Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi ; Intan Sukmawati ; Euis Maesaroh ; Aji Nugraha ; Taufiq Alamsyah
Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora 📅 2026 Vol 3, No 3 🔗 DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1678
Abstract
This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the legal reasoning used by judges in the Administrative Court (PTUN) in annulling State Administrative Decisions (KTUN), as well as to examine the legal implications for the parties involved and the overall system of government administration. This research employs a normative juridical method with three approaches: statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by studying reference books and reviewing court decisions. The study shows that the annulment of KTUN by PTUN judges is based on three important factors, namely lack of authority (ultra vires), procedural defects, and substantive defects in the decision. In addition, violations of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), such as the principles of legal certainty, prudence, and proportionality, also constitute important considerations for judges. In the judicial process, judges not only consider the formal aspects of the law, but also take into account substantive justice in order to protect citizens’ rights from improper governmental actions. The implications of the annulment of KTUN include the restoration of the plaintiff’s rights through the process of restitutio in integrum, the obligation of administrative officials to revoke or correct the issued decision, as well as the potential impact on third parties involved in the decision. In general, the annulment of KTUN serves as a legal control mechanism over government administration while also encouraging the realization of good and transparent governance within a state governed by the rule of law.
Keywords
Abuse of Authority; Annulment of State Administrative Decisions (KTUN); Administrative Court (PTUN); Procedural Defects; Substantive Defects
How to Cite

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi, et al. (2026). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN. Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1678

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi; Intan Sukmawati; Euis Maesaroh; Aji Nugraha; Taufiq Alamsyah, "Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN," Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, vol. 3, no. 3, 2026.

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi; Intan Sukmawati; Euis Maesaroh; Aji Nugraha; Taufiq Alamsyah. "Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN." Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, vol. 3, no. 3, 2026.

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi; Intan Sukmawati; Euis Maesaroh; Aji Nugraha; Taufiq Alamsyah. "Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN." Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora 3, no. 3 (2026).

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi, et al. (2026) 'Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN', Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(3). doi: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1678.

Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi; Intan Sukmawati; Euis Maesaroh; Aji Nugraha; Taufiq Alamsyah. Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN. Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora. 2026;3(3).

Artikel Terkait

Pancasila as Grundnorm and Islamic Religious Education as Moral Foundation: Strengthening Constitutional Order through Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory

Nazila Riskiya Putri; Nayla Damayanti; Meifta Dian Safitri; Ahmad Muhamad Mustin Nasoha

Pancasila and Islamic Religious Education as Ethical Foundations: Developing Digital Law in the Era of Technological Transformation through Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory

Ahmad Muhammad Musain Nasoha; Afifah Nur Khusna; Erma Nur Fitriyani; Yesha Renata Andyne Ramadhani

Paradoks Sentralisasi dalam Desentralisasi: Analisis Konflik Norma Vertikal-Horizontal pada Evolusi UU Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia

Desi Ayuherma Anugrah; I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan

Perbandingan Kebijakan Formulasi Ganja di Kanada dan Uruguay Dikaitkan dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Shinta Chintya Fella; Syaifulah Yophi Ardiyanto; Tengku Arif Hidayat

Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Fungsi DPRD Kota Sukabumi berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2018

Ita Mulyawati Dewi; Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya

Kekosongan Norma Digital Forensik dalam Penanganan Kejahatan Sumber Daya Alam (SDA): Analisis Tanggung Jawab Konstitusional Negara Pasca UU 1/2024

Putu Khanha Khilana Putra Bukian; Ni Luh Wayan Yasmiati; Seni Kamalia Rizki Fathullah
Tren Sitasi Jurnal