Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim
The problems studied in this paper are how to regulate the implementation of rehabilitation for narcotics addicts based on the judge's decision and how the role of the competent agency in the implementation of rehabilitation for narcotics addicts is based on the judge's decision.
Provisions for rehabilitation for narcotics abusers are regulated in Law No. 35 of 2009, it is stated in Article 54 that Narcotics Addicts and Narcotics Victims are required to undergo medical and social rehabilitation. This is clarified in Article 3 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency Number 11 of 2014 concerning Procedures for Handling Narcotics Addicts and/or Defendants of Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abusers in Rehabilitation Institutions (BNN Regulation 11/2014) which stipulates that Narcotics Addicts and Victims of narcotics abusers who are without rights and against the law as suspects and/or defendants in narcotics abuse who are undergoing the process of investigation, prosecution, and trial in court are given treatment, care and recovery in rehabilitation institutions.
At the time the judge decides on rehabilitation, the judge will determine whether the person concerned (in this case the Narcotics Addict) undergoes rehabilitation or not based on whether or not the crime committed is proven. This is regulated as in Article 103 of Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The Role of Agencies in the Rehabilitation of Narcotics Addicts in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics as a non-penal effort of the National Narcotics Agency is the implementation of mandatory reporting of Narcotics addicts, Recipient institutions must report (IPWL) Narcotics addicts, Medical rehabilitation, Social rehabilitation
Antonius Aditya Pratama (2023). Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim. JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v1i1.1705
Antonius Aditya Pratama, "Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim," JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.
Antonius Aditya Pratama. "Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim." JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.
Antonius Aditya Pratama. "Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim." JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL 1, no. 1 (2023).
Antonius Aditya Pratama (2023) 'Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim', JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, 1(1). doi: 10.55606/jhpis.v1i1.1705.
Antonius Aditya Pratama. Kewajiban Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu Narkotika berdasarkan Putusan Hakim. JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL. 2023;1(1).
Penerapan Pemeriksaan Saksi Secara Bersama-Sama Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana
Uun Ulfiana; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
The City Government's Role In Begging
Hardi Fardiansyah; Nanda Dwi Rizkia
Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia
Gani Hamaminata
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Hubungan Kerja Tindakan Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja Oleh Perusahaan Berdasar Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan
I Made Chossy Narayanan; I Wayan Novy Purwanto
Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Produk Kreatif Usaha Kecil Menengah dengan Perlindungan Hukumnya Di Kabupaten Buleleng
I Gusti Agung Wisnu Satria Wangsa; I Gusti Ngurah Dharma Laksana
Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Peraturan Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertahanan Nasional (PERMEN ATR/BPN) Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Dan Pasal 19 Ayat 2 UUPA
Heriyanti Heriyanti; Sandi Noel Rajagukguk; Samuel Sitinjak; Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan