Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada

Desak Made Widi Antari
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora 📅 2024 Vol 1, No 4 🔗 DOI: 10.62383/humif.v1i4.645
Abstract
This research aims to describe Article 157 of Law Number 10 Year 2016 authorizes the Constitutional Court to resolve the dispute over the regional head election results quarrel before a special court of election is formed. The authority of the Constitutional Court is limited by the provisions of Article 158 of the Act. Consequently, only disputes on election results that meet the threshold of the vote that has a legal standing to be able to file a lawsuit to the Constitutional Court. The restriction in Article 158 leaves many parties with the view that the Constitutional Court fails to become an institution capable of safeguarding the Constitutional Rights of Citizens and Article 158 provides an opportunity for candidates to commit significant violations in order to maintain the threshold of the vote.
Keywords
Dispute Resolution; Sound Threshold; Constitutional law
How to Cite

Desak Made Widi Antari (2024). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i4.645

Desak Made Widi Antari, "Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada," Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 4, 2024.

Desak Made Widi Antari. "Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 4, 2024.

Desak Made Widi Antari. "Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora 1, no. 4 (2024).

Desak Made Widi Antari (2024) 'Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada', Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(4). doi: 10.62383/humif.v1i4.645.

Desak Made Widi Antari. Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora. 2024;1(4).

Artikel Terkait

Eksistensi Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah dalam Penyidikan terhadap Perlindungan Hak Tersangka pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana

Rifdatul Riskiyanti; Syarifuddin Syarifuddin; Moh. Ali Hofi

Optimization of the Role of Lawyers in Debt Restructuring and PKPU in Indonesia: A Juridical Study on the Protection of Debtors and Creditors

Vidya Ayuningtyas; Clarisa Clarisa; Novita Rahmawati; Albertus Satrio; Kristanta Kristanta; Luthfian Hananta; Anggo Doyoharjo

Strengthening the Enforcement of the Advocate's Code of Ethics as an Effort to Enhance Professionalism in the Profession

Ilham Khafid Alfarozi; Anand Pamuji Gusti; Afrizal Anindya Helvin; Wahyu Saputro; Agus Joko Purnomo; Agatha Jumiati

Restorative Justice in the Perspective of Modern Criminal Law: Challenges and Regulatory Reforms in Indonesia

Bambang Ali Kusumo; Supriyanta Supriyanta; Kartika Asmanda Putri

Unfair Contract Terms in the Perspective of Civil Law and Consumer Protection in Indonesia

Josef Purwadi Setiodjati; Anggo Doyoharjo; Dora Kusumastuti

Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Lahirnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 69/PUU-XII/2015

Putri Ruqiatul Hilal
Tren Sitasi Jurnal