Publication Search

72,574 articles from 669 journals · 2,111 citations tracked

Showing 1-2 of 2

Analytics

Rizal, Muhammad; Permana, Ngadi

This qualitative literature review examines the strategic role of liquidation during financial crises, with a focus on the externalities it generates and the design of optimal insolvency interventions. Synthesizing recent empirical and theoretical research, the study highlights how liquidation decisions—particularly in systemic downturns—affect broader economic stability through credit disruption, asset fire sales, and employment losses. The review finds that while prompt liquidation of non-viable firms can facilitate recovery, poorly structured interventions risk perpetuating inefficiencies and moral hazard. Comparative insights from diverse institutional contexts emphasize the need for hybrid insolvency regimes that balance liquidation with restructuring flexibility. This synthesis contributes to ongoing debates on how to enhance crisis responsiveness in insolvency law and policy design.

Rizal, Muhammad; Kusnanto, Eri

This research explores the relationship between public information precision, borrower risk-taking behavior, and financial reporting regulations. It examines how varying levels of accounting disclosures influence creditor-borrower dynamics in financial markets. Enhanced precision in public information, such as accounting earnings, promotes market efficiency by reducing information asymmetry and improving creditors' ability to accurately assess borrower creditworthiness. While higher precision generally mitigates borrower risk-shifting tendencies, regulatory context and economic conditions modulate these effects. This literature review systematically identifies and analyzes peer-reviewed articles on forecast dispersion, accuracy, and their implications for cross-sectional return anomalies in financial markets. The findings reveal that higher forecast dispersion is linked to greater uncertainty and perceived risk, leading to higher expected returns, while accurate forecasts reduce information asymmetry and improve market efficiency. Differences in forecast precision significantly contribute to market anomalies. In conclusion, forecast dispersion and accuracy are critical in explaining cross-sectional return anomalies. Future research should refine models, explore behavioral biases, and evaluate technological advancements, emphasizing balanced financial reporting regulations to harness transparency benefits while mitigating potential costs during economic expansions.