Publication Search

Corruption is an extraordinary crime and has a systemic impact that is detrimental to the state and society at large. To overcome this problem, the Indonesian legal system provides the option of implementing the death penalty, which is regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. However, the application of the death penalty has raised significant debate from various perspectives, both legal, philosophical, and sociological, considering that this action is contrary to the principle of respect for human rights. This study will discuss the threat of the death penalty as a form of ultimum remedium, namely as a last resort carried out in certain circumstances, such as when corruption occurs in a crisis or disaster situation. To analyze the effectiveness and urgency of implementing the death penalty in the context of anti-corruption law enforcement, a legal-normative approach is used

The corruption case in the BTS 4G project by the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (Kominfo), which involved the misuse of funds in the construction of BTS towers in Indonesia's 3T (underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost) regions, has become a major public concern in recent years. The Rp 9.8 trillion project is suspected to have been misappropriated by several officials involved. This study aims to examine the role of social media in increasing public participation in the monitoring and mitigation of the corruption case. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach combined with social media analysis. The findings show that social media plays a significant role in accelerating the dissemination of information related to the BTS 4G corruption case, raising public awareness, and exerting social pressure on law enforcement agencies to take action. Furthermore, social media also facilitates digital activism, which mobilizes public support and strengthens oversight of government policies. This study concludes that social media serves as an effective tool for social control, although it also faces challenges in terms of the spread of hoaxes and disinformation.  

Current efforts to eradicate corruption are not only focused on arresting and imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators, but also through efforts to restore the country's financial and economic losses by confiscating assets or property belonging to perpetrators of corruption. Asset recovery or confiscation of assets from perpetrators of corruption is an important thing that must be considered in handling corruption cases, as a form of recovery of state losses. Therefore, there must be a good policy formulation to support the implementation of asset recovery. Indonesia needs special regulations or rules that have legal force and have special rules regarding the mechanism for confiscating assets and property suspected of being obtained from the proceeds of corruption. This study is entitled Asset Confiscation as a Form of Punishment for Perpetrators of Corruption. The purpose of this study is to determine and explain legal policies related to asset confiscation.