Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia)

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto ; Khalimi Khalimi
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Human... 📅 2026 Vol 5, No 2 🔗 DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8514
Abstract
This study examines the distortion between civil and criminal perspectives in the legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of Judex Juris in Supreme Court Decision Number 121K/Pid.Sus/2020. The decision lacks substantial criminal law considerations regarding the alleged corruption offense. Instead, the legal reasoning focuses on the fault or negligence of company directors, particularly the exception under Article 97 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, which embodies the Business Judgment Rule doctrine. Furthermore, these considerations are distorted by tort (onrechtmatige daad) as regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code juncto Article 138 paragraph (1) letter b of the Company Law. This research employs a legislative approach by analyzing various legal instruments, including the 1945 Constitution, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Limited Liability Company Law, State-Owned Enterprises Law, Judicial Power Law, Supreme Court Law, and the Corruption Eradication Laws. A conceptual approach is also utilized to examine theoretical concepts concerning corporate crime, directors' liabilities, state losses, tort, negligence from criminal and civil perspectives, business judgment rules, collective collegiality principles, and formal-material classification of legislation. The data comprises primary legal materials (legislation and court decisions) and secondary legal materials (legal literature and scientific journals). Analysis is conducted qualitatively by interpreting legal principles and their relevance to the court's considerations in the decision.
Keywords
Business Judgment Rule; Corporate Crimes; Corruption; Director's Liability; Distortion of Law
How to Cite

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto & Khalimi Khalimi (2026). Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia). Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8514

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto; Khalimi Khalimi, "Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia)," Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, vol. 5, no. 2, 2026.

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto; Khalimi Khalimi. "Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia)." Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, vol. 5, no. 2, 2026.

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto; Khalimi Khalimi. "Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia)." Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora 5, no. 2 (2026).

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto & Khalimi Khalimi (2026) 'Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia)', Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(2). doi: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8514.

Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto; Khalimi Khalimi. Distorsi Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgment Rules dalam Putusan Nomor 121k/Pid.Sus/2020: (Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait PT Pertamina Hulu Energi dalam Kegiatan Investasi Blok BMG Australia). Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora. 2026;5(2).

Artikel Terkait

Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan terhadap Hak Pekerja dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja akibat Kepailitan

I Nengah Sucipta Angga Putra; I Gusti Ayu Eviani Yuliantari; Putu Eva Ditayani Antari; Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma

Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Affiliator E-Commerce atas Pelanggaran Hak Ekonomi Pencipta Video TikTok

Made Daksa Pradipa Arsa; Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Bagus Gede Ari Rama

Analisis Yuridis Penggunaan Cryptocurrency sebagai Sarana Pendanaan Aksi Terorisme di Indonesia Beserta Tantangan dalam Penegakan Hukum

Rizky Dwi Utami; Ahmad Nafhani; Agung Pratama

Tradisi Perkawinan Ana Ale di Desa Tiwu Tewa Kecamatan Ende Timur Kabupaten Ende di Tinjau dari Hukum Adat

Emiliana Sari Padi; Darius Mauritsius; Petornius Damat

Perlindungan Hukum Preventif dalam Menjamin Hak-Hak Tenaga Kerja Menurut Perjanjian Kerja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Maria Reinha Rosari Luntar; Umbu Lily Pekuwali; Hermawati A. Y. Dai

Pelaksanaan Fungsi Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa dalam Mewujudkan Pembangunan Desa di Desa Oematamboli Kecamatan Lobalain Kabupaten Rote Ndao

Julfrista Sinlae; Rafael Rape Tupen; Marlyani Anita Seran
Tren Sitasi Jurnal