Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir ; Rika Ratna Permata ; Ranti Fauza Mayana
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA 📅 2023 Vol 1, No 3 🔗 DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v1i3.581
Abstract
The registration of trademarks with the “first to file” constitutive system, adopted by Indonesia, is often abused by trademark owners with malicious intent by first registering their trademarks that are similar to well-known trademarks, knowing that the well-known trademarks have not been registered in Indonesia. This was the case with the “Starbucks” trademark owned by Starbucks Corporation in Decision Number 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022. Starbucks Corporation filed a lawsuit for the cancellation of “Starbucks” trademark in class 34 owned by Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company on the grounds of similarity to a well-known trademark for a different class and the malicious intent to exploit the reputation of the “Starbucks" trademark owned by Starbucks Corporation. The first lawsuit filed by Starbucks Corporation was rejected by the panel of judges, which led to Starbucks Corporation filing a cassation request. The research results indicates that the panel of judges in Decision Number 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 is in accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The legal consequences for all parties involved in the trademark dispute after the decision are the cancellation of the "Starbucks" trademark owned by Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company from the General Register, the cessation of the use of the "Starbucks" trademark in class 34 by the cassation respondent, and the strengthening of the "Starbucks" trademark owned by the cassation applicant, with its status as a well-known trademark being affirmed.
 
Keywords
Bad Faith; Similarity; Trademark Cancellation; Well-Known Trademark
How to Cite

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir, et al. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company . Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i3.581

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir; Rika Ratna Permata; Ranti Fauza Mayana, "Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company ," Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, vol. 1, no. 3, 2023.

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir; Rika Ratna Permata; Ranti Fauza Mayana. "Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company ." Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, vol. 1, no. 3, 2023.

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir; Rika Ratna Permata; Ranti Fauza Mayana. "Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company ." Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA 1, no. 3 (2023).

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir, et al. (2023) 'Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company ', Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, 1(3). doi: 10.55606/birokrasi.v1i3.581.

Sania Akalila Putri Thahir; Rika Ratna Permata; Ranti Fauza Mayana. Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Antara Starbucks Corporation Dan PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company . Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA. 2023;1(3).

Artikel Terkait

Analisis Yuridis Kebebasan Berekspresi di Era Digital: Transformasi Pasal 27A UU No. 1 Tahun 2024 dan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional

Putri Rut Sri Jaya Lubis; Putri Dwi Rahmadani; Izumi Bernadetta Gultom

Implementasi Kebebasan Beragama di Tanggerang terhadap Etnis Umat Beragama Kristen

Osvaldo Antonio Linjewas; Abrar Rosyan Ali Barus; Nur Rahman

Perlindungan Hak Cipta atas Materi Stand-up Comedy terhadap Tindakan Duplikasi tanpa Izin

Umair Umair; Dudung Hidayat; Raden Handiriono

Apakah Siswa pada Sekolah Swasta Berhak Mendapatkan Pendidikan Gratis?: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 3/PUU-XXII/2024

Nadia Anatasya; Puti Alya; Indah Nabila Vandini

Asimetri Kekuasaan dan Potensi Pelanggaran HAM: Studi Kasus Interaksi Brimob dengan Pengemudi Ojek Online

Riska Aulia; Caesya Nur Amarha; Syifa Aurelia

Ketidaksesuaian antara Regulasi dan Realitas Sosial dalam Pemenuhan Hak Atas Pendidikan di Indonesia

Andi Dita Kobayashi; Putri Dea Syahhira; Chelsha Christy Napitupulu
Tren Sitasi Jurnal