim is also involved in the process, while the perpetrator of the crime is also encouraged to take responsibility for his actions, namely by correcting the mistakes he has made. The implementation of restorative justice in the criminal justice system can be seen from various policies and laws and regulations currently in force, but in reality there are inconsistencies between enforcement officials in implementing restorative justice in a case. In fact, many cases ignore restorative justice and result in the criminal being convicted.