Publication Search

This qualitative literature review examines the strategic role of liquidation during financial crises, with a focus on the externalities it generates and the design of optimal insolvency interventions. Synthesizing recent empirical and theoretical research, the study highlights how liquidation decisions—particularly in systemic downturns—affect broader economic stability through credit disruption, asset fire sales, and employment losses. The review finds that while prompt liquidation of non-viable firms can facilitate recovery, poorly structured interventions risk perpetuating inefficiencies and moral hazard. Comparative insights from diverse institutional contexts emphasize the need for hybrid insolvency regimes that balance liquidation with restructuring flexibility. This synthesis contributes to ongoing debates on how to enhance crisis responsiveness in insolvency law and policy design.

This study explores the impact of separating audit and risk committees on financial reporting quality, emphasizing regulatory reforms introduced following the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Employing a qualitative literature review methodology, the research synthesizes findings from prior studies to evaluate the efficacy of these reforms in enhancing financial transparency and mitigating audit failures. The analysis reveals mixed outcomes, with evidence supporting the improved independence and oversight capabilities of segregated committees, while highlighting challenges such as resource constraints and evolving regulatory compliance demands. Comparative insights underscore variations across jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of contextualizing governance practices. The study concludes with a discussion on the implications for policy and practice, alongside identified limitations and avenues for future research.

This qualitative literature review explores the advances and challenges in predicting SME failures, focusing on methodological trends, data imbalance solutions, and model validation practices. Over recent years, machine learning techniques have gained prominence, replacing traditional statistical models and improving predictive accuracy. Key strategies for overcoming data imbalance, such as Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and cost-sensitive learning, have also been highlighted. However, challenges persist, particularly in model interpretability, generalization, and overfitting. The review emphasizes the need for continuous refinement of predictive models and validation practices to ensure real-world applicability. The findings suggest that while considerable progress has been made, future research should aim to enhance model transparency and address limitations in data representation to improve SME failure prediction across diverse contexts.

This research explores the relationship between public information precision, borrower risk-taking behavior, and financial reporting regulations. It examines how varying levels of accounting disclosures influence creditor-borrower dynamics in financial markets. Enhanced precision in public information, such as accounting earnings, promotes market efficiency by reducing information asymmetry and improving creditors' ability to accurately assess borrower creditworthiness. While higher precision generally mitigates borrower risk-shifting tendencies, regulatory context and economic conditions modulate these effects. This literature review systematically identifies and analyzes peer-reviewed articles on forecast dispersion, accuracy, and their implications for cross-sectional return anomalies in financial markets. The findings reveal that higher forecast dispersion is linked to greater uncertainty and perceived risk, leading to higher expected returns, while accurate forecasts reduce information asymmetry and improve market efficiency. Differences in forecast precision significantly contribute to market anomalies. In conclusion, forecast dispersion and accuracy are critical in explaining cross-sectional return anomalies. Future research should refine models, explore behavioral biases, and evaluate technological advancements, emphasizing balanced financial reporting regulations to harness transparency benefits while mitigating potential costs during economic expansions.

This qualitative literature review explores how various forms of capital—beyond financial investment—shape power dynamics between founders and investors in new ventures. Drawing on organization theory, entrepreneurship, and governance literature, the review synthesizes findings on human, social, reputational, and symbolic capital as sources of strategic influence. It challenges the traditional dominance of financial capital in venture control and highlights how non-financial assets enable founders to assert influence, co-create governance, and navigate investor relations. The analysis reveals that power in new ventures is dynamic, relational, and context-dependent, offering a reframed understanding that informs both academic theory and entrepreneurial practice